|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Farcility sightlines
A couple of weeks ago I mentioned in another thread the latest attempt
by Suffolk CC to kill cyclists, approved by Sustrans. Yesterday I did a quick survey of the site and got some figures. The problem is that cyclists heading west on NCN-51 are on a scared use path on the Exning Road out of Newmarket, and are directed to get off the path and cross the road to join a 1m wide advisory cycle lane when they get into Exning. The crossing point is close to the apex of a corner (TL 622654 [1]). Visibility in one direction is about 250m, but in the other direction it's 40m. So I took a stopwatch and timed how long it took between a driver being able to see a cyclist standing at the crossing point and actually reaching the crossing point. Or a cyclist being able to see a vehicle coming and being hit by it.... 20 timings: min 2.3 seconds, max 3.7 seconds, average 3.0 These cars, vans and trucks were all either on their own or the leaders of a queue: followers in a queue were ignored. Of those 20 drivers 2 were on a hand-held mobile phone (and faster than average) and 1 was eating... So, how do you fancy your chances crossing at that point? [1] http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=tl622654&ll=52.263088,0.375697&sp n=0.001845,0.00456&t=k Mike |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Farcility sightlines
Mike Causer wrote:
in the other direction it's 40m. So I took a stopwatch and timed how long it took between a driver being able to see a cyclist standing at the crossing point and actually reaching the crossing point. Or a cyclist being able to see a vehicle coming and being hit by it.... 20 timings: min 2.3 seconds, max 3.7 seconds, average 3.0 Sounds an absolute bloody nightmare. Have you bought this to Sustrans', council's, etc, attention? And if so, what is their response? R. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Farcility sightlines
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:14:42 +0000, Richard wrote:
Sounds an absolute bloody nightmare. Have you bought this to Sustrans', council's, etc, attention? Not yet, but I will. I think taking a 400mm lens down there for some photos will do a good job of illustrating the problem. In practice that crossing is quite unlikely to be used. All the local traffic, kids & adults, who were already on the path /before/ it was scared use will simply continue on the pavement. Any experienced cyclist would be on the perfectly reasonable road anyway. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Farcility of the Month | Peter Owens | UK | 58 | January 5th 06 07:52 PM |
Today's Farcility | Tony Raven | UK | 13 | July 25th 05 01:55 PM |
Not really a farcility, but... | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 232 | July 12th 05 12:42 AM |
Another Farcility | Tony Raven | UK | 54 | July 3rd 05 09:45 PM |
Another cycle farcility | Tim Hall | UK | 6 | August 26th 03 10:14 PM |