|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Courier Mail: Drunk cyclist gets car licence back
Good to see someone understands the law. Although I don't see why the
judge in this case had to undertake "a very detailed examination" of the TORUM Act. It's pretty obvious that the Blood Alcohol Content requirements only apply to motor vehicle users. The law dates back to the 1970s from my memory but there have been numerous cyclists charged (and convicted) of riding with more than the prescribed BAC since then, especially in Mackay. I know which vehicle I'll be taking to the staff Xmas drinks this year. The guy's main problem was pleading guilty. He should have made the police prove he was under the influence. In the TORUM Act, a driver of a motor vehicle is considered to be "under the influence" of alcohol if they have a BAC of more than 0.15% (ie three times the lower limit). A cyclist does not have to submit to a breath test so it is up to police to find some other means of determining whether the rider is under the influence. I'm pretty sure the law applies to cyclists Australia wide. Would be worth checking. P COURIER MAIL Drunk cyclist gets car licence back A CYCLIST who lost his driver's licence after refusing an alcohol breath test has had it returned after a judge found a magistrate had no power to disqualify him from driving a car. Last August in the Mackay Magistrate's Court, Paul Francis Eveston pleaded guilty riding a bicycle while under the influence of alcohol and refusing to provide a breath specimen. The court heard that, on July 13 last year, Eveston was riding his bicycle along Landsdowne Rd in Mackay when he was pulled over by police who suspected he had been drinking. Police took Eveston to the Mackay police station where he refused to provide a breath sample. Eveston was put on two years' probation and disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver's licence for nine months. He appealed on the grounds the court did not have the power to disqualify his driver's licence. In a written judgment, which became available in Brisbane today, Judge Kerry O'Brien agreed and set aside the disqualification. After a very detailed examination of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act, Judge O'Brien noted there were two distinct sections - one covering motor vehicles and the other bicycles and horses, etc. Judge O'Brien found the section used to disqualify a car driver could not be applied to a bicycle. "In the circumstances of this case the (Magistrate's) Court had no power to order the appellant (Eveston) should be disqualified from holding or obtaining a drivers licence," he said. Judge O'Brien allowed the appeal and set aside the disqualification. Mark Oberhardt June 06, 2008 09:53am Article from: (http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/) |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Courier Mail March 5 | osc[_2_] | Australia | 22 | March 13th 07 11:02 PM |
What is it with The Courier Mail?? | Donga | Australia | 51 | June 4th 06 11:05 AM |
Bne: Courier Mail: Walking, riding our way to health | Donga | Australia | 8 | April 11th 06 11:19 PM |
Courier Mail: Drunk cyclist is banned from driving | Donga | Australia | 17 | March 7th 06 03:41 AM |