#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:40:44 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 25, 10:08 am, Andre Jute wrote: I deliberately delayed giving a full explanation, and several times gave Fogel the tip that he made wrong assumptions, to give him time to apologize. He didn't. And he shouldn't. - Frank Krygowski Dear Frank, I won't. First Andre started off with the casual comment that he did well over 100 kmh "downhill, of course." Of course one adds "downhill, of course". One doesn't want to claim to be as athletic as much more dedicated cyclists. When several people pointed out the unlikelihood of that, This is a lie by Fogel, attempting to confuse the timeline. Only one person, Clive George, posted about it, and he merely asked for the place. Nobody mentioned unlikelihood to me. Before I could reply, Carl Fogel several times called me a liar. he whined This is a lie by Fogel whose object is to confuse the timeline by a whole day. Only *after* Fogel called me a liar several times did I object. that we might as well ask for proof that the sun came up. This is a lie by Fogel. He tries to put words in my mouth that I never spoke and that are contrary to the ones I did speak: "Yes, I was amazed that Fogel should start calling me a liar before I could even answer. I hadn't realized that, in Fogel's McCathyite worldview, rec.bicycles.tech is so largely populated by liars that anyone saying the sun shines outside should first present a notarized report from the weather bureau." Pressed for the place, he came up with an obscure road. Why, are only famous roads in America, personally approved by Carl Fogel, good enough to be towed a miserable 100kph on? Of course a road I can block off temporarily without attracting official attention is obscure, you moron. Irish farm lanes aren't labelled with names or numbers either. I had to identify this one by names of fields on the Ordnance Survey map. Gradually he developed a whole new story This lie by Fogel is given the lie by the contrary claim that I trolled Fogel by withholding the facts. If I selectively withheld the facts, I wasn't "developing" a whole new story, I was just not telling all of it. involving a truck and recording his speed "on a certified calibrated government approved speedometer." This is Fogel's provincial American ignorance dressed up as an accusation of lying. Such speedometers are fitted to all longrange trucks in Europe to ensure the drivers don't work more hours than legally permitted, don't speed, and so on. It's just as plausible as Unlikehood is neither impossibility nor untruth. his original story. Another lie by Fogel. There is only one story. But Fogel accused me of being a liar before I could tell it, so I withheld the crucial fact while he made a fool of himself. Fogel has only his weak and vicious character to blame for his embarrassment. If encouraged, he'd probably develop a long story about that amazing speedometer and why he didn't mention the speed that it supposedly recorded. Here Fogel looks into the future and tells you he knows what I will say and in advance declares it a lie. No better example of Carl Fogel's malice and dishonesty is likely to be found. Oh, and this, he didn't mention the speed that it supposedly recorded. is another lie by Fogel. I did mention the speed the truck speedometer recorded, the release speed of 105kph. His story wouldn't show any awareness that his "downhill, of course" was nonsense--riders have been beating 60 mph while drafting on the flats for over a century. Once more Fogel looks into the future and claims to know what is in my mind. This time he finds ignorance. No comment because none is necessary. It doesn't really matter whether Andre actually thinks that it's necessary to add "downhill, of course" while not mentioning "behind a truck," whether he really knows of a "certified calibrated government approved speedometer," or whether he's just a compulsive Munchausen who plans to keep changing his stories until they're believed--who's going to believe his next implausible story? In plain English: "I, Carl Fogel, will call Andre Jute a liar regardless of what he says." I might point out that what is plausible on Fogel's little street corner is hardly a universal standard, nor cause for this scumbag Fogel to call anyone a liar. But why bother? Fogel has already told us that if I say, "The sun is shining," he will call me a liar. He'll just claim that everyone who doubted him was making foolish assumptions and should have realized that he was drafting a truck downhill. Again, Fogel claims to see into my mind and to know what I will say. And again he declares in advance that whatever I say is a lie. Or that the sun was up, just in Thailand, not Ireland. Or whatever dodge he thinks will keep people talking to him. What did I just tell you! If you met a fellow who told stories that way outside the internet, you'd simply walk away from him If I met a fellow who called me a liar before I even told the story, which is what Fogel has done, I'd kick his butt over the houses to teach him some manners. and his explanations about how honest he is. This is a lie by Fogel. I don't need to explain how honest I am, nor have I done so. Straightforward rationality will explain to all men of goodwill how honest -- or otherwise -- I am. I don't plan to feed the troll. Run, rabbit, run. Cheers, Carl Fogel You a simpering backstabber, Carl Fogel, and a liar, and a false accuser. In short, you're scum. Andre Jute Zero tolerance for pompous little netfuhrers |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
Andre Jute wrote:
snip crap are you related to this guy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI-5_Persecution |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
On Jan 27, 3:53*pm, jim beam wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: snip crap are you related to this guy?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI-5_Persecution It's all true! MI-5 is in my head! I can hear them! Fogel is behind it -- him and his endless patents and old bicycles. Does he have a subscription to the patent channel or what? I'm sitting here recovering from my leg surgery ala Rear Window (regrettably minus Grace Kelly -- no offense to my wife, but I would break both legs for '50s Grace Kelly), and I still do not have the spare time for these epic rants. However, I must give Mr. Jute credit for his energy, some clever retorts and the fact that he has not yet used the term "****tard" -- which is a term so stupid that just typing it reduces ones IQ by eight points. I am reducing my intake of opioids just so I can follow Carl's response. I suggest that he and Mr. Jute agree on a single thread and not persue several threads. The bouncing back and forth makes my head hurt. -- Jay Beattie. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
Jay Beattie wrote:
...However, I must give Mr. Jute credit for his energy, some clever retorts and the fact that he has not yet used the term "****tard" -- which is a term so stupid that just typing it reduces ones IQ by eight points.... It [1] does seem the type of term that junior high schoolers would use. [1] Indefinite pronoun used to avoid the loss of eight (8) IQ points. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." - A. Derleth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
On Jan 27, 5:44*pm, Andre Jute wrote:
wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:40:44 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 25, 10:08 am, Andre Jute wrote: I deliberately delayed giving a full explanation, and several times gave Fogel the tip that he made wrong assumptions, to give him time to apologize. He didn't. And he shouldn't. - Frank Krygowski Dear Frank, I won't. First Andre started off with the casual comment that he did well over 100 kmh "downhill, of course." Of course one adds "downhill, of course". One doesn't want to claim to be as athletic as much more dedicated cyclists. When several people pointed out the unlikelihood of that, This is a lie by Fogel, attempting to confuse the timeline. Only one person, Clive George, posted about it, and he merely asked for the place. Nobody mentioned unlikelihood to me. Before I could reply, Carl Fogel several times called me a liar. he whined This is a lie by Fogel whose object is to confuse the timeline by a whole day. Only *after* Fogel called me a liar several times did I object. that we might as well ask for proof that the sun came up. This is a lie by Fogel. He tries to put words in my mouth that I never spoke and that are contrary to the ones I did speak: "Yes, I was amazed that Fogel should start calling me a liar before I could even answer. I hadn't realized that, in Fogel's McCathyite worldview, rec.bicycles.tech is so largely populated by liars that anyone saying the sun shines outside should first present a notarized report from the weather bureau." Pressed for the place, he came up with an obscure road. Why, are only famous roads in America, personally approved by Carl Fogel, good enough to be towed a miserable 100kph on? Of course a road I can block off temporarily without attracting official attention is obscure, you moron. Irish farm lanes aren't labelled with names or numbers either. I had to identify this one by names of fields on the Ordnance Survey map. Gradually he developed a whole new story This lie by Fogel is given the lie by the contrary claim that I trolled Fogel by withholding the facts. If I selectively withheld the facts, I wasn't "developing" a whole new story, I was just not telling all of it. involving a truck and recording his speed "on a certified calibrated government approved speedometer." This is Fogel's provincial American ignorance dressed up as an accusation of lying. Such speedometers are fitted to all longrange trucks in Europe to ensure the drivers don't work more hours than legally permitted, don't speed, and so on. It's just as plausible as Unlikehood is neither impossibility nor untruth. his original story. Another lie by Fogel. There is only one story. But Fogel accused me of being a liar before I could tell it, so I withheld the crucial fact while he made a fool of himself. Fogel has only his weak and vicious character to blame for his embarrassment. If encouraged, he'd probably develop a long story about that amazing speedometer and why he didn't mention the speed that it supposedly recorded. Here Fogel looks into the future and tells you he knows what I will say and in advance declares it a lie. No better example of Carl Fogel's malice and dishonesty is likely to be found. Oh, and this, he didn't mention the speed that it supposedly recorded. is another lie by Fogel. I did mention the speed the truck speedometer recorded, the release speed of 105kph. His story wouldn't show any awareness that his "downhill, of course" was nonsense--riders have been beating 60 mph while drafting on the flats for over a century. Once more Fogel looks into the future and claims to know what is in my mind. This time he finds ignorance. No comment because none is necessary. It doesn't really matter whether Andre actually thinks that it's necessary to add "downhill, of course" while not mentioning "behind a truck," whether he really knows of a "certified calibrated government approved speedometer," or whether he's just a compulsive Munchausen who plans to keep changing his stories until they're believed--who's going to believe his next implausible story? In plain English: "I, Carl Fogel, will call Andre Jute a liar regardless of what he says." I might point out that what is plausible on Fogel's little street corner is hardly a universal standard, nor cause for this scumbag Fogel to call anyone a liar. But why bother? Fogel has already told us that if I say, "The sun is shining," he will call me a liar. He'll just claim that everyone who doubted him was making foolish assumptions and should have realized that he was drafting a truck downhill. Again, Fogel claims to see into my mind and to know what I will say. And again he declares in advance that whatever I say is a lie. Or that the sun was up, just in Thailand, not Ireland. Or whatever dodge he thinks will keep people talking to him. What did I just tell you! If you met a fellow who told stories that way outside the internet, you'd simply walk away from him If I met a fellow who called me a liar before I even told the story, which is what Fogel has done, I'd kick his butt over the houses to teach him some manners. and his explanations about how honest he is. This is a lie by Fogel. I don't need to explain how honest I am, nor have I done so. Straightforward rationality will explain to all men of goodwill how honest -- or otherwise -- I am. I don't plan to feed the troll. Run, rabbit, run. Cheers, Carl Fogel You a simpering backstabber, Carl Fogel, and a liar, and a false accuser. In short, you're scum. Andre Jute Zero tolerance for pompous little netfuhrers Now in a Usenet Theatre near you: "The Talltale Teller vs. The Smarmy Asshole!" Pass the popcorn. :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
Dans le message de ,
Bill Sornson a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré : Andre Jute wrote: {Hugh Jass Memorial Snip} You a simpering backstabber, Carl Fogel, and a liar, and a false accuser. In short, you're scum. Careful, that's definition of character. (Or the lack thereof.) Andre Jute Zero tolerance for pompous little netfuhrers Get in line. Bill "just plonk him and move on" S. Didn't he take a long leave of absence at one point? Not that I recommend very strongly that he do so, but .... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
In article
, Andre Jute wrote: I address myself to everyone. As a matter of fact Carl Fogel never once said that Andre Jute lied or is a liar. It is rather surprising how quickly that the counter-claim has been taken to be fact. I am as quick as anyone to understand the direction of Carl Fogel's writing. He implies that he does not believe Andre Jute and presents evidence that everyone should accept as being compelling _for_Carl_. Please, everyone, keep your facts straight. -- Michael Press |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
In article
, Andre Jute wrote: If I met a fellow who called me a liar before I even told the story, which is what Fogel has done, I'd kick his butt over the houses to teach him some manners. What kind of person immediately turns to violence when his word is called into question. "Do not question what I say, else I will beat you into submission." -- Michael Press |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
In article
, Jay Beattie wrote: On Jan 27, 3:53*pm, jim beam wrote: Andre Jute wrote: snip crap are you related to this guy?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI-5_Persecution It's all true! MI-5 is in my head! I can hear them! Fogel is behind it -- him and his endless patents and old bicycles. Does he have a subscription to the patent channel or what? I'm sitting here recovering from my leg surgery ala Rear Window (regrettably minus Grace Kelly -- no offense to my wife, but I would break both legs for '50s Grace Kelly), and I still do not have the spare time for these epic rants. However, I must give Mr. Jute credit for his energy, some clever retorts and the fact that he has not yet used the term "****tard" -- which is a term so stupid that just typing it reduces ones IQ by eight points. I am reducing my intake of opioids just so I can follow Carl's response. I suggest that he and Mr. Jute agree on a single thread and not persue several threads. The bouncing back and forth makes my head hurt. -- Jay Beattie. He has resorted to threats of violence. -- Michael Press |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lie by Fogel tm
Michael Press wrote:
In article , Jay Beattie wrote: On Jan 27, 3:53 pm, jim beam wrote: Andre Jute wrote: snip crap are you related to this guy?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI-5_Persecution It's all true! MI-5 is in my head! I can hear them! Fogel is behind it -- him and his endless patents and old bicycles. Does he have a subscription to the patent channel or what? I'm sitting here recovering from my leg surgery ala Rear Window (regrettably minus Grace Kelly -- no offense to my wife, but I would break both legs for '50s Grace Kelly), and I still do not have the spare time for these epic rants. However, I must give Mr. Jute credit for his energy, some clever retorts and the fact that he has not yet used the term "****tard" -- which is a term so stupid that just typing it reduces ones IQ by eight points. I am reducing my intake of opioids just so I can follow Carl's response. I suggest that he and Mr. Jute agree on a single thread and not persue several threads. The bouncing back and forth makes my head hurt. -- Jay Beattie. He has resorted to threats of violence. Indefinite pronoun alert! Who is "he" - Mike Corley, Jay Beattie, Andre Jute, Carl Fogel, "jim beam" or someone not named in the above post? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." - A. Derleth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A message for Carl Fogel | [email protected] | Techniques | 70 | June 26th 06 11:37 AM |
Q for Carl Fogel: Are you for or against lynching? | App | Techniques | 11 | June 17th 05 07:59 AM |
One for Carl Fogel (at Comcast Dot Net :) | S o r n i | General | 14 | April 9th 05 08:46 PM |
One for Carl Fogel (at Comcast Dot Net :) | S o r n i | Techniques | 36 | April 9th 05 08:46 PM |
Carl Fogel, who are you? | Appkiller | Techniques | 28 | January 25th 05 08:38 PM |