|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
More on mobile phones & other wireless devices
On 27 Apr 2007 13:06:50 GMT, Chris wrote:
Mike Vandeman wrote in : On 26 Apr 2007 15:30:05 GMT, Chris wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote in : On 26 Apr 2007 11:58:18 GMT, Chris wrote: (Bill Z.) wrote in : Mike Vandeman writes: On 24 Apr 2007 16:24:08 -0700, (Bill Z.) wrote: Mike Vandeman writes: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:27 GMT, (Bill Z.) wrote: Mike Vandeman writes: Right. And when you're done, please completely explain Schrödinger's Equation -- every part of it. LOL. It's well covered in any number of undergraduate text books, so I'll simply refer you to those - if you want me to teach you physics, you can pay me to do it. I knew you couldn't explain it. You only throw around physics jargon for effect. Of course, it doesn't work. It's obvious that you can't explain why cell phones cause tumors. Vandeman, you are an idiot. Killing vectors are used in Riemanian geometries (curved spaced time, i.e., in physics applications, general relativity). We aren't trying to formulate a quantum field theory for gravity or anything like that. We were, rather, discussing the interaction of matter with low levels of electromagnetic radiation at a frequency of 1 or 2 gigahertz, something we understood very well during the first half of the 20th century. As to the Shroedinger equation, I'm not going to play games with you where you try to waste my time by trying to get me to write a text book and publish it on usenet (where I'd also have to deal with the difficulty of rendering mathematical notation in ASCII text), only to have you ignore it anyway. As I suspected, you can't do it. You are a fake, which we knew all along. LOL! Do you have any idea what I studied in graduate school? :-) If you want me to provide you with some tutoring, you can damn well pay for the privledge. Why don't you first tell me what you know about Hilbert spaces? You'll have to learn about that as background material. Read up on Hermitian operators too. Bill, You are arguing with an idiot. He knows everything, just as him. I do find his answers amusing. Ever wonder what his true goal is? If it were to 'educate' the mountain biker to their evil ways and possibly convince them to stop riding off road, he has FAILED miserably. You mean that the mountain bikers have failed to learn anything, as usual. If on the other hand, his goal is to have you 'wrapped around the axel' here, and not out riding, then he has succeeded to some degree. Best thing you can do is ignore him. Just like you would any 4 year- old throwing a temper tantrum. Go out and ride, that will get his goat. Chris Foster PS Mike: You note that I signed my 'real' name and will be in San Jose in May. Would you like to get together and have a nice polite discussion?? Whatever for? You have nothing to teach me. As I said, you feel that you know everything. In reality, you have quite a bit to learn. For example, how to along with other people, Go ahead. Teach! Show us what you know! Once again, you vainly attempt to distort the subject. The subject is not what I can teach you. The subject was what you can learn. Bill, for example, appears to understand quite a bit more about physics than you do. Yet you argue with him, why? Did it advance your cause? No, it just made you look more foolish (if that was truly possible) and alienated another person. Bill would make a very strong supporter with his knowledge, but I feel that he will now avoid you or go out of his way to discredit you. You missed the point (intentionally). You just said "you have quite a bit to learn. For example, how to along with other people". So teach us! -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
More on mobile phones & other wireless devices
Mike Vandeman writes:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:28:59 GMT, (Bill Z.) wrote: Mike Vandeman writes: On 26 Apr 2007 19:09:02 -0700, (Bill Z.) wrote: Now, how about explaining where your cell phone towers come in. :-) That's your area, so you claim. Huh? I never claimed to be a biologist, You said it's just a matter of physics. Dishonest reply due to being out of context (I never claimed that the particular pathogens that might be responsible for the bee problem was specifically a physics question). but you posted articles touting this "cell phone towers bad for bees" thing. Now, care to explain why your sources didn't mention all the other more plausible explanations? (Note the lack of a response.) -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
More on mobile phones & other wireless devices
Corvus Corvax wrote in
oups.com: On Apr 23, 7:13 pm, (Bill Z.) wrote: You might start with the difference [... yadda yadda yadda ...] Wow. Clueless, humorless, AND pedantic. Extra point for trying to name- drop Richard Feynman. Have at 'im Mikey. He deserves you. And BZ, feel free to have the last word. I know you can't resist. Over and out. CC Actually, if you look look at the the thread, it was Vandeman who did the name dropping -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
More on mobile phones & other wireless devices
(Bill Z.) wrote in
: Mike Vandeman writes: On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:28:59 GMT, (Bill Z.) wrote: Mike Vandeman writes: On 26 Apr 2007 19:09:02 -0700, (Bill Z.) wrote: Now, how about explaining where your cell phone towers come in. :-) That's your area, so you claim. Huh? I never claimed to be a biologist, You said it's just a matter of physics. Dishonest reply due to being out of context (I never claimed that the particular pathogens that might be responsible for the bee problem was specifically a physics question). but you posted articles touting this "cell phone towers bad for bees" thing. Now, care to explain why your sources didn't mention all the other more plausible explanations? (Note the lack of a response.) OK everybody, back away from the idiot, I think Mikey head is going to explode -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are mobile phones wiping out our bees? | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 24 | April 24th 07 07:05 PM |
Hub Dynamo for charging mobile phones | biking-geordie | UK | 9 | October 30th 06 11:49 AM |
So many people driving with mobile phones | dannyfrankszzz | UK | 22 | September 7th 06 12:06 PM |
Mobile 'phones crackdown | MartinM | UK | 79 | November 23rd 04 02:32 PM |
Mobile Phones | Vincent Wilcox | UK | 38 | December 5th 03 10:02 AM |