Ride an SUB not an SUV

"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..

I get really tired of people talking about New Orleans like it's some sort
of failure of national policy. The problem in NO is local leadership and
the helpless mentality of the New Orleans residents who get media
attention. Mississippi had it worse if anything (whole towns here were
completely wiped off the map), but you don't hear people referring to us
as a symptom of some sort of national malaise. And the reason why is that
our leadership made the decision that we would pick ourselves up by our
bootstraps and get back to work, whether or not there was any aid at the
federal level. New Orleans chose a different path--even worse, they chose
to keep the mayor who'd failed them so badly in power.

Damned freaking straight, sister. Well put.

Bill S.

"John Kane" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 6, 6:28 pm, "George Conklin"
wrote:
"donquijote1954" wrote in message

ups.com...



On Apr 5, 5:10 pm, "George Conklin"
wrote:
"Chris" wrote in message

. ..

"George Conklin" wrote in
link.net:

"Dave Head" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:39:54 GMT, "George Conklin"
wrote:

"Dave Head" wrote in message
.. .
My home town, Fostoria, Ohio, is dotted with factories in
all
corners
except
the extreme Northwest. People live across the street from
factories
all
over
that town. Life is great - there's lotsa people that can
walk
to
work.
There's
very little downside to it - some people get bothered by
truck
traffic
a
bit,
but otherwise its great. You even get used to the factory
whistles,
and
use
them to tell time without your watch.

Dave Head

The rust belt is not the future. Small factories are going
out of
business
all over the place due to their inefficiency and global
competition.

And this statement invalidates the concept of living close to
work
exactly
how?

DPH

We already live close to work: 20 minutes on the average. That
is
close enough.

20 minutes by foot?? No, by automobile. We in the west are so
dependent upon our cars. 10 minuts by foot is about a mile away.

The walkable city disappeared before industrialization. You
cannot
have
a modern city with walking the main way to get around. It was
impossible in
1890 too.-

It didn't disappear, it was killed, just like the trolley.

By the way, in 1890 it was BICYCLES that ruled the roads...

It was the trolley which spread cities by a factor of 100 AND ended
the
walkable city. Bicycles? They changed nothing.

I take it that you have never read "The Revenge of the Methodist
Biycle Company"? John Kane, Kingston ON Canada


I read honest demography, not propaganda.

"Tim McNamara" wrote in message
...
In article t,
"George Conklin" wrote:

"Tim McNamara" wrote in message news:timmcn-

Seems to me that there are just too many people, who all have to
live somewhere and have as much right to good housing as I have.
There's no perfect solution- allow sprawl and spend trillions of
dollars subsidizing cars. Increase density and get the problems of
crowding- increased crime, pummeled infrastructure, and a tendency
towards a bleaker and more aggressive life.

All the gloom and doom posted here does NOT reflect reality. Give it
up boys...half the counties in the USA are losing population and the
people will move to the few areas where growth is happening.

That's one of those statistics that follows lies and damned lies.


You mean Atlanda is also not growing while Buffalo is shrinking? Can't
deal with reality can you?

"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..

"George Conklin" wrote in message
k.net...

"donquijote1954" wrote in message
oups.com...

please learn to snip

Sprawl Costs Us All

Many people think that sprawl (or scattered growth) is an inevitable
result of an economic system that demands lower costs and efficiency.
But this is a myth: sprawl development costs more than careful
planning and development.

"Sprawl is cheaper for developers than careful planning because they
can pass much of the cost on to taxpayers. The real cost of sprawl is
dispersed through a range of other costs that we, as citizens and
consumers, have to pay."

http://www.smartergrowth.net/issues/...stofsprawl.htm


Smart Growth is based on a lie, but a useful one to get the taxpayer to
pay
for a developer's schemes.

All developers try to get other people (especially taxpayers) to pay for
as
much of what they are building as they can. This is not unique to any one
school of thought. Smart Growth is just a convenient label, both for
developers and critics, because it is the only school of thought that has
a
name.

Label pasting is not progress.

"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..

"Bill" wrote in message
...
donquijote1954 wrote:

You even find them in the environmental movement, feeding the hungry
children in Timbuktu and in the promotion of democracy for Iraq...

For example:

(this is serious)

'For the Bush administration, democracy promotion is not just a "made
in the U.S." venture, but a goal shared with many other countries. We
also seek to broaden our partnerships with local and global
nongovernmental organizations and international organizations, so that
we can work together on democracy promotion, advancement of human
rights, and humanitarian relief.'

No ****. Bush seems to think he can blow smoke up everybodies ass.
Other countries share the goal of not having to listen to American B.S.
We have no REAL partnerships because they will **** on us and change
sides
as soon as it is to their advantage. 'Partner' is a word that is way
overused in business. Your 'partner' can switch overnight and put you
out
of business. China is not a partner or friend but they love our money.
Democracy promotion is reserved for those with oil for us.
Advancement of human rights is just politician rhetoric.
Humanitarian relief means sending our money to a country that does not
appreciate it, all for a news byte, and while ignoring the problems at
home, like New Orleans, the homeless in OUR country, etc.

I get really tired of people talking about New Orleans like it's some sort
of failure of national policy. The problem in NO is local leadership and
the helpless mentality of the New Orleans residents who get media
attention.
Mississippi had it worse if anything (whole towns here were completely
wiped
off the map), but you don't hear people referring to us as a symptom of
some
sort of national malaise. And the reason why is that our leadership made
the decision that we would pick ourselves up by our bootstraps and get
back
to work, whether or not there was any aid at the federal level. New
Orleans
chose a different path--even worse, they chose to keep the mayor who'd
failed them so badly in power.


You mean living below sea level has nothing to do with floods? ha Ha HA.

On Apr 6, 10:08 pm, "George Conklin"
wrote:
"Tim McNamara" wrote in message

...

In article t,
"George Conklin" wrote:

Smart Growth is based on a lie, but a useful one to get the taxpayer
to pay for a developer's schemes.

Not like that's new. That sort of scheming was around long before
"smart growth."

True, but smart growth is just the latest scam.

EVERYTHING is a scam nowadays, down to the presidential elections and
the most expensive war this side of WWII...

But what you propose to stop the scam at hand, namely Smart Growth?
How do you make a smart policy, even you drop the word "smart" from it?

-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..


I get really tired of people talking about New Orleans like it's some sort
of failure of national policy. The problem in NO is local leadership and
the helpless mentality of the New Orleans residents who get media
attention.
Mississippi had it worse if anything (whole towns here were completely
wiped
off the map), but you don't hear people referring to us as a symptom of
some
sort of national malaise. And the reason why is that our leadership made
the decision that we would pick ourselves up by our bootstraps and get
back
to work, whether or not there was any aid at the federal level. New
Orleans
chose a different path--even worse, they chose to keep the mayor who'd
failed them so badly in power.

Why is it we can spend $100 Billion on building Iraq, but not $2 billion on
our own nation?

"Baxter" wrote in message
...
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..


I get really tired of people talking about New Orleans like it's some
sort
of failure of national policy. The problem in NO is local leadership and
the helpless mentality of the New Orleans residents who get media
attention.
Mississippi had it worse if anything (whole towns here were completely
wiped
off the map), but you don't hear people referring to us as a symptom of
some
sort of national malaise. And the reason why is that our leadership made
the decision that we would pick ourselves up by our bootstraps and get
back
to work, whether or not there was any aid at the federal level. New
Orleans
chose a different path--even worse, they chose to keep the mayor who'd
failed them so badly in power.

Why is it we can spend $100 Billion on building Iraq, but not $2 billion
on
our own nation?


Bush has a guilty conscience

"George Conklin" wrote in message
k.net...

"Amy Blankenship" wrote in message
. ..

"Bill" wrote in message
...
donquijote1954 wrote:

You even find them in the environmental movement, feeding the hungry
children in Timbuktu and in the promotion of democracy for Iraq...

For example:

(this is serious)

'For the Bush administration, democracy promotion is not just a "made
in the U.S." venture, but a goal shared with many other countries. We
also seek to broaden our partnerships with local and global
nongovernmental organizations and international organizations, so that
we can work together on democracy promotion, advancement of human
rights, and humanitarian relief.'

No ****. Bush seems to think he can blow smoke up everybodies ass.
Other countries share the goal of not having to listen to American B.S.
We have no REAL partnerships because they will **** on us and change
sides
as soon as it is to their advantage. 'Partner' is a word that is way
overused in business. Your 'partner' can switch overnight and put you
out
of business. China is not a partner or friend but they love our money.
Democracy promotion is reserved for those with oil for us.
Advancement of human rights is just politician rhetoric.
Humanitarian relief means sending our money to a country that does not
appreciate it, all for a news byte, and while ignoring the problems at
home, like New Orleans, the homeless in OUR country, etc.

I get really tired of people talking about New Orleans like it's some
sort
of failure of national policy. The problem in NO is local leadership and
the helpless mentality of the New Orleans residents who get media
attention.
Mississippi had it worse if anything (whole towns here were completely
wiped
off the map), but you don't hear people referring to us as a symptom of
some
sort of national malaise. And the reason why is that our leadership made
the decision that we would pick ourselves up by our bootstraps and get
back
to work, whether or not there was any aid at the federal level. New
Orleans
chose a different path--even worse, they chose to keep the mayor who'd
failed them so badly in power.


You mean living below sea level has nothing to do with floods? ha Ha HA.

If the national government had refused to put up the levees to support the
local decision to build there, the criticism would have been 10 times worse.

"George Conklin" wrote in message
k.net...
....
I take it that you have never read "The Revenge of the Methodist
Biycle Company"? John Kane, Kingston ON Canada


I read honest demography, not propaganda.

Translation: I only read things I know in advance will support the viewpoint
I already had.