NYC Bike Laws (was: Stand UP! for TIME'S UP! -- and for YOUR Freedoms)

http://www.dot.state.ny.us/pubtrans/share.html
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Thank you.

=v= Folks should know that while much of the New York State
law above applies in New York City, some of it does not.
Here's a handy resource describing where things differ:

http://www.times-up.org/bike_legal_faq.php

=v= Some of this was clarified in court last December (when NYC
was sued for seizing bicycles without due process, and attempted
to countersue for an injunction against Critical Mass). It came
out in court that the NYPD were trying to enforce laws that did
not apply in NYC.
_Jym_

P.S.: This thread has sidetracked, so I changed the title. You
should still donate to the TIME'S UP! Bike Legal Defense Fund,
in part because it supports the very same lawyers who exposed
that the NYPD was enforcing inapplicable laws against biking!

http://www.times-up.org/legal_newswire.php

"Jym Dyer" wrote in message
m...
http://www.dot.state.ny.us/pubtrans/share.html
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Thank you.

=v= Folks should know that while much of the New York State
law above applies in New York City, some of it does not.
Here's a handy resource describing where things differ:

http://www.times-up.org/bike_legal_faq.php

That is not a legal refereance at all.

Why are you quoting biased, non-legal sources?
(to get lawyers involved)

=v= Some of this was clarified in court last December (when NYC
was sued for seizing bicycles without due process, and attempted
to countersue for an injunction against Critical Mass). It came
out in court that the NYPD were trying to enforce laws that did
not apply in NYC.
_Jym_

References?


P.S.: This thread has sidetracked, so I changed the title. You
should still donate to the TIME'S UP! Bike Legal Defense Fund,
in part because it supports the very same lawyers who exposed
that the NYPD was enforcing inapplicable laws against biking!

http://www.times-up.org/legal_newswire.php

So, it really is a fund to support NYC lawyers.
Society's leaches
More Gobbly gook to get money from suckers.
"Your rights are being violated!, give me $5, and I'll fix it for you, you
will feel better."
What an obvious scam.

VictorNYC wrote:
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message
m...
http://www.dot.state.ny.us/pubtrans/share.html
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Thank you.

=v= Folks should know that while much of the New York State
law above applies in New York City, some of it does not.
Here's a handy resource describing where things differ:

http://www.times-up.org/bike_legal_faq.php

That is not a legal refereance at all.

The man said "handy resource", not legal reference. However, he does
quote the applicable state and city statutes. So where's the problem?

Why are you quoting biased, non-legal sources?
(to get lawyers involved)

Please show me _anything_ that isn't biased. And provide your legal
"refereances".

What's not biased? The things that are held up to be honorable,
like...Religion? Politics? Your mom? Just because something is
biased, doesn't automatically mean it's incorrect, nor incorrect.

R

"RicodJour" wrote in message
oups.com...
VictorNYC wrote:
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message
m...
http://www.dot.state.ny.us/pubtrans/share.html
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Thank you.

=v= Folks should know that while much of the New York State
law above applies in New York City, some of it does not.
Here's a handy resource describing where things differ:

http://www.times-up.org/bike_legal_faq.php

That is not a legal refereance at all.

The man said "handy resource", not legal reference. However, he does
quote the applicable state and city statutes. So where's the problem?

It is "filtered" information, and does *not* quote the applicable state
and/or city laws.
It is not a legal reference, any lawyer even a NYC lawyer will tell you
that.



Why are you quoting biased, non-legal sources?
(to get lawyers involved)

Please show me _anything_ that isn't biased. And provide your legal
"refereances".

That is what I asked, but You have not and refuse to provide it.
Apparently, they cannot either.
No one can verify the information posted is true.
So it cannot be trusted.


What's not biased?
The things that are held up to be honorable,
like...Religion? Politics? Your mom? Just because something is
biased, doesn't automatically mean it's incorrect, nor incorrect.

"Just because something is biased, doesn't automatically mean it's
incorrect, nor incorrect."
Those are all Your words, WTF are you talking about moron?

= Your mom is biased and incorrect, and has no legal references either.
Does this make you a ******* or an illegal?

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:40:08 -0500 in rec.bicycles.soc,
"VictorNYC" wrote:

Does this make you a ******* or an illegal?

just another anti-bike troll. PLONK!

"Dennis P. Harris" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:40:08 -0500 in rec.bicycles.soc,
"VictorNYC" wrote:

Does this make you a ******* or an illegal?

just another anti-bike troll. PLONK!



This thread WAS about making Lawyers richer.

So, it really is a fund to support NYC lawyers.
Society's leaches
More Gobbly gook to get money from suckers.
"Your rights are being violated!, give me $5, and I'll fix it for you, you
will feel better."
What an obvious scam.

VictorNYC wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message
VictorNYC wrote:
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message
http://www.dot.state.ny.us/pubtrans/share.html
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Thank you.

=v= Folks should know that while much of the New York State
law above applies in New York City, some of it does not.
Here's a handy resource describing where things differ:

http://www.times-up.org/bike_legal_faq.php

That is not a legal refereance at all.

The man said "handy resource", not legal reference. However, he
does
quote the applicable state and city statutes. So where's the
problem?

It is "filtered" information, and does *not* quote the applicable
state
and/or city laws.
It is not a legal reference, any lawyer even a NYC lawyer will tell
you
that.

Reading challenged? That handy resource includes this link:
http://nyc.gov/html/dot/pdf/trafrule.pdf
That's the NYC web site, isn't it? That's only a step or two short of
Bloomberg showing up at your door with the statutes carved in stone.

Why are you quoting biased, non-legal sources?
(to get lawyers involved)

Please show me _anything_ that isn't biased. And provide your
legal
"refereances".

That is what I asked, but You have not and refuse to provide it.
Apparently, they cannot either.
No one can verify the information posted is true.
So it cannot be trusted.

Before you get on your high horse, read the stuff. In addition to the
link above, there were these links (and before you go jumping to
conclusions, I just included the link titles (I can't do ALL of your
work for you)), all of them reference the organizations' web site -
there is nothing filtered:
New York State Department of Transportation
New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
State University of New York at Buffalo School of Law

What's not biased?
The things that are held up to be honorable,
like...Religion? Politics? Your mom? Just because something is
biased, doesn't automatically mean it's incorrect, nor incorrect.

"Just because something is biased, doesn't automatically mean it's
incorrect, nor incorrect."
Those are all Your words, WTF are you talking about moron?

It's called a typo, a common, albeit avoidable, mistake made while
typing.

Thanks for capitalizing "Your", but it isn't really necessary. Have a
pleasant whatever.

R