|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
On Jul 24, 10:32 pm, Howard Kveck wrote:
7) Al Gore took money from the ChiComs. Speaking of irony: Al Gore has a book titled "Assault on Reason" Speaking of amusing: Borders had Al Gore's books in the science section. (Sorta like having Castenada in the anthro section.) r r skools failin us? Anyway, good for Razmansun today. Levi did about the best I've ever seen him do. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
wrote in message
ups.com... On Jul 24, 7:35 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "Ryan Cousineau" wrote in message "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: I did the Windmill Century this last weekend and spotted a titanium frame that was really well made. I asked the owner who made it and he said that it was a frame like http://www.habcycles.com/index.html The welds were cleaner than the one's on my Litespeed manufactured Eddy Merckx EX Pro. The geometry visually appeared identical. They could have been the same bike but his had cleaner welds. That's because the Chinese welders are supermotivated! Ah, I'm so bad. Seriously, a club-mate has a Habanero road frame, and he is very happy with it. They're a great value, and it's a nice material. Dumbass of the Month Club winner Ryan doesn't know that these are Russian bikes. Koach Kunich, Was it a Habanero Cycles frame, http://www.habcycles.com/index.html, or was it just "like" one? Because not only are Habaneros made in China, not Russia, but the owner and proprietor of Habanero, Mark Hickey, used to post in rbr and rbt until our own JFT sent him to Usenet Guantanamo. Maybe you should get a neurological checkup. It was LIKE a Habanero and it was build supposedly in Russia which was where I thought Habanero's were built as well. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
On Jul 25, 10:54 am, Thurston Howell IV
wrote: On Jul 24, 8:35 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "Ryan Cousineau" wrote That's because the Chinese welders are supermotivated! Dumbass of the Month Club winner Ryan doesn't know that these are Russian bikes. From the Habanero website: Build quality. The frames are fabricated by an honest-to-goodness aerospace builder in China, not some cookie-cutter bike frame factory. The welders are aerospace certified and have 10-15 years of experience (compare that with most builders). Their attention to detail and experience shines through in the fantastic single pass welds, and in the construction and alignment of all of the frame's components. They're also a great group of people that I am honored to work with. Plus, having lived in and traveled to China over the last 10+ years, I've seen the difference that the free market economy is making in the lives of the Chinese people, and I'm proud Habanero is a (small) part of that. Way to go Kunich. I'm coming up on 5 years myself. If you ever get down to Hainan Island, give me a call. 86 1351 883 8911 Ask for Meigui, Marian, or Miriam but please don't ask for Rose cause I hate it when people call me that. -M (I figure if I can get phone calls from people who got my phone number from bike shops that got it from someone in a bike club who got it from someone else who thinks I'm a Chinese girl that speaks really good English and likes bikes then it is useless even pretending that the number is anything resembling private and is therefore safe to post.) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
I think that Hickey figured out that while there may be bigger, stupider time-sinks than Usenet, it would take an effort to find them. Don't worry, according to Hawking all your time that gets sucked into the rbr blackhole will eventually escape (is Hawking a mathematician who dopes or an astrophysicist on amphetamines ?) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
On Jul 26, 2:57 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote:
I briefly considered buying a Habanero but stopped because I wondered what Hickey would be like if anyone ever disagreed with him about needing warranty service. I briefly considered hiring a based-in-France data analyst, but stopped because I wondered if his work routinely exhibited the lack of data density in the "Coalition Deaths" chart. Ah. You haven't been thinking "small multiples." Speaking of which, http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/bringemon4.png |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
In article ,
Donald Munro wrote: Ryan Cousineau wrote: I think that Hickey figured out that while there may be bigger, stupider time-sinks than Usenet, it would take an effort to find them. Don't worry, according to Hawking all your time that gets sucked into the rbr blackhole will eventually escape (is Hawking a mathematician who dopes or an astrophysicist on amphetamines ?) I think he has a medical waiver either way. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
In article . com,
wrote: On Jul 26, 2:57 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote: I briefly considered buying a Habanero but stopped because I wondered what Hickey would be like if anyone ever disagreed with him about needing warranty service. I briefly considered hiring a based-in-France data analyst, but stopped because I wondered if his work routinely exhibited the lack of data density in the "Coalition Deaths" chart. Ah. You haven't been thinking "small multiples." Speaking of which, http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/bringemon4.png Small multiples, yes, but what does this chart indicate other than that cumulative death tallies always rise? What I really want to know is when the death rate was high or low. The stairstep sizes help with the idea (you can see the really deadly or quiet reporting periods), but if you want the trend line, it's not clear. I want to know when the death rate went higher or lower than normal, and whether the long term trend is rising or falling. Even that wouldn't affect the data density much, but I think it would illuminate the most interesting thing this data carries. That, and the cumulative total, which being a single number, doesn't bear charting. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
On Jul 27, 4:31 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote:
In article . com, wrote: On Jul 26, 2:57 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote: I briefly considered buying a Habanero but stopped because I wondered what Hickey would be like if anyone ever disagreed with him about needing warranty service. I briefly considered hiring a based-in-France data analyst, but stopped because I wondered if his work routinely exhibited the lack of data density in the "Coalition Deaths" chart. Ah. You haven't been thinking "small multiples." Speaking of which, http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/bringemon4.png Small multiples, yes, but what does this chart indicate other than that cumulative death tallies always rise? What I really want to know is when the death rate was high or low. The stairstep sizes help with the idea (you can see the really deadly or quiet reporting periods), but if you want the trend line, it's not clear. I want to know when the death rate went higher or lower than normal, and whether the long term trend is rising or falling. Even that wouldn't affect the data density much, but I think it would illuminate the most interesting thing this data carries. That, and the cumulative total, which being a single number, doesn't bear charting. On the day my daughter was born I took a photo of her hand in mine. Not much data density: poorly lit photo of a baby's hand in an adult's. However, I take a photo of her hand in mine each year on her birthday. Thus far, the series is still short. Each single photo carries little information. The photos in series are more interesting; I hope that in twenty years (if the series lasts that long) they will be far more interesting. I actually now use the graph as an example for "when is smooth too smooth?" to illustrate how the eye and brain process visual data. It didn't start that way: when I started the graph the riser height of each step was much clearer. I never thought the number of stairs would be so large and that's part of the story, both in terms of visual decoding and also data density. I've had to rescale the axes several times, and that's part of the story, too. And, to come back to your question about when the numbers of deaths are high or low, I had posted this back when the President was promoting The Surge: http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/deathsbymonth.png There had been clear seasonality in the coalition death tolls, so one would think there is also seasonality in overall violence (not just deaths of coalition soldiers). If so, then evaluating the effect of The Surge (either on coalition deaths or more generally on overall violence) should also take into account seasonality. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Something More Upbeat
In article . com,
wrote: On Jul 27, 4:31 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote: In article . com, wrote: On Jul 26, 2:57 am, Ryan Cousineau wrote: I briefly considered buying a Habanero but stopped because I wondered what Hickey would be like if anyone ever disagreed with him about needing warranty service. I briefly considered hiring a based-in-France data analyst, but stopped because I wondered if his work routinely exhibited the lack of data density in the "Coalition Deaths" chart. Ah. You haven't been thinking "small multiples." Speaking of which, http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/bringemon4.png Small multiples, yes, but what does this chart indicate other than that cumulative death tallies always rise? What I really want to know is when the death rate was high or low. The stairstep sizes help with the idea (you can see the really deadly or quiet reporting periods), but if you want the trend line, it's not clear. I want to know when the death rate went higher or lower than normal, and whether the long term trend is rising or falling. Even that wouldn't affect the data density much, but I think it would illuminate the most interesting thing this data carries. That, and the cumulative total, which being a single number, doesn't bear charting. An apology in advance he my notes will be curt, not because your post doesn't deserve more time, but because I should be doing something else. On the day my daughter was born I took a photo of her hand in mine. Not much data density: poorly lit photo of a baby's hand in an adult's. However, I take a photo of her hand in mine each year on her birthday. Thus far, the series is still short. Each single photo carries little information. The photos in series are more interesting; I hope that in twenty years (if the series lasts that long) they will be far more interesting. I daresay you took that photo for the affective value, especially in small multiples, rather than the data contained therein. But I wouldn't put it past you to take height-and-weight numbers at the same time . But...for both of you? I actually now use the graph as an example for "when is smooth too smooth?" to illustrate how the eye and brain process visual data. It didn't start that way: when I started the graph the riser height of each step was much clearer. I never thought the number of stairs would be so large and that's part of the story, both in terms of visual decoding and also data density. I've had to rescale the axes several times, and that's part of the story, too. I see your point about the interesting value of the stairstep rather than connecting the dots. And, to come back to your question about when the numbers of deaths are high or low, I had posted this back when the President was promoting The Surge: http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/deathsbymonth.png There had been clear seasonality in the coalition death tolls, so one would think there is also seasonality in overall violence (not just deaths of coalition soldiers). If so, then evaluating the effect of The Surge (either on coalition deaths or more generally on overall violence) should also take into account seasonality. How about small multiples of year over year death rates overlaid on a single January-December (or April-March) graph, thus showing both the ebb and flow of the annual death rate, and the year-over-year trends. Use a single colour in multiple shades, darkest=latest? -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|