Mountain Biking: "Such sports do not accomplish anything socially useful"

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:58:01 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Chris" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 8:01 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology. It is also
telling that you cannot produce any sources other than your own
website to support your assertion, which references another article
written under an assumed name with no citations at all.You know
nothing about science Mike.

A Ph.D. is a science degree. DUH! What is YOUR degree in, retard?

I know a person with a Ph.D. in history. Is history now considered
to be a science?




--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:58:01 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Chris" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 8:01 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology. It is also
telling that you cannot produce any sources other than your own
website to support your assertion, which references another article
written under an assumed name with no citations at all.You know
nothing about science Mike.

A Ph.D. is a science degree. DUH! What is YOUR degree in, retard?

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande\

Your Ph.D. means Phucking Dork. What do you have a do nothing degree,
given to you to just to get rid of you.

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...

I have a Ph.D. in science. You have NOTHING. One doesn't need a degree
in a subject to be an expert in it, but you have NEITHER.


You have a PhD from a Cracker Jack box.

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:53:27 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..
Mike would have us believe that the mere presence of the route is
damage,
and this is too dangerous to ignore. He is working to make your
legislators
believe that the mere presence of a route is damage. That is the danger.

That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. See http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.
--


I rest my case.

You don't have a case to rest. ORVers are BY FAR the lowest form of
human, if they can even be considered human. "Throw-back" is the term
that comes to mind.


QED

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:57:09 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:58:01 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Chris" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 8:01 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology. It is also
telling that you cannot produce any sources other than your own
website to support your assertion, which references another article
written under an assumed name with no citations at all.You know
nothing about science Mike.

A Ph.D. is a science degree. DUH! What is YOUR degree in, retard?

I know a person with a Ph.D. in history. Is history now considered
to be a science?

You know what I meant: " A Ph.D in Psychology".
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:31:35 -0600, "DI" wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:58:01 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:


"Chris" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 8:01 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology. It is also
telling that you cannot produce any sources other than your own
website to support your assertion, which references another article
written under an assumed name with no citations at all.You know
nothing about science Mike.

A Ph.D. is a science degree. DUH! What is YOUR degree in, retard?

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande\

Your Ph.D. means Phucking Dork. What do you have a do nothing degree,
given to you to just to get rid of you.

Thanks for demonstrating exactly what mountain bikers are like: you
guys will say ANYTHING, regardless of whether it's true or makes any
sense.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:55:25 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:14:47 -0800 (PST), Chris
wrote:

On Feb 14, 8:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology.

Irrelevant. Unlike you, I can be an expert in more than one subject,
which is why I have been invited to present papers at numerous
scientific conferences, including conferences on conservation biology.

Then you should be able to produce a citation to the conference
proceedings. Why don't you provide a few - real citations, not
a URL to some random web site such as your own.

Most conferences don't have a conference proceedings, which you would
know if you ever attended one. You are pretty pathetic, if you can't
do your own homework, and look them up.

ROTFMAO. Mike, you don't have a clue. Try Sigcomm, Infocom, or any
of the major conferences and they have conference proceedings.
Otherwise attendees from universities would not have a publication to
cite and wouldn't bother to attend.

BS. We were talking about SCIENCE. Those are professional conferences,
not scientific conferences.

You by contrast, are claiming to have given talks at conferences
but can't or won't give a citation, and expect others to find it.
Why is that? Is it so that, when nobody finds anything, you can
just claim the search was inadequate?

Either produce citations to the papers or be taken to be a liar.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:55:25 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:14:47 -0800 (PST), Chris
wrote:

On Feb 14, 8:01Â*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology.

Irrelevant. Unlike you, I can be an expert in more than one subject,
which is why I have been invited to present papers at numerous
scientific conferences, including conferences on conservation biology.

Then you should be able to produce a citation to the conference
proceedings. Why don't you provide a few - real citations, not
a URL to some random web site such as your own.

Most conferences don't have a conference proceedings, which you would
know if you ever attended one. You are pretty pathetic, if you can't
do your own homework, and look them up.

ROTFMAO. Mike, you don't have a clue. Try Sigcomm, Infocom, or any
of the major conferences and they have conference proceedings.
Otherwise attendees from universities would not have a publication to
cite and wouldn't bother to attend.

BS. We were talking about SCIENCE. Those are professional conferences,
not scientific conferences.

Sigh. Those are conferences geared towards researchers, including
ones at a variety of universities. These are not trade shows with
some attached talks. I've given talks at both in an area where
under 25 percent of the papers submitted are accepted, and where
most are from people working at universities.

You by contrast, are claiming to have given talks at conferences
but can't or won't give a citation, and expect others to find it.
Why is that? Is it so that, when nobody finds anything, you can
just claim the search was inadequate?

Either produce citations to the papers or be taken to be a liar.

Note Vandeman's lack of a response. :-)



--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:39:42 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:55:25 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0800, (Bill
Z.) wrote:

Mike Vandeman writes:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:14:47 -0800 (PST), Chris
wrote:

On Feb 14, 8:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
That's an established FACT, which you would know, if you knew ANYTHING
about biology. Seehttp://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1.

It is more telling that your degree is NOT in biology.

Irrelevant. Unlike you, I can be an expert in more than one subject,
which is why I have been invited to present papers at numerous
scientific conferences, including conferences on conservation biology.

Then you should be able to produce a citation to the conference
proceedings. Why don't you provide a few - real citations, not
a URL to some random web site such as your own.

Most conferences don't have a conference proceedings, which you would
know if you ever attended one. You are pretty pathetic, if you can't
do your own homework, and look them up.

ROTFMAO. Mike, you don't have a clue. Try Sigcomm, Infocom, or any
of the major conferences and they have conference proceedings.
Otherwise attendees from universities would not have a publication to
cite and wouldn't bother to attend.

BS. We were talking about SCIENCE. Those are professional conferences,
not scientific conferences.

Sigh. Those are conferences geared towards researchers, including
ones at a variety of universities. These are not trade shows with
some attached talks. I've given talks at both in an area where
under 25 percent of the papers submitted are accepted, and where
most are from people working at universities.

Except you.

Then how do you explain your lack of understanding of mountain biking
impacts, IN SPITE of having all the information readily available to
you?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

You do not hold a degree in environmental science.

Your degree only explains why you are considered a nutcase by everybody
else. The irony is, we don't need a dgree in psychology to know you need a
shrink, and yoiu have a degree in psychology, and you don't seem to know
that you need a shrink. Your degree doesn't seem to help you on very many
fronts.