A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Random Eye Tests



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 23rd 06, 06:08 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Danny Colyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,244
Default Random Eye Tests

Hurrah, I'd like to see more of this:
url:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/wales/south_east/5277958.stm

I was struck by the comment that:
"in Gwent last year there were 47 deaths and the police consider only
three of those to be related to speed - the rest is driver error."

How is speed not driver error, then?

--
Danny Colyer URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
Ads
  #2  
Old August 23rd 06, 06:28 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Budstaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 212
Default Random Eye Tests


"Danny Colyer" wrote in message
...
Hurrah, I'd like to see more of this:
url:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/wales/south_east/5277958.stm


Lo-res.... how quaint.

Hi-res version a bit difficult to see?? ;-)

joking aside, what a good idea. How on earth can anyone who can't pass the
sight requirement not be aware of things being a little difficult? It's
either a terminal lack of self- awareness, laziness, vanity or meanness in
the extreme (for they must either not know they need (new) glasses, not be
arsed to so anything about it, think they'd ruin their good looks, or not
value their life sufficiently).

After a period of awareness raising, bring on the prosecutions.


  #3  
Old August 23rd 06, 08:35 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Pinky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 270
Default Random Eye Tests


"Budstaff" wrote in message
...

"Danny Colyer" wrote in message
...
Hurrah, I'd like to see more of this:
url:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/wales/south_east/5277958.stm


Lo-res.... how quaint.

Hi-res version a bit difficult to see?? ;-)

joking aside, what a good idea. How on earth can anyone who can't pass
the sight requirement not be aware of things being a little difficult?
It's either a terminal lack of self- awareness, laziness, vanity or
meanness in the extreme (for they must either not know they need (new)
glasses, not be arsed to so anything about it, think they'd ruin their
good looks, or not value their life sufficiently).

After a period of awareness raising, bring on the prosecutions.


I am sure that many people do not realise how their eyesight changes.
In older folk it can happen unexpectedly -- well the changes take place
slowly but the perception is only noticed after a lapse of time!

This year during my long tour I suddenly realised that I could see better
( long distance) without my bifocals than with them. I knew I was due for my
annual eye test in August and I realised that my eye sight had undergone a
real change.
So I am wearing a new set of drastically different "specs" now with a
second pair specifically for cycling with "reactolite" lenses.

Bu the decision point isn't cut and dried. And it applies to cyclists as
well as motorists!

--
Trevor A Panther
In South Yorkshire,
England, United Kingdom.
www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk


  #4  
Old August 23rd 06, 09:45 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Phil Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default Random Eye Tests

Budstaff wrote:

joking aside, what a good idea. How on earth can anyone who can't pass the
sight requirement not be aware of things being a little difficult? It's
either a terminal lack of self- awareness, laziness, vanity or

meanness in
the extreme ...


or the other option: folk who don't need glasses generally have no idea
what those of us with glasses can see. Don't lump me in with the
self-denying blind bats or I'll start on you for red-light-jumping and
pavement-granny-bothering.

I am borderline for the driving test without glasses. Without my glasses
I have trouble with teletext from 15', or small town names on dual
carriageway signs until its nearly too late to respond. And thats it. I
can see how a white football is spinning 30 yards away, use my serious
camera, be a SCUBA instructor, work all day at a computer etc.

Friends try my glasses & come away with head spinning assuming I can't
see (because my prescription is mostly astigmas, i.e. localised
deformations of the eyeball), but I've had 210,000 hours of practise.

I can drive without glasses if needed, though I'd rather have them (and
my ABS), especially at night.

After a period of awareness raising, bring on the prosecutions.


agree with this bit though.
  #5  
Old August 23rd 06, 10:09 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Stevie D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 259
Default Random Eye Tests

Danny Colyer wrote:

Hurrah, I'd like to see more of this:
url:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/wales/south_east/5277958.stm


No excuse for SMIDSY!

I was struck by the comment that:
"in Gwent last year there were 47 deaths and the police consider only
three of those to be related to speed - the rest is driver error."

How is speed not driver error, then?


Excessive speed for the situation clearly _is_ driver error - I guess
their point is that most accidents are caused by mistakes other than
going too fast.

I don't like the statement either. If you're going to separate out
speeding, which is a very clear example of driver error, it seems
wrong to lump everything else together, which could include driving
while drunk - a very different type of error.

--
Stevie D
\\\\\ ///// Bringing dating agencies to the
\\\\\\\__X__/////// common hedgehog since 2001 - "HedgeHugs"
___\\\\\\\'/ \'///////_____________________________________________
  #6  
Old August 23rd 06, 11:55 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 81
Default Random Eye Tests


Excessive speed for the situation clearly _is_ driver error - I guess
their point is that most accidents are caused by mistakes other than
going too fast.


Of course if you are going fast enough to have a serious accident when
you make an error then speed is part of the problem at least.It is
always a factor in an an accident, except those where parked cars are
hit by meteors.
Perhaps they mean that there were 4 cases in which they could not avoid
noting that there was proof or admission of speeding over the limit.
Sounds like there may be a culture of speed excusers in that in that
force.Or the doctor is quoting selectively in order to mislead.That
could never happen could it?
TerryJ

  #7  
Old August 24th 06, 08:46 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Bennett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 75
Default Random Eye Tests

Budstaff wrote:
How on earth can anyone who can't
pass the sight requirement not be aware of things being a little
difficult?


You'd be amazed.y son was born with retinal colobomas, which means he has
large blindspots in both eyes (in photos he has 'white eye' rather than 'red
eye' as there are no light-sensitive cells in the colobomas). But you'd
never guess from watching him. It's amazing what the brain can do with very
little information.

So perhaps it's not surprising that people whose vision is deteriorating
don't always notice straight away.


  #8  
Old August 24th 06, 10:08 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Helen Deborah Vecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 596
Default Random Eye Tests

"Simon Bennett" typed


Budstaff wrote:
How on earth can anyone who can't
pass the sight requirement not be aware of things being a little
difficult?


You'd be amazed.y son was born with retinal colobomas, which means he has
large blindspots in both eyes (in photos he has 'white eye' rather
than 'red
eye' as there are no light-sensitive cells in the colobomas). But you'd
never guess from watching him. It's amazing what the brain can do with very
little information.


So perhaps it's not surprising that people whose vision is deteriorating
don't always notice straight away.



Indeed. There's a difference between vision and perception and the
ability to notice a cyclist at 10 metres may relate rather poorly to the
ability to read a number plate at 25 metres.

I should imagine your son may have some difficulty with the printed page
but seems like any other lad on the football field.

--
Helen D. Vecht:
Edgware.
  #9  
Old August 24th 06, 01:58 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Marz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 610
Default Random Eye Tests


Danny Colyer wrote:
Hurrah, I'd like to see more of this:
url:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/wales/south_east/5277958.stm

I was struck by the comment that:
"in Gwent last year there were 47 deaths and the police consider only
three of those to be related to speed - the rest is driver error."

How is speed not driver error, then?

--
Danny Colyer URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine


May because the police see speeding as a deliberate act as opposed to
an actual error of judgment. And therefore treat speeding as an act of
possible criminal intent and not an accident.

HA!

Made myself laugh.

Laters,

Marz

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effects of the rotor pedalling system on the performance of trained cyclists during incremental and constant-load cycle-ergometer tests. [email protected] Racing 1 March 29th 06 05:36 PM
Random Inaccuracy of Top Speed Measuring Ivar Hesselager General 9 September 5th 05 02:04 PM
Donati On Armstrong B. Lafferty Racing 38 September 3rd 05 01:35 AM
Frequent Negative Tests B. Lafferty Racing 9 August 27th 04 05:22 PM
Motoring groups oppose drink drive tests. Howard UK 15 May 29th 04 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.