Police get tough with scofflaws

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...t-31052013.htm

On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...t-31052013.htm

QUOTE:
....the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

On May 31, 11:39*am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:
On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On 1 jun, 11:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f....

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. * By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. *Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

Can you just confirm and guarantee that I will not turn up in Harwich?

On 01/06/2013 11:50, Justin wrote:
On 1 jun, 11:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

Can you just confirm and guarantee that I will not turn up in Harwich?

Could you just confirm that you didn't turn up at Dover, Marks Tey &
Gillingham?

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On 1 June, 10:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f....

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. * By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. *Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

the woman was arrested despite no witness that she had contravened any
regulation that applied to her and the location in the presence of
appropriate signage.

thirty-six wrote:
On 1 June, 10:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a
rush to get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had
not realised it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train
to work every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should
grow out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who
want to ride a bike."

the woman was arrested despite no witness that she had contravened any
regulation that applied to her and the location in the presence of
appropriate signage.

The witness was the person that detained her. tTaffic signage and the laws
applicable to them applies to traffic, bicycles are traffic. Would you like
a longer shovel?

On 02/06/2013 07:58, thirty-six wrote:
On 1 June, 10:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

the woman was arrested despite no witness that she had contravened any
regulation that applied to her and the location in the presence of
appropriate signage.

Apart from the police officer who witnessed the (alleged) offence, you
mean? And apart from her trying to abscond?

On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:
On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency

A police officer, you mean?

believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong

You have no reason for it to "seem" that way to you. Thinking is a
personal matter. The cyclist was arrested for seeking to leave the scene
of her observed breach of the law - that is, her illegal *action*, not
her improper thought.

and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

Really?

Do you believe that she didn't know that the street was one-way, despite
signage to say so (as there always is) and the her going that way to
work every day?

She should be convicted of attempted insult of the intelligence (I'll
exempt you from victimhood there - it seems that it didn't insult
yours), let alone anything else.