|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Aug 2004 21:37:37 -0500, Jim Smith
wrote: Maybe it would help if you imagined the tire half filled with water and half filled with air. We will do the experiment on earth so that gravity will ensure the air is in the top half of the tube, the water at the bottom. Now, put the valve stem at the top of the tire, load the bike, and add enough air to make the contact patch the same size as in a tire completely filled with water. At equilibrium the pressure is the same in the air as in the water[1], and since the bottom of the tire has know way of knowing what is going on in the top of the tire, this is the same pressure as in a tire completely filled with water. Right. When you load the bike, the air at the top compresses as the water (ok, pedant, RELATIVELY incompresssible water displaces some of the air). You must pressurize the air in order to prevent the tire from flatting in this case. Now, remove ALL the air. Pump in water under just enough pressure to expand the innertube firmly against the tire casing. What happens with nearly zero water pressure? larry |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Schuldt wrote:
On 23 Aug 2004 21:37:37 -0500, Jim Smith wrote: Maybe it would help if you imagined the tire half filled with water and half filled with air. We will do the experiment on earth so that gravity will ensure the air is in the top half of the tube, the water at the bottom. Now, put the valve stem at the top of the tire, load the bike, and add enough air to make the contact patch the same size as in a tire completely filled with water. At equilibrium the pressure is the same in the air as in the water[1], and since the bottom of the tire has know way of knowing what is going on in the top of the tire, this is the same pressure as in a tire completely filled with water. Right. When you load the bike, the air at the top compresses as the water (ok, pedant, RELATIVELY incompresssible water displaces some of the air). You must pressurize the air in order to prevent the tire from flatting in this case. Now, remove ALL the air. Pump in water under just enough pressure to expand the innertube firmly against the tire casing. What happens with nearly zero water pressure? That's where the "relatively incompressible" nature of water becomes important. That property means that it takes only a small change in volume to cause a very large change in pressure, unlike the case with air or other gasses where the two properties are inversely proportional and change by about the same amount (i.e. for gasses, half the volume = twice the pressure). So you start with the water at roughly ambient air pressure and now you reduce the volume slightly by putting a load on the tire and flattening the bottom portion of it. That reduction in volume results in a very large pressure increase in the water which is why the water-filled tire can support quite a load even if it had little pressure when unloaded. If you put a load of 100 lbs on the tire and it deforms to create a contact patch of two square inches, then the outer rubber surface at the bottom of the tire must be exerting an average pressure of 50 psi on the ground to support the load. The tire has very little rigidity itself, so if it's exerting that pressure on the ground, it must be feeling the same pressure from the water inside the tire, so the water pressure must also be 50 psi *when the tire has that load and contact patch*. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Aug 2004 21:37:37 -0500, Jim Smith wrote:
Larry Schuldt writes: On 22 Aug 2004 07:40:15 -0500, Jim Smith wrote: It is easy to verify that the pressure in the tire can not be close to zero as you say: just fill the tile with 0.0 psi of air and watch how the tires behave. The tires have no way of "knowing" if the pressure inside comes from air, water, blood, or some other fluid. Your clue to this is that none of the fluids properties appear in the equations which describe the tire at equilibrium. Not true. Air at 0 psi (relative to atmospheric) is readily compressible and the weight of the frame will cause the tire to deform (flat). Water is not compressible. I do not think you quite understand what it means for a fluid to be "compressible." Maybe it would help if you imagined the tire half filled with water and half filled with air. We will do the experiment on earth so that gravity will ensure the air is in the top half of the tube, the water at the bottom. Now, put the valve stem at the top of the tire, load the bike, and add enough air to make the contact patch the same size as in a tire completely filled with water. At equilibrium the pressure is the same in the air as in the water[1], and since the bottom of the tire has know way of knowing what is going on in the top of the tire, this is the same pressure as in a tire completely filled with water. Not at all. Your half air/water tire is a very different thing from one filled completely with water. Ride your tire over a bump and the air will be compressed. Ride one completely filled with water and the only give will be the rubber and carcass stretching. Ron |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
RonSonic writes:
On 23 Aug 2004 21:37:37 -0500, Jim Smith wrote: Larry Schuldt writes: On 22 Aug 2004 07:40:15 -0500, Jim Smith wrote: It is easy to verify that the pressure in the tire can not be close to zero as you say: just fill the tile with 0.0 psi of air and watch how the tires behave. The tires have no way of "knowing" if the pressure inside comes from air, water, blood, or some other fluid. Your clue to this is that none of the fluids properties appear in the equations which describe the tire at equilibrium. Not true. Air at 0 psi (relative to atmospheric) is readily compressible and the weight of the frame will cause the tire to deform (flat). Water is not compressible. I do not think you quite understand what it means for a fluid to be "compressible." Maybe it would help if you imagined the tire half filled with water and half filled with air. We will do the experiment on earth so that gravity will ensure the air is in the top half of the tube, the water at the bottom. Now, put the valve stem at the top of the tire, load the bike, and add enough air to make the contact patch the same size as in a tire completely filled with water. At equilibrium the pressure is the same in the air as in the water[1], and since the bottom of the tire has know way of knowing what is going on in the top of the tire, this is the same pressure as in a tire completely filled with water. Not at all. Your half air/water tire is a very different thing from one filled completely with water. Ride your tire over a bump and the air will be compressed. Ride one completely filled with water and the only give will be the rubber and carcass stretching. I was speaking of a tire at rest. I should have been more clear and said "at equilibrium and at rest" instead of just saying "at equilibrium." So, we have the tire at rest, loaded, half filled with water, and at equilibrium (steady state). Adjust the air pressure to obtain a contact patch which is identical to that of a tire completely filled with water. The pressure in the two tires will be the same. Picture a hydraulic lift or jack. The pressure required to lift a given weight is independent of the fluid used. Does not matter if it is oil, water, air, maple syrup, blood... makes no difference. Yep, for a tire filled with an incompressible fluid the compliance (dV/dP) of the tire is going to determine the pressure inside. The smaller the compliance the higher the pressure is going to be for a given load. That is why I suspect the water filled tire will have even higher pressure than the air filled tire. Of course, it will be possible to adjust the pressure in the water filled tires any value desired within reason, but expect the pressure to behave quite differently under changing loads than the air filled tire. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Exploding tube | - | General | 8 | August 21st 04 03:37 PM |
Frame fit: which is more important - Frame height vs. top tube length? | S o r n i | Techniques | 18 | July 9th 04 07:17 AM |
When to change the tire | Jose Capco | Techniques | 10 | July 1st 04 08:15 PM |
Threaded versus threadless headset | Hjalmar Duklęt | General | 64 | August 29th 03 06:55 PM |