#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
Bicyclist standing with bike hit by tractor trailer at intersection http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=238033&nid=25 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
"Badger_South" wrote in message ... Bicyclist standing with bike hit by tractor trailer at intersection http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=238033&nid=25 I remember Constitution ave. It scared the crap out of me as a pedestrian! DC drivers hug the curbs so close they're practically on the sidewalk. Small wonder there aren't more accidents there. I was scared just crossing the street! Recently, there have been a couple of bike-car accidents that weren't fatal, but bad, and in both cases were actually brought on by really dumb bikers who were on roads where I'd never go- busy like Constitution. In one case, a guy was on a bike, 3 am, no helmet, no flashers, went through a red light and headfirst into a windshield. ANd he'd been drinking. He had bad head injuries but not killed. Sorry, but that is just dumb- why not put a gun in your mouth? .In the other case a guy was riding his bike on a busy boulevard where no sane person would ride a bike, also at night, no helmet, went through an intersection and was hit by a car, but miraculously not badly hurt. A girl was killed on that boulevard a few years ago, also at night, hit from behind on her bike.Even during the day I'd never ride a bike there! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
I love that the quick article is about the fact taht traffic is going to be
shut down for a while, not that a truck plowed into some guy waiting at a red light with his bike or something. Mike "Badger_South" wrote in message ... Bicyclist standing with bike hit by tractor trailer at intersection http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=238033&nid=25 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:36:58 -0400, "Mike Beauchamp"
wrote: I love that the quick article is about the fact taht traffic is going to be shut down for a while, not that a truck plowed into some guy waiting at a red light with his bike or something. Its the web site for a television station and that tends to be the focus that time of the morning.They tend to be the same way short of four or five deaths all at once. Although how 5:50 am became prime driving, even in DC, I can't guess. 7:00 am on is more like prime. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:30:05 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:36:58 -0400, "Mike Beauchamp" wrote: I love that the quick article is about the fact taht traffic is going to be shut down for a while, not that a truck plowed into some guy waiting at a red light with his bike or something. Its the web site for a television station and that tends to be the focus that time of the morning.They tend to be the same way short of four or five deaths all at once. Although how 5:50 am became prime driving, even in DC, I can't guess. 7:00 am on is more like prime. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... It's getting earlier. I left Va Beach, thinking to miss the traffic, at 0445 on Monday, and the traffic was already very heavy and there had been one accident. It's getting so I only travel early Sunday morning and there's still a lot of traffic by 0730 heading across the tunnel (typically lots of vans and guys towing boats) -B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
Marlene Blanshay wrote:
I remember Constitution ave. It scared the crap out of me as a pedestrian! DC drivers hug the curbs so close they're practically on the sidewalk. Small wonder there aren't more accidents there. I was scared just crossing the street! Well, different people have different levels of skill and different tolerance for risk. The fact you were scared isn't absolute proof of danger. I've ridden Constitution Ave with no problem (but admittedly not at rush hour). Recently, there have been a couple of bike-car accidents that weren't fatal, but bad, and in both cases were actually brought on by really dumb bikers who were on roads where I'd never go- busy like Constitution. In one case, a guy was on a bike, 3 am, no helmet, no flashers, went through a red light and headfirst into a windshield. ANd he'd been drinking. He had bad head injuries but not killed. Sorry, but that is just dumb- why not put a gun in your mouth? .In the other case a guy was riding his bike on a busy boulevard where no sane person would ride a bike, also at night, no helmet, went through an intersection and was hit by a car, but miraculously not badly hurt. Since you brought it up: It's too bad those guys weren't wearing helmets! Two great opportunities for "My helmet saved my life!!!" stories. You hate to see them squandered like that! More seriously: Why not discuss behavior that really makes a difference? In the first case, you had plenty to address with the drinking, the lack of lights and the running of the red light. In the second case, you haven't shown the cyclist did anything wrong at all. Implying he's insane just because he does what you wouldn't do is wrong. Keep in mind that there are motorists who use your "logic" against _any_ cyclist who gets hurt in _any_ circumstance. Your version is only a little less intolerant. -- --------------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com, replace with cc.ysu dot edu] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
Badger_South wrote:
Bicyclist standing with bike hit by tractor trailer at intersection http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=238033&nid=25 It sounds to me like it was a pedestrian that was hit. He happened to be standing there with a bicycle. This is an important distinction. Someone needs to notify the "walking" discussion groups, so the proper amount of fear can be spread among pedestrians. In fact, this needs to be done for each of the 6,500 pedestrians killed each year in the US. -- --------------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com, replace with cc.ysu dot edu] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:56:56 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote: Badger_South wrote: Bicyclist standing with bike hit by tractor trailer at intersection http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=238033&nid=25 It sounds to me like it was a pedestrian that was hit. He happened to be standing there with a bicycle. This is an important distinction. Someone needs to notify the "walking" discussion groups, so the proper amount of fear can be spread among pedestrians. In fact, this needs to be done for each of the 6,500 pedestrians killed each year in the US. You're of course correct, it's really a pedestrian fatality. However we post bike-related fatalities not to show that biking is dangerous, but to honor and note a fallen comrade; or at least that's why I posted it. -B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
"Frank Krygowski" wrote in message ... Marlene Blanshay wrote: I remember Constitution ave. It scared the crap out of me as a pedestrian! DC drivers hug the curbs so close they're practically on the sidewalk. Small wonder there aren't more accidents there. I was scared just crossing the street! Well, different people have different levels of skill and different tolerance for risk. The fact you were scared isn't absolute proof of danger. I've ridden Constitution Ave with no problem (but admittedly not at rush hour). Recently, there have been a couple of bike-car accidents that weren't fatal, but bad, and in both cases were actually brought on by really dumb bikers who were on roads where I'd never go- busy like Constitution. In one case, a guy was on a bike, 3 am, no helmet, no flashers, went through a red light and headfirst into a windshield. ANd he'd been drinking. He had bad head injuries but not killed. Sorry, but that is just dumb- why not put a gun in your mouth? .In the other case a guy was riding his bike on a busy boulevard where no sane person would ride a bike, also at night, no helmet, went through an intersection and was hit by a car, but miraculously not badly hurt. Since you brought it up: It's too bad those guys weren't wearing helmets! Two great opportunities for "My helmet saved my life!!!" stories. You hate to see them squandered like that! More seriously: Why not discuss behavior that really makes a difference? In the first case, you had plenty to address with the drinking, the lack of lights and the running of the red light. In the second case, you haven't shown the cyclist did anything wrong at all. Implying he's insane just because he does what you wouldn't do is wrong. Keep in mind that there are motorists who use your "logic" against _any_ cyclist who gets hurt in _any_ circumstance. Your version is only a little less intolerant. I am not the same as motorists who think all cyclists are 'bad' and it's ridiculous to lump me with those morons. The second cyclist showed incredibly poor judgement. It turned out that the driver wasn't at fault, it was the cyclist who went through a red light, not wearing a helmet, at night on a boulevard which is dangerous at any hour. You'd have to live in this city to know that road anyways- it's one of those that you'd avoid at all costs if you value your life. Around here, we call cyclists like those poor guys "organ donors". There are certain circumstances where you're basically playing with a loaded gun, and that's not intolerance, it's just a fact. As for Constitution ave, it's probably a lot less dangerous for drivers than it is for cyclists or pedestrians. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fatality in D.C.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:00:31 -0400, Badger_South
wrote: You're of course correct, it's really a pedestrian fatality. However we post bike-related fatalities not to show that biking is dangerous, but to honor and note a fallen comrade; or at least that's why I posted it. I don't want to hear about fatalities here, nor do I want the google to record nothing but fatality reports. The ignorant will believe that we're doing nothing more than writing bad hagiographies for martyrs to the cause. I'm sure there are many other newsgroups for that purpose--newsgroups whose martyrs prefer more explosive exits from this world. Every fatality post generates the same traffic, which falls into a few basically recognizeable types: 1) Anti-car screeds. The motorist is ALWAYS in the wrong. ALL cars must be melted down into slag. 2) "I-told-you-so", which comes in several sub-variants: 2a) He should have been wearing a helmet. 2b) He shouldn't have been riding in the road/sidewalk (delete as appropriate) 2c) He shouldn't have been on that road (and I know, I've DRIVEN there) 3) Spurious appeals to statistical evidence 4) Statements of defiance. I here submit my own version of number 4: I'm sad that someone had to die on Con. Ave. The main avenues in the District are wide, heavy, and probably sub-optimal cycle routes. But then, I've ridden (and seen many other people ride) far busier (in terms of total motor vehicle volume, or gross tonnage, or any other way you want to slice it) roads in London--The Elephant & Castle Roundabout at rush hour, say, or The Strand--and had no problems, provided my bike behaves like the rest of vehicular traffic. In the case in question, I don't have enough data to apportion blame. People die in car wrecks all the time; it doesn't stop me or my friends from driving. People die in plane crashes all the time; it doesn't stop me from flying. People die all the time--it doesn't stop me from living. -Luigi www.livejournal.com/users/ouij Photos, Rants, Raves |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Helmet : jury is out. | Walter Mitty | General | 125 | June 26th 04 02:00 AM |
Another Fayetteville fatality | Horace | General | 3 | October 25th 03 06:59 PM |
Yet another traffic fatality | Horace | General | 13 | October 8th 03 08:36 PM |