A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old July 14th 19, 01:09 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,399
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text.

You quoted this:

"...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for
her to cross..."

Then you asked:

"If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?"

You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying
when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went
green for her to cross...".

Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green.
I look forward to reading your apology.

I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused
them of lying. That was you.


You still need to provide evidence to support this claim.
I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green.


...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the
pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green.


No, just asking for evidence that it was.

If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian?


He might.

And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes.

"We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology.


You accused the police of lying.


A claim you still need to prove.


*You* proved it by doing it.

I owe them no apology, not having
accused them of anything.


Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology.


Act your age.

Ads
  #32  
Old July 14th 19, 01:16 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,297
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text.

You quoted this:

"...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for
her to cross..."

Then you asked:

"If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?"

You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying
when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went
green for her to cross...".

Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green.
I look forward to reading your apology.

I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused
them of lying. That was you.


You still need to provide evidence to support this claim.
I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green.

...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the
pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green.


No, just asking for evidence that it was.

If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian?


He might.

And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes.

"We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology.

You accused the police of lying.


A claim you still need to prove.


*You* proved it by doing it.


So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim.


I owe them no apology, not having
accused them of anything.


Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology.


Act your age.


I am, unlike you.


  #33  
Old July 14th 19, 01:57 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,399
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text.

You quoted this:

"...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for
her to cross..."

Then you asked:

"If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?"

You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying
when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went
green for her to cross...".

Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green.
I look forward to reading your apology.

I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused
them of lying. That was you.


You still need to provide evidence to support this claim.
I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green.

...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the
pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green.

No, just asking for evidence that it was.

If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian?


He might.

And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes.

"We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology.

You accused the police of lying.

A claim you still need to prove.


*You* proved it by doing it.


So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim.


The claim that you think the police are lying?

*You* provided that, with your questioning of it.

It's way too late for you to think of withdrawing it.

I owe them no apology, not having
accused them of anything.

Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology.


Act your age.


I am, unlike you.


Pathetic.
  #34  
Old July 14th 19, 02:23 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,297
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text.

You quoted this:

"...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for
her to cross..."

Then you asked:

"If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?"

You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying
when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went
green for her to cross...".

Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green.
I look forward to reading your apology.

I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused
them of lying. That was you.


You still need to provide evidence to support this claim.
I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green.

...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the
pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green.

No, just asking for evidence that it was.

If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian?

He might.

And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes.

"We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology.

You accused the police of lying.

A claim you still need to prove.

*You* proved it by doing it.


So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim.


The claim that you think the police are lying?

*You* provided that, with your questioning of it.

It's way too late for you to think of withdrawing it.


Still waiting for your evidence.


I owe them no apology, not having
accused them of anything.

Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology.

Act your age.


I am, unlike you.


Pathetic.


W^5



  #35  
Old July 14th 19, 09:22 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


Act your age.


I am, unlike you.


Pathetic.


W^5


Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.

  #36  
Old July 14th 19, 06:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,297
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


Act your age.

I am, unlike you.

Pathetic.


W^5


Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.


Nugents takes itselves far too seriously.


  #37  
Old July 14th 19, 06:49 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,364
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


Act your age.

I am, unlike you.

Pathetic.

W^5


Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.


Nugents takes itselves far too seriously.


Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very
easily exposes you as being a prat.
You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be.

Cycling is painfully slow.
Involves great physical effort.
You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather.
Makes you sweaty & smelly.
Cause piles.
Reduces sperm count.
Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie.
Unable to carry passengers or goods.
People laugh at you.
Makes you a sponging freeloader.
Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic.
Pedestrians hate you.
Drivers hate you.







  #38  
Old July 14th 19, 07:38 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,297
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 6:49:59 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Act your age.

I am, unlike you.

Pathetic.

W^5

Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.


Nugents takes itselves far too seriously.


Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very
easily exposes you as being a prat.
You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be.

Cycling is painfully slow.
Involves great physical effort.
You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather.
Makes you sweaty & smelly.
Cause piles.
Reduces sperm count.
Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie.
Unable to carry passengers or goods.
People laugh at you.
Makes you a sponging freeloader.
Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic.
Pedestrians hate you.
Drivers hate you.





W^5
  #39  
Old July 14th 19, 08:48 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,062
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On 14/07/2019 19:38, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 6:49:59 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Act your age.

I am, unlike you.

Pathetic.

W^5

Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.
so
Nugents takes itselves far too seriously.


Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very
easily exposes you as being a prat.
You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be.

Cycling is painfully slow.
Involves great physical effort.
You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather.
Makes you sweaty & smelly.
Cause piles.
Reduces sperm count.
Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie.
Unable to carry passengers or goods.
People laugh at you.
Makes you a sponging freeloader.
Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic.
Pedestrians hate you.
Drivers hate you.





W^5

Also W5H :-)


--
Bod
  #40  
Old July 15th 19, 09:37 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,209
Default RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers

On 14. 7. 2019 19:49, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Act your age.

I am, unlike you.

Pathetic.

W^5

Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's
head explode.


Nugents takes itselves far too seriously.


Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very
easily exposes you as being a prat.
You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be.

Cycling is painfully slow.
Involves great physical effort.
You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather.
Makes you sweaty & smelly.
Cause piles.
Reduces sperm count.
Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie.
Unable to carry passengers or goods.
People laugh at you.
Makes you a sponging freeloader.
Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic.
Pedestrians hate you.
Drivers hate you.







I am a bicyclist.
Get used to it.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6 foot tall scumbag cyclist hospitalises OAP MrCheerful UK 24 April 5th 19 02:18 PM
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers Mrcheerful UK 38 January 29th 16 07:51 AM
Hull cyclist mows down OAP and scarpers Mrcheerful UK 4 October 22nd 14 09:33 AM
Cyclist hospitalises 70 y/o waiting for a bus Mrcheerful UK 1 September 29th 14 08:02 PM
Cyclist causes a crash and scarpers Mrcheerful UK 11 November 7th 13 09:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.