A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Recumbent Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Action Bent Tadpole Trike: Has anybody ridden one?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old August 2nd 05, 03:43 AM
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Grippe" wrote in message
...

"HHS" wrote in message
...


Life could be taxing for these children. So it would be better if we
kill them now. They would eventually die anyway after a "quite
unpleasant" life. Have I got that right?

Of course the fetuses don't have a voice or a say in this matter. My
question was hypothetical. Your answer is they can't respond to
questions so they don't get to have a choice. We knew that already.


Read my response to Ed Dolan for more details but briefly

1. A fetus is not a child. It can not live at all without a host. It is
not a human life. Abortion of a fetus is a medical procedure and not
"killing".


Wrong on every count. With an idiot like Jeff, it is all semantics. That
must be a Jewish thing. Were the Jews "murdered" in the concentration camps
or were they just "liquidated."

2. The fetus does not have a voice. You are correct about that part. They
are not people yet. The potential to become a person does not give them
human rights. While they are still called a fetus they do not have the
ability to survive on their own.


Jeff, the total idiot, confuses "legal" rights with "natural" rights. Why
the hell didn't his mother abort him so we would not have to abide his
murderous nonsense.

3. I said that social issues and societal impact are important. It does
not mean that you can make the credulous cause and effect logical leaps
that you made.


The social impacts need to be considered BEFORE conception, not AFTER
conception. Jeff has got everything ass backwards as usual.

Keep in mind that the wealthy will always have access to abortion. The
only thing that you are debating is whether or not those who aren't
wealthy should have access to it.


That is not the debate at all as much as you would like it to be. The debate
is how many unborn children are going to be murdered to make life more
convenient for criminal slobs like you.

Many (most?) reputable scientists do not agree with the "abortion equals
murder" assertion. Just because you use inflammatory rhetoric does not
make your position correct.


Any person who has eyes in his head can see what abortion is all about -
science or no science. But liberals like Jeff do not want anyone to even
look at the pictures of abortions. The hypocrisy is monumental on their
part.

I charge abortionists with murder and those who support and approve of it
are also murderers. The day is not far off when what has been happening for
the past several decades will be seen for what it is and it will be reversed
with a vengeance. Liberals like Jeff will be thought monsters for thinking
the way they did. Others will forgive them their trespasses, but I, Saint
Edward the Great, will not. Some things cannot be forgiven - ever!

Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota




Ads
  #132  
Old August 2nd 05, 04:24 AM
HHS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Grippe" wrote in message
...

"HHS" wrote in message
...


Life could be taxing for these children. So it would be better if we
kill them now. They would eventually die anyway after a "quite
unpleasant" life. Have I got that right?

Of course the fetuses don't have a voice or a say in this matter. My
question was hypothetical. Your answer is they can't respond to
questions so they don't get to have a choice. We knew that already.


Read my response to Ed Dolan for more details but briefly

1. A fetus is not a child. It can not live at all without a host. It is
not a human life. Abortion of a fetus is a medical procedure and not
"killing".



Like "harvesting" baby seals as you would most likely put it wouldn't you
Jeff?


Wrong on every count. With an idiot like Jeff, it is all semantics. That
must be a Jewish thing. Were the Jews "murdered" in the concentration
camps or were they just "liquidated."


Of course no Jews were murdered in concentration camps. Just ask any Nazi.
There was however a procedure called the Final Solution that was
administered to them by their hosts at the camps. The overseers said it was
a procedure and not killing.



  #133  
Old August 2nd 05, 11:17 AM
Jeff Grippe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Abortion

HHS and Dolan: Lets get some thing straight.

1. You feel that abortion is that taking of an already existing human life.
You feel it is the moral equivilant of murder. I am certain that if I felt
the way you do I would feel the same amount of outrage that you do. So we
can begin with a point of agreement, specifically that murder is morally
wrong and we both are outraged by it. There are no social issues or impact
that justify murder.

Don't accuse me of things I didn't say. Because I point out the social
issues does not mean that I would condone abortion if I believed it was
murder. I wouldn't.

Just so that we have a two way point of agreement, lets also agree that if
it could somehow be demonstrated to your satisfaction that abortion was not
infact the taking of human life then it wouldn't be repugnant to you. I'm
not saying that I or anyone else can do this and I promise not to even try.
I'm just saying that we have a point of agreement at the idea that murder is
wrong.

The key difference in our opinion is not that I condone murder and you
don't. It is that I don't believe abortion is murder and you do. If you are
going to attempt to change my opinion or the opinion of people who think
like I do then it would probably be best not to lump us together with
practitioners of genocide or clubbers of baby seals, etc.


2. Given how you feel, you should continue to advocate for your position and
attempt to get the laws of this country changed. That is what I would do if
I felt the way you do.

But you must also admit that as obvious as you feel your position is, it is
not the only position on the issue. At this point it is not the majority
position although the opinion is pretty evenly divided. I wouldn't say that
either side has a clear mandate of public opinion. Don't bother to show me
your statitics and surveys because I can find ones done by people who feel
the way I do that are the mirror image.


3. Social Issues.

It is all well and good to say that people should abstain from sex to
prevent pregnancy. The problem is that they don't. You can advocate it all
you want but it is never going to be an effective birth control method. Not
because it wouldn't work but because you won't get enough people to practice
it.

It is also important to recognize that abortion will always be available to
the wealthy. It always has been. Weather you like it or not you are really
trying to legislate its availability to those who couldn't afford it
otherwise. You can't completely divorce class from the issue.


Note to Ed:

I know you don't like this style of posting. You've made that clear. If all
you are capable of is insulting me becuase you don't like my posting style
then you don't get to discuss an issue of great importance to you. Do you
really care about my posting style at a level equal to how you feel about
abortion? I would think that the abortion issue trumps here.



  #134  
Old August 2nd 05, 04:27 PM
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Grippe" jeff@door7 wrote in message
...
Abortion


Just Abortion? When I have waxed eloquent and imparted immortal words of
wisdom to all and sundry? Have you no shame?

HHS and Dolan: Lets get some thing straight.

1. You feel that abortion is that taking of an already existing human
life. You feel it is the moral equivilant of murder. I am certain that if
I felt the way you do I would feel the same amount of outrage that you do.
So we can begin with a point of agreement, specifically that murder is
morally wrong and we both are outraged by it. There are no social issues
or impact that justify murder.

Don't accuse me of things I didn't say. Because I point out the social
issues does not mean that I would condone abortion if I believed it was
murder. I wouldn't.


The social issues, whatever they are, are not worth considering when
confronted with the reality of taking innocent human lives.

Just so that we have a two way point of agreement, lets also agree that if
it could somehow be demonstrated to your satisfaction that abortion was
not infact the taking of human life then it wouldn't be repugnant to you.
I'm not saying that I or anyone else can do this and I promise not to even
try. I'm just saying that we have a point of agreement at the idea that
murder is wrong.

The key difference in our opinion is not that I condone murder and you
don't. It is that I don't believe abortion is murder and you do. If you
are going to attempt to change my opinion or the opinion of people who
think like I do then it would probably be best not to lump us together
with practitioners of genocide or clubbers of baby seals, etc.


You cannot persuade anyone that abortion is not the taking of innocent human
life (murder). Abortion has been with us for a long time now and it is a
more divisive issue that it has ever been. Abortion is not just another
subject to be discussed rationally. It is like the subject of slavery just
prior to the Civil War. You have chosen your side and I have chose my side.
I would be willing to have another civil war over this issue because I
believe it goes to the heart of what a humane and good society is all about.

Like all liberals, you have blinders on and you do not use words the way
they should be used. You are into euphemisms and nonsense talk. There is no
disagreement about what an unborn child is and what it is that you do to
that unborn child when you abort it. You do it because you value the
convenience of individuals more than you do any God given right to life. The
religionists are right on this issue and the liberal secularists are a
horror and an abomination. You are only a step away from the likes of Hitler
and Stalin and other mass murderers.

2. Given how you feel, you should continue to advocate for your position
and attempt to get the laws of this country changed. That is what I would
do if I felt the way you do.

But you must also admit that as obvious as you feel your position is, it
is not the only position on the issue. At this point it is not the
majority position although the opinion is pretty evenly divided. I
wouldn't say that either side has a clear mandate of public opinion. Don't
bother to show me your statitics and surveys because I can find ones done
by people who feel the way I do that are the mirror image.


We do not need liberal judges to tell us what to think about an issue such
as abortion. The damn liberal judges are making the laws, not our elected
representatives. That is going to change shortly thanks to President Bush
and no thanks to a moral cretin like former President Clinton.

Public opinion has been subject to liberal media bias on this issue from the
beginning. Opinions can be easily change from pro to con if and when the
facts are presented truthfully, something the liberal media is incapable of
doing.

3. Social Issues.

It is all well and good to say that people should abstain from sex to
prevent pregnancy. The problem is that they don't. You can advocate it all
you want but it is never going to be an effective birth control method.
Not because it wouldn't work but because you won't get enough people to
practice it.

It is also important to recognize that abortion will always be available
to the wealthy. It always has been. Weather you like it or not you are
really trying to legislate its availability to those who couldn't afford
it otherwise. You can't completely divorce class from the issue.


Who cares if a few rich people want to abort (kill) their own children for
the sake of their convenience. I do not want all of society imitating such
swinish behavior. Until fairly recently, the moral middle classes have
always had a superior morality to the immoral wealthy. I would like to keep
it that way. The very rich and the very poor have always behaved like swine.
What else is new? We need to only concern ourselves with the middle classes,
which is about 90% of all of society.

Note to Ed:

I know you don't like this style of posting. You've made that clear. If
all you are capable of is insulting me becuase you don't like my posting
style then you don't get to discuss an issue of great importance to you.
Do you really care about my posting style at a level equal to how you feel
about abortion? I would think that the abortion issue trumps here.


Nothing trumps posting style! It is the one and only thing that counts in
the grand scheme of things. You ought to be thrown up against a wall and
executed forthwith. Top posters are deserving of the lowest levels of Hell.
Read your Dante if you would like to know where you are destined to go for
your posting transgressions.

Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota




  #135  
Old August 2nd 05, 05:02 PM
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Grippe" jeff@door7 wrote in message
...
Abortion

[...]
It is all well and good to say that people should abstain from sex to
prevent pregnancy. The problem is that they don't. You can advocate it all
you want but it is never going to be an effective birth control method.
Not because it wouldn't work but because you won't get enough people to
practice it.


People should behave like human beings and not like swine. If all else
fails, they can follow my example. I am a Great Saint because I have
recognized from my teenage years that the one and only purpose of sex was to
create new life. Anyone engaged in it for any other purpose is a Great
Sinner and will surely never go to Heaven.

I even look down on my fellow Saints like Saint Augustine because he was a
Great Sinner before he became a Saint. But please note well that he is only
a Saint and not a Great Saint like me. In order to be a Great Saint, you
need to have never sinned, at least not in the sexual sphere.

However, I do not compare myself to Jesus Christ or the Virgin Mary. They
are into forgiveness and I never forgive anyone anything. I have a long
memory and I carry grudges for all eternity. So even though I am a Great
Saint, I am not God. But I know how God thinks and I know He does no approve
of secular liberal Jews like Jeff Grippe who thinks abortion is just fine
and dandy and a neat way to get rid of unwanted children.

But what do secular liberal Jews know of anything? All they know is their
confounded liberal ideology which leads them down every false path that
mankind has ever known. They end up friends and neighbors to the likes of
Hitler and Stalin.

All leftists are as loony as they come. Here is the progression: liberal -
socialist - communist - mass murderer. If Jeff Grippe is not careful, he
will end up like Michael Moore, a treasonous white pig who has no brain.

Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota



  #136  
Old August 2nd 05, 05:46 PM
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"HHS" wrote in message
news

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Grippe" wrote in message
...

"HHS" wrote in message
...


Life could be taxing for these children. So it would be better if we
kill them now. They would eventually die anyway after a "quite
unpleasant" life. Have I got that right?

Of course the fetuses don't have a voice or a say in this matter. My
question was hypothetical. Your answer is they can't respond to
questions so they don't get to have a choice. We knew that already.


Read my response to Ed Dolan for more details but briefly

1. A fetus is not a child.


Jeez! Maybe the lady is going to have a frog instead of a human child?

It can not live at all without a host.

Not relevant! This is what is known as deep liberal thought.

It is
not a human life.


It is most likely going to be a frog life!

Abortion of a fetus is a medical procedure and not
"killing".


Be sure not to ever let any anyone see any pictures of what is taking place.
If they do they will clearly see that the medical procedure is a killing.
Even abortion doctors do not like to discuss what it is that they do in
order too kill an unborn child. I wonder why that is?

Like "harvesting" baby seals as you would most likely put it wouldn't you
Jeff?


Wrong on every count. With an idiot like Jeff, it is all semantics. That
must be a Jewish thing. Were the Jews "murdered" in the concentration
camps or were they just "liquidated."


Of course no Jews were murdered in concentration camps. Just ask any
Nazi. There was however a procedure called the Final Solution that was
administered to them by their hosts at the camps. The overseers said it
was a procedure and not killing.


Extremely well said HHS!

Would those who think abortion is an excellent way to get rid of unwanted
children tell me what pro-choice means. That is the greatest weasel word I
have ever come across in connection with the issue of abortion. You are
either FOR abortion or you are AGAINST it. What does "pro-choice" have to do
with it? Jeff is pro-abortion, I am anti- abortion.

Leave it to cowardly liberals to fudge the terminology when they do not want
to face up to what words mean.

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here it is. The smoking gun. Bill C Racing 1 May 14th 05 03:44 AM
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 Mike Iglesias General 4 October 29th 04 07:11 AM
Parkinson's Survivor Trike Stolen Cycle America/Nat. Bicycle Greenway General 0 December 9th 03 07:10 AM
Stolen Logo Trike J. Parky Wetherell Recumbent Biking 2 December 8th 03 07:46 PM
which tandem recumbent trike should i buy Peter M Spirito Recumbent Biking 8 September 15th 03 09:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.