In aus.bicycle on 28 Mar 2007 16:07:30 -0700
Brendo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:57 am, "Bleve" wrote:
If the reporting is accurate, it seems the hellride is culpable.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...761567956.html

IF... Man crossed when lights indicated he could, and where indicated
he could, and cyclists rode through lights when red, then what other
conclusion can be drawn?


He didn't say conclusion, he said reporting. If those are indeed the
facts, then someone was culpable. If they aren't...

Zebee
- who isn't sure "the hellride" can be culpable unless it has
incorporation papers. As there are a rather large number of people
in that pack who didn't hit the guy. There is definitely a man who is
culpable, and possible some (the ones who were calling roll) who
contributed.