|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Square-Tapered Cranks
Is there any mechanical advantage (better stress loading) on a square
aligned square-tapered crankset or a diamond aligned square-tapered crankset? Assuming most people really do apply the bulk of the force on the down stroke. I'm quite curious about this. alan. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Square-Tapered Cranks
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Square-Tapered Cranks
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:51:48 -0500, Alex Rodriguez wrote:
In article .com, says... Is there any mechanical advantage (better stress loading) on a square aligned square-tapered crankset or a diamond aligned square-tapered crankset? Assuming most people really do apply the bulk of the force on the down stroke. No difference. Unless you use one of each and then you can have a Harley crank on your chopper bike. Ron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 165mm triple cranks, square taper | Mike | Marketplace | 0 | September 17th 05 05:18 PM |
Best Freestyle/Trials Unicycle? | excaliber906 | Unicycling | 4 | May 5th 05 02:47 AM |
Enlarging square taper cranks | Charles Smith | Techniques | 13 | May 2nd 05 10:17 PM |
Track Cranks (ad) | John Dacey | Marketplace | 0 | March 26th 05 06:38 AM |
Stockpiling 110mm/74mm chainrings and cranks | Rocketman | General | 15 | November 13th 03 07:32 PM |