![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:46:50 -0500, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 12/8/2014 7:19 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:48:15 -0500, dgk wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:08:42 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: I use hand signals only when I'm turning, just as the operator of a motor vehicle does (or should). SMH Don't they have "turn lights" in America :-? Apparently only the most expensive cars have turn signals, and those people are too important to use them. Truly? In the small 3rd world country I reside in use of "turn lights" is nearly universal even when only changing lanes on the highway. Really, the use of turn signals is amazingly uncommon in the U.S. (I was going to write "in Ohio," but it occurs to me it's been the same everywhere.) It's most frustrating to me when leaving our little neighborhood, trying to turn out onto the busy five lane road. I'll be waiting for one last car coming from the left to pass by, so I can scoot out into a brief clear space. And the car will slow, and slow further; then turn into the street I'm trying to exit. Some drivers seem to flick the turn signal on at the same time they begin cranking the wheel to the right. Many others will never signal at all. We had friends from Ireland visit us a few years back. The lack of turn signals caused some astonishment in our friends. "They don't use their indicators!" On the plus side, it's not that uncommon for cops to use this as justification for stopping a known bad guy. Newspaper reports sometimes say "XXXX was cited for an improper turn, possession of narcotics, possession of drug paraphernalia..." If these guys were smart enough to drive really carefully, they'd last longer on the streets. But as one of my cop friends told me, "They're not Einsteins, Frank." I would have to say that turn indicators are nearly universally used here, by both private and commercial vehicles. In fact, it would be very, very rare to see a large truck even change lanes without using his turn lights. Re criminals, I once had a conversation with a Maine State Policeman and had a remark like, "some of these guys seem kinda slow", referring to some of the state prisoners. He replied, "that's why they are in here". I assumed that he meant that anyone that was half smart didn't get caught. -- Cheers, John B. |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:19:34 +0700, John B. Slocomb
wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:48:15 -0500, dgk wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:08:42 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: I use hand signals only when I'm turning, just as the operator of a motor vehicle does (or should). SMH Don't they have "turn lights" in America :-? Apparently only the most expensive cars have turn signals, and those people are too important to use them. Truly? In the small 3rd world country I reside in use of "turn lights" is nearly universal even when only changing lanes on the highway. Sorry, I was referring to the US, New York City in particular. I'd say 40% of drivers signal their turn early enough for me to find it useful. I don't trust their signals, but I do factor them into how I react to them. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2014 2:33 PM, dgk wrote:
Sorry, I was referring to the US, New York City in particular. I'd say 40% of drivers signal their turn early enough for me to find it useful. I agree with that estimate. I don't trust their signals, but I do factor them into how I react to them. Ditto. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:33:50 -0500, dgk wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:19:34 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:48:15 -0500, dgk wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:08:42 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: I use hand signals only when I'm turning, just as the operator of a motor vehicle does (or should). SMH Don't they have "turn lights" in America :-? Apparently only the most expensive cars have turn signals, and those people are too important to use them. Truly? In the small 3rd world country I reside in use of "turn lights" is nearly universal even when only changing lanes on the highway. Sorry, I was referring to the US, New York City in particular. I'd say 40% of drivers signal their turn early enough for me to find it useful. I don't trust their signals, but I do factor them into how I react to them. I'm surprised, really. I remember way back when I was in High School they started a "Driver's Training" course. The school even had a car with dual controls. I had assumed that by now USians all had formal driver's training and were aware of all the do's and don't -- Cheers, John B. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:15:23 +0700, John B. Slocomb
wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:33:50 -0500, dgk wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:19:34 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:48:15 -0500, dgk wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:08:42 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: I use hand signals only when I'm turning, just as the operator of a motor vehicle does (or should). SMH Don't they have "turn lights" in America :-? Apparently only the most expensive cars have turn signals, and those people are too important to use them. Truly? In the small 3rd world country I reside in use of "turn lights" is nearly universal even when only changing lanes on the highway. Sorry, I was referring to the US, New York City in particular. I'd say 40% of drivers signal their turn early enough for me to find it useful. I don't trust their signals, but I do factor them into how I react to them. I'm surprised, really. I remember way back when I was in High School they started a "Driver's Training" course. The school even had a car with dual controls. I had assumed that by now USians all had formal driver's training and were aware of all the do's and don't They may have been trained to use them but they don't find it necessary in real life. Probably because they never get ticketed for that. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:21:20 -0500, dgk wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:15:23 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:33:50 -0500, dgk wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:19:34 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:48:15 -0500, dgk wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:08:42 +0700, John B. Slocomb wrote: I use hand signals only when I'm turning, just as the operator of a motor vehicle does (or should). SMH Don't they have "turn lights" in America :-? Apparently only the most expensive cars have turn signals, and those people are too important to use them. Truly? In the small 3rd world country I reside in use of "turn lights" is nearly universal even when only changing lanes on the highway. Sorry, I was referring to the US, New York City in particular. I'd say 40% of drivers signal their turn early enough for me to find it useful. I don't trust their signals, but I do factor them into how I react to them. I'm surprised, really. I remember way back when I was in High School they started a "Driver's Training" course. The school even had a car with dual controls. I had assumed that by now USians all had formal driver's training and were aware of all the do's and don't They may have been trained to use them but they don't find it necessary in real life. Probably because they never get ticketed for that. You need to implement the "free enterprise" system that we have here. You do something wrong; the cop stops you; you pay him the fine and go your way; or you do something wrong; you surrender your drivers license and must report to the Police Officer's home office in 3 days time to pay the fine and have your license returned. Of course, if you pay on the spot the fine goes into the "Police Benevolence" fund and is used to improve the life of the police officers, which provides a certain amount of enthusiasm, in the Police ranks, for law enforcement. -- Cheers, John B. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There's a thread on alt.usage.english with the subject line: "is this the silliest term of art ever?" I've been tempted to mention "controlling the lane". You can't control anything but your own body parts, and not always those, but if you ask nicely, people nearly always give you what you need. Or what they *think* you need; clear communication is the key to safe riding. -- joy beeson at comcast dot net http://joybeeson.home.comcast.net/ The above message is a Usenet post. I don't recall having given anyone permission to use it on a Web site. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/14/2014 7:25 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:
There's a thread on alt.usage.english with the subject line: "is this the silliest term of art ever?" I've been tempted to mention "controlling the lane". You can't control anything but your own body parts, and not always those, but if you ask nicely, people nearly always give you what you need. Or what they *think* you need; clear communication is the key to safe riding. Well said. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/11/2014 8:14 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
You need to implement the "free enterprise" system that we have here. You do something wrong; the cop stops you; you pay him the fine and go your way; or you do something wrong; you surrender your drivers license and must report to the Police Officer's home office in 3 days time to pay the fine and have your license returned. Of course, if you pay on the spot the fine goes into the "Police Benevolence" fund and is used to improve the life of the police officers, which provides a certain amount of enthusiasm, in the Police ranks, for law enforcement. So, the free market philosophy applied to policing! I think that would be approved by roughly half the American public. Until the first time they were pulled over, that is. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/14/2014 7:25 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:
There's a thread on alt.usage.english with the subject line: "is this the silliest term of art ever?" I've been tempted to mention "controlling the lane". You can't control anything but your own body parts, and not always those, but if you ask nicely, people nearly always give you what you need. Or what they *think* you need; clear communication is the key to safe riding. Well, when I ride in the middle of a narrow lane, it seems to adequately communicate that there's insufficient room to pass unless the passers leave the lane. Call it what you will; it works. And for the situation I usually ask about - an 8.5 foot truck coming up behind me in a 10 foot lane - I don't know a better alternative. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speeding cyclist mows down elderly jogger | Mrcheerful | UK | 10 | February 13th 14 10:43 PM |
Cyclist:0 Disabled granny:1 | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 1 | June 13th 13 09:15 PM |
Hit & run cyclist injures elderly woman on pavement | John Benn | UK | 25 | August 19th 12 09:33 AM |
cyclist says injured granny should not be on pavement! | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 5 | June 13th 10 07:37 PM |
Cyclist hits granny in pavement crash in Brighton | [email protected] | UK | 167 | February 1st 09 10:44 AM |