|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:22*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 23, 12:21*pm, Shraga wrote: Mountain bikers are coward, because they are unwilling to tell the truth. You are both deliberately lying. Nothing useful can be done with scum like that, except use you as examples of the typical mountain biker. "Mountain bikers are coward...?" Silly man. You're the one unwilling to tell the truth in this thread. I've asked you twice, and you keep trying to change the subject, which is typical behavior for a liar. Why are you afraid of the truth, coward? I was specific about your lie, yet you vaguely accuse me of lying with ZERO evidence. As I wrote before, this is typical of your naive approach to science. In the past, I asked you to tell your side of the "handsaw" story, and you ran and hid at that request too. You're really good at badgering people to respond to you, but you really suck at responding in kind. Guess that's your problem, though. You're the one who has to explain why his mugshot is on the Internet: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealer...52810-37NC.htm Charge dismissed. What else do you need to know? You're barking up a nonexistent tree. My mugshot is there because two mountain bikers LIED about me, as I already explained. But mountain bikers don't hear, when they don't agree with what they are hearing. Nothing new there! Oh come on. You were GUILTY on two counts of exhibiting a deadly weapon and one count of battery. Are you telling me those were dismissed too, or are you hiding that fact (i.e., lying)? Every time I answer you, you change the subject! You asked me about a "handsaw". Charge dismissed! How many times do I have to say it, before you hear it, idiot? Repeat after me: "Charge dismissed!" Obviously, I can't discuss something that didn't happen.... Sheesh. No, stupid. I asked you to "tell your side of the 'handsaw' story" (i.e., your account of the events). You've never answered that, I've answered it several times, LIAR: charge dismissed. I.e., it didn't happen. I.e., the mountain biker LIED, just as you are doing. I guess you aren'a happy with the truth. Nothing new there! apparently because you can't read. If you would like me to call it something with fewer syl-la-bles, feel free to make a suggestion. Furthermore, I'm being very consistent in my request. You're the one dodging, for some reason. Stop blaming me for your inability to read. You can't (won't) read. You claim the mountain bikers "lied" but, just as you're doing with me, you don't say what they lied about. Given your history of baseless accusation, you're going to have to do better than vague unsubstantiated accusations. They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Dismissed or innocent. Get it yet, stupid? This is the whole point of my question, although by now I've given up on a coherent response, because you're either too scared to respond, or you're simply a compulsive liar. I have never lied. I don't need to, because I'm right. So obviousy, I hear just fine. You seem to be the one struggling to understand my posts. You claim here, "charge dismissed," and the mountain bikers lied, but you were still guilty on three charges. When I ask you to clarify this discrepancy, you evade the question by projecting behaviors onto me. All I'm asking for is your account of the events that led to the charges against you to set the story straight, nothing more. In other words, I am asking to hear the TRUTH. Yet you are afraid to tell the truth for some reason. BS. This is the first time you asked that. No it isn't, liar: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...rm/thread/9207... Still, your evading the question AGAIN is duly noted, coward. Since all the charges were based on LIES, there is no point in discussing them. Sorry to disappoint you, but you aren't going to make any points. What gave you the silly idea I'm going for "points?" I'm just asking for information, which you fail to grasp, somehow, stupid. No, you aren't, because you aren't satisfied after I answer you. I did not brandish (except in self-defense, which is not a crime), nor did I commit battery -- the mountain biker did, by running into me. All you want to do is LIE ("you were still guilty"), so there's no point in trying to have a rational conversation with you. Just like ALL mountain bikers, all you want to do is twist the facts, since they don't support your bizarre ideas. Three of the six charges were neither dismissed nor acquitted. What facts am I twisting? Most of them. The mountain bikers lied. That's all you need to know. Only an idiot like you would mistake a line of questioning for a lie. I tried asking you a question; you refuse to answer it. I explain my understanding of the details (which may be wrong), hoping you will illuminate the facts; you continue to evade the question, and call me a liar. Because you ARE a liar: I already answered the question, several times, AS YOU WELL KNOW. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. You have yet to demonstrate ANY "dishonesty", except your own. FACT: You don't accept the truth, because you don't like it. It doesn't favor your pro-mountain-biker view. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:22*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 23, 12:21*pm, Shraga wrote: Mountain bikers are coward, because they are unwilling to tell the truth. You are both deliberately lying. Nothing useful can be done with scum like that, except use you as examples of the typical mountain biker. "Mountain bikers are coward...?" Silly man. You're the one unwilling to tell the truth in this thread. I've asked you twice, and you keep trying to change the subject, which is typical behavior for a liar. Why are you afraid of the truth, coward? I was specific about your lie, yet you vaguely accuse me of lying with ZERO evidence. As I wrote before, this is typical of your naive approach to science. In the past, I asked you to tell your side of the "handsaw" story, and you ran and hid at that request too. You're really good at badgering people to respond to you, but you really suck at responding in kind. Guess that's your problem, though. You're the one who has to explain why his mugshot is on the Internet: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealer...52810-37NC.htm Charge dismissed. What else do you need to know? You're barking up a nonexistent tree. My mugshot is there because two mountain bikers LIED about me, as I already explained. But mountain bikers don't hear, when they don't agree with what they are hearing. Nothing new there! Oh come on. You were GUILTY on two counts of exhibiting a deadly weapon and one count of battery. Are you telling me those were dismissed too, or are you hiding that fact (i.e., lying)? Every time I answer you, you change the subject! You asked me about a "handsaw". Charge dismissed! How many times do I have to say it, before you hear it, idiot? Repeat after me: "Charge dismissed!" Obviously, I can't discuss something that didn't happen.... Sheesh. No, stupid. I asked you to "tell your side of the 'handsaw' story" (i.e., your account of the events). You've never answered that, apparently because you can't read. If you would like me to call it something with fewer syl-la-bles, feel free to make a suggestion. Furthermore, I'm being very consistent in my request. You're the one dodging, for some reason. Stop blaming me for your inability to read. You claim the mountain bikers "lied" but, just as you're doing with me, you don't say what they lied about. Given your history of baseless accusation, you're going to have to do better than vague unsubstantiated accusations. They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Get it yet, stupid? This is the whole point of my question, although by now I've given up on a coherent response, because you're either too scared to respond, or you're simply a compulsive liar. So obviousy, I hear just fine. You seem to be the one struggling to understand my posts. You claim here, "charge dismissed," and the mountain bikers lied, but you were still guilty on three charges. When I ask you to clarify this discrepancy, you evade the question by projecting behaviors onto me. All I'm asking for is your account of the events that led to the charges against you to set the story straight, nothing more. In other words, I am asking to hear the TRUTH. Yet you are afraid to tell the truth for some reason. BS. This is the first time you asked that. No it isn't, liar: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...rm/thread/9207... Still, your evading the question AGAIN is duly noted, coward. Since all the charges were based on LIES, there is no point in discussing them. Sorry to disappoint you, but you aren't going to make any points. What gave you the silly idea I'm going for "points?" I'm just asking for information, which you fail to grasp, somehow, stupid. I did not brandish (except in self-defense, which is not a crime), nor did I commit battery -- the mountain biker did, by running into me. All you want to do is LIE ("you were still guilty"), so there's no point in trying to have a rational conversation with you. Just like ALL mountain bikers, all you want to do is twist the facts, since they don't support your bizarre ideas. Three of the six charges were neither dismissed nor acquitted. What facts am I twisting? Only an idiot like you would mistake a line of questioning for a lie. I tried asking you a question; you refuse to answer it. I explain my understanding of the details (which may be wrong), hoping you will illuminate the facts; you continue to evade the question, and call me a liar. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. Your FIRST lie, of course, is never using your real name. That's the first sign of a LIAR. You can't even tell the truth about your own name! Sheesh. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:22*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 23, 12:21*pm, Shraga wrote: Mountain bikers are coward, because they are unwilling to tell the truth. You are both deliberately lying. Nothing useful can be done with scum like that, except use you as examples of the typical mountain biker. "Mountain bikers are coward...?" Silly man. You're the one unwilling to tell the truth in this thread. I've asked you twice, and you keep trying to change the subject, which is typical behavior for a liar. Why are you afraid of the truth, coward? I was specific about your lie, yet you vaguely accuse me of lying with ZERO evidence. As I wrote before, this is typical of your naive approach to science. In the past, I asked you to tell your side of the "handsaw" story, and you ran and hid at that request too. You're really good at badgering people to respond to you, but you really suck at responding in kind. Guess that's your problem, though. You're the one who has to explain why his mugshot is on the Internet: http://police.berkeley.edu/crimealer...52810-37NC.htm Charge dismissed. What else do you need to know? You're barking up a nonexistent tree. My mugshot is there because two mountain bikers LIED about me, as I already explained. But mountain bikers don't hear, when they don't agree with what they are hearing. Nothing new there! Oh come on. You were GUILTY on two counts of exhibiting a deadly weapon and one count of battery. Are you telling me those were dismissed too, or are you hiding that fact (i.e., lying)? Every time I answer you, you change the subject! You asked me about a "handsaw". Charge dismissed! How many times do I have to say it, before you hear it, idiot? Repeat after me: "Charge dismissed!" Obviously, I can't discuss something that didn't happen.... Sheesh. No, stupid. I asked you to "tell your side of the 'handsaw' story" (i.e., your account of the events). You've never answered that, apparently because you can't read. If you would like me to call it something with fewer syl-la-bles, feel free to make a suggestion. Furthermore, I'm being very consistent in my request. You're the one dodging, for some reason. Stop blaming me for your inability to read. You claim the mountain bikers "lied" but, just as you're doing with me, you don't say what they lied about. Given your history of baseless accusation, you're going to have to do better than vague unsubstantiated accusations. They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. Where, liar? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 4:33*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: Your FIRST lie, of course, is never using your real name. That's the first sign of a LIAR. You can't even tell the truth about your own name! Sheesh. Now you're just getting desperate. Did I upset you that much? Also: you just lied AGAIN, liar. Twice. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 28, 7:43*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Dismissed or innocent. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. You have yet to demonstrate ANY "dishonesty", except your own. FACT: You don't accept the truth, because you don't like it. It doesn't favor your pro-mountain-biker view. Bitch, please. Go look up the word "everything" in a dictionary, moron, and then consider the definition in the context of the sentence, "They lied about EVERYTHING." When you're done, look up "fact," because you are confusing it with the word, "assumption" or "bias." Dishonesty demonstrated. That was too easy. Unless you want to provide your version of the events that led to the charges being filed against you, along with a narrative that includes your perspective of the trial, you can just save your ramblings and lies for someone else. Now, I'm off to the magazine stands to purchase the published version of your trial, which stands alone in its detail of the events. Lies or not, since you refuse to tell your side of the story, it's all anyone has if they are interested in reading an article about it. Enjoy your infamy. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 9:14*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 29, 4:33*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: Your FIRST lie, of course, is never using your real name. That's the first sign of a LIAR. You can't even tell the truth about your own name! Sheesh. Now you're just getting desperate. Did I upset you that much? Also: you just lied AGAIN, liar. Twice. Where is the lie? You are afraid to use your real name, just as I said. You just lied AGAIN. So what IS your real name? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 9:51*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 28, 7:43*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Dismissed or innocent. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. You have yet to demonstrate ANY "dishonesty", except your own. FACT: You don't accept the truth, because you don't like it. It doesn't favor your pro-mountain-biker view. Bitch, please. Go look up the word "everything" in a dictionary, moron, and then consider the definition in the context of the sentence, "They lied about EVERYTHING." When you're done, look up "fact," because you are confusing it with the word, "assumption" or "bias." Dishonesty demonstrated. That was too easy. Unless you want to provide your version of the events that led to the charges being filed against you, along with a narrative that includes your perspective of the trial, you can just save your ramblings and lies for someone else. Now, I'm off to the magazine stands to purchase the published version of your trial, which stands alone in its detail of the events. BS. It is mostly lies, as you well know. "Bike" Magazine & Peter Frick- Wright are not where an intelligent person would go to get the truth about mountain biking, since they are profiting from it. That's obvious to everyone but mountain bikers. Why don't you pay for the trial transcript? Then you can hear the police & mountain bikers lying. Lies or not, since you refuse to tell your side of the story, I already did. How many times do I have to do it, before you hear it?: "charge dismissed". End of story. Did you get it yet? If not, ask your mommie to explain it to you. it's all anyone has if they are interested in reading an article about it. Enjoy your infamy. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 9:51*am, Shraga wrote:
On Nov 28, 7:43*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Dismissed or innocent. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. You have yet to demonstrate ANY "dishonesty", except your own. FACT: You don't accept the truth, because you don't like it. It doesn't favor your pro-mountain-biker view. Bitch, please. Go look up the word "everything" in a dictionary, moron, and then consider the definition in the context of the sentence, "They lied about EVERYTHING." When you're done, look up "fact," because you are confusing it with the word, "assumption" or "bias." Dishonesty demonstrated. That was too easy. Unless you want to provide your version of the events that led to the charges being filed against you, along with a narrative that includes your perspective of the trial, you can just save your ramblings and lies for someone else. Now, I'm off to the magazine stands to purchase the published version of your trial, which stands alone in its detail of the events. Lies or not, since you refuse to tell your side of the story, it's all anyone has if they are interested in reading an article about it. Enjoy your infamy. Only in the minds (such as they are) of mountain bikers. Everyone else knows I'm telling the truth. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 3:10*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Nov 29, 9:51*am, Shraga wrote: On Nov 28, 7:43*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: They lied about EVERYTHING. That's why three of the charges were dismissed or acquitted. Really? So you weren't there? They weren't there? If they lied about "EVERYTHING," then they must have lied about being there. They must have lied about you having a handsaw, yet below you admit to having one. So now you are OBVIOUSLY lying. There is NO WAY they lied about "EVERYTHING." You wrote yourself, "three of the charges..." What about the other three? Dismissed or innocent. You continue to use projection as a means to dodge the question. Again, you claim to respect the truth, yet you refuse to provide it here as a means of refuting the charges against you. Moreover, you LIE with generalities as a excuse to answer the question. Your dishonesty in this forum is repulsive. You have yet to demonstrate ANY "dishonesty", except your own. FACT: You don't accept the truth, because you don't like it. It doesn't favor your pro-mountain-biker view. Bitch, please. Go look up the word "everything" in a dictionary, moron, and then consider the definition in the context of the sentence, "They lied about EVERYTHING." When you're done, look up "fact," because you are confusing it with the word, "assumption" or "bias." Dishonesty demonstrated. That was too easy. Unless you want to provide your version of the events that led to the charges being filed against you, along with a narrative that includes your perspective of the trial, you can just save your ramblings and lies for someone else. Now, I'm off to the magazine stands to purchase the published version of your trial, which stands alone in its detail of the events. BS. It is mostly lies, as you well know. "Bike" Magazine & Peter Frick- Wright are not where an intelligent person would go to get the truth about mountain biking, since they are profiting from it. That's obvious to everyone but mountain bikers. Why don't you pay for the trial transcript? Then you can hear the police & mountain bikers lying. A transcript is written or printed, you wouldn't hear anything but paper flapping idiot, DUH!! |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Biker Runs Red Light, Kills Pedestrian
On Nov 29, 3:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Nov 29, 9:14*am, Shraga wrote: On Nov 29, 4:33*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Nov 27, 11:38*am, Shraga wrote: Your FIRST lie, of course, is never using your real name. That's the first sign of a LIAR. You can't even tell the truth about your own name! Sheesh. Now you're just getting desperate. Did I upset you that much? Also: you just lied AGAIN, liar. Twice. Where is the lie? You are afraid to use your real name, just as I said. You just lied AGAIN. So what IS your real name? Are you going to call his employer like you have on others? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Biker Runs Brake Lever Through His Hand | Mike Vandeman[_4_] | Mountain Biking | 0 | April 17th 10 05:49 PM |
Hit & Run Mountain Biker Kills Pedestrian! | Mike Vandeman[_4_] | Mountain Biking | 6 | October 31st 09 05:01 PM |
Hit & Run Mountain Biker Kills Pedestrian! | Mike Vandeman[_4_] | Social Issues | 6 | October 31st 09 05:01 PM |
Mountain Biker Runs Over Intelligent Alien | Milke Vamdenam | Mountain Biking | 0 | December 31st 05 05:48 AM |