![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alright, my bike currently has a 70mm head tube angle with 63 mm travel on
the fork. I mentioned in another thread that I was thinking about getting a new fork like this one: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2BC12E05 or another 80mm travel fork (any suggestions for a nice price--marzocchi maybe). Anyway, someone mentioned that most people find 71 degrees to be about right for the head tube angle. Of course, mine is already off that mark by 1 degree. Does anyone know how much the above fork would throw off the angle even more? Is there any way at all to counteract that effect without having a frame builder replace the head tube. If not, then does anyone have any other suggestions? Thanks again, Alan McClure |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alan McClure" wrote:
Alright, my bike currently has a 70mm head tube angle with 63 mm travel on the fork. I mentioned in another thread that I was thinking about getting a new fork like this one: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2BC12E05 or another 80mm travel fork (any suggestions for a nice price--marzocchi maybe). Anyway, someone mentioned that most people find 71 degrees to be about right for the head tube angle. Of course, mine is already off that mark by 1 degree. Does anyone know how much the above fork would throw off the angle even more? Is there any way at all to counteract that effect without having a frame builder replace the head tube. If not, then does anyone have any other suggestions? The change from a 63 to 80mm shock (assuming the ride height will change by ~15mm once sag is factored in) will be between close to another degree (probably about 0.7-8 degrees, depending on a lot of minor things like wheelbase). That would put your head tube's effective angle at 69 degrees - pretty slack, but not horribly so. I doubt you'll find the difference all that drastic though. If it's a stiffer, better fork the result will be worth it. Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alan McClure" wrote:
"Mark Hickey" wrote The change from a 63 to 80mm shock (assuming the ride height will change by ~15mm once sag is factored in) will be between close to another degree (probably about 0.7-8 degrees, depending on a lot of minor things like wheelbase). That would put your head tube's effective angle at 69 degrees - pretty slack, but not horribly so. I doubt you'll find the difference all that drastic though. If it's a stiffer, better fork the result will be worth it. I think maybe I accidentally sent you an e-mail rather than replying to the group. So, here is what I wrote: Do you think there is any other reasonable option--including replacing the headtube at a frame machine shop? Would that cost an unreasonable amount of money? I am assuming that it would, but I don't really know. It seems like there would have to be some way around the loss of another degree, but maybe not. You did send me an email... here is/was my reply... Probably not worth it unless you have an emotional attachment to that frame that makes it worth spending much more than it's worth to upgrade it. I'd recommend trying the shock and see if you like the results. If that doesn't work out, there are plenty of frames out there that you could buy with appropriate angles (and that are probably lighter and stronger to boot). Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan McClure said...
Alright, my bike currently has a 70mm head tube angle with 63 mm travel on the fork. I mentioned in another thread that I was thinking about getting a new fork like this one: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2BC12E05 or another 80mm travel fork (any suggestions for a nice price--marzocchi maybe). Anyway, someone mentioned that most people find 71 degrees to be about right for the head tube angle. Of course, mine is already off that mark by 1 degree. Does anyone know how much the above fork would throw off the angle even more? Is there any way at all to counteract that effect without having a frame builder replace the head tube. If not, then does anyone have any other suggestions? Thanks again, Alan McClure I just went from 80mm travel to 125mm travel when I installed my Fox Vanilla fork and I love the geometry change. One reason I bought the Fox was that it converts between 80, 100, and 125mm travel. I figured that I would have to knock it down to 80 to get good handling, but now I see no reason to bother with it. When I was having problems with my stock 80mm fork, I talked with the guy who designed the bike and he said that they run them at 105mm all the time and they feel great. This conversation came up when I arranged to trade up my defective 80mm fork for a Duke SL U-Turn which has a travel range of 63-105mm. My experience agrees with his. I do have the sag set to the maximum recommended, and I may find out that there may be times when less travel would be better, like on challenging uphills, but there are advantages and disadvantages to everything. It's all a matter of taste, and the differences can be subtle. I don't think you should lose any sleep over the difference between a 63 and 80mm fork. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
First time bike builder: play between the fork and frame, what to do? | Peter Cole | General | 6 | July 18th 04 04:52 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Threaded versus threadless headset | Hjalmar Duklęt | General | 64 | August 29th 03 06:55 PM |
Fork question for Specialized expedition sport | Alan McClure | Mountain Biking | 4 | June 26th 03 12:25 PM |