![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This will cheer you up...
First read this from the Bike Biz site... Is this man fit for his job? Think carefully before buying a child a bike for Christmas, is the message from Calderdale's road safety officer, reports the Huddersfield Daily Examiner. RSO Peter Shepherdson blames the child cyclist victims involved in RTAs. Peter Shepherdson, Calderdale's road safety officer, said: "Pre-teenagers, bicycles and roads are a cocktail for disaster. We warn young children away from knives and fire, yet we give them bikes knowing that in most cases they will be ridden on the road without supervision or any regard for the Highway Code." Shepherdson told Huddersfield Daily Examiner that in the last five years 74 Calderdale children had been hit by vehicles, nine seriously. The newspaper reported that Shepherdson said "it was impossible to think of anything else which was given to children which had such an unenviable safety record." The great majority of road safety officers in other areas will be shocked by Shepherdson's victim-blaming stance but it's a sad fact that a small minority of RSOs would love to see less cycling on their patch because the easiest method to reduce cyclist injury statistics is to reduce the numbers of people who cycle. Britain suffers from an epidemic of 'Health & Safety' measures yet the step that would have the greatest impact on injury reduction for all vulnerable road users - the taming of cars - is a measure beyond the ken of some RSOs. OK, now read this press release from Calderdale MBC... 4 November 2005 Killer Bikes Every Christmas it seems that there are stories of dangerous and defective toys, but can there be any bigger killer and crippler of children than the humble bicycle? http://www.calderdale.gov.uk/council...8844&ref=index You may, if you wish, contact the Calderdale transportation team on Or the newspaper .... Huddersfield Examiner Switchboard - 01484 430000 Fax - 01484 437789 Email (Newsroom) (Reader letters) Address - Huddersfield Daily Examiner, PO Box A26, Queen Street South, Huddersfield, HD1 2TD |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
P.s Google seems to have done something weird with the e-mail
addresses. They should read transportationteam (at) calderdale.gov.uk editorial (at) examiner.co.uk (Newsroom) letters (at) examiner.co.uk (Readers Letters) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... tale of numptyism That's SingletrackWorld's area isn't it? cheers, clive |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hot on the heels of my comments about bigotry...
Having taken the trouble to read the newspaper article, I see that the most inflammatory language is not cited as quotations of Mr. Sheprdson's views (amazingly, the reporter seems to have embellished the story). What Sheperdson does say is: 1. There is an age below which children should not be allowed onto the road without adult supervision. Anyone here who would let a 4 year old ride a bike on the road unsupervised? No? In that case all that is left is: 2. Mr. Sheperdson thinks the age at which children become competent (at least with training) is around 10. I can see that some here might claim that the age is earlier, but this is intensely subjective and obviously highly dependent on the individual child. As to "blaming the victim", not every child involved in a collision with a motor vehicle is innocent of blame. And even if they were, this is like stepping onto a zebra crossing half a second before a large lorry will pass over it at 30mph - you may have right of way, but you'll still be squashed. Advising parents to make political statements on your behalf by sending their children out as cannon-fodder is peculiarly callous. -- Peter Headland |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the reporter seems to have embellished the story
My bad - "reporter" should read "PR flack". -- Peter Headland |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has someone got angy and taken a hammer to their website? It seems broken.
http://www.calderdale.gov.uk/council...8844&ref=index |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... P.s Google seems to have done something weird with the e-mail addresses. ... P.P.S. - Google Groups modifies any e-mail addresses within a post, in order to help avoidance of the so-called "Spambots" (automatic harvesters of e-mail addresses, later sold for use with unsolicited commercial e-mail). If you are unfortunate enough to be reading messages via Google Groups, you can still retrieve the modified addresses by clicking on the partially displayed "link" in the message. Follow the instructions from there. If you are reading this Usenet discussion group with a "proper" newsreader (not a web browser), then the e-mail addresses display correctly without the faff. -- MatSav |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Headland wrote: As to "blaming the victim", not every child involved in a collision with a motor vehicle is innocent of blame. And even if they were, this is like stepping onto a zebra crossing half a second before a large lorry will pass over it at 30mph - you may have right of way, but you'll still be squashed. Advising parents to make political statements on your behalf by sending their children out as cannon-fodder is peculiarly callous. First, I should point out that the above material was taken directly from the BikeBiz site. However, you do seem to have missed the point of the concern felt by Carlton over at BikeBiz and come to it myself. No one is suggesting that parents 'make political statements...by sending their children out as cannon fodder.' The point is that the whole press release makes absolutely no reference to the need for drivers to take especial care when there are child cyclists about. Instead it implies that any parent who lets a child out on the roads alone is almost willingly sending them to their deaths with no one but the child and its parent is to blame if this does happen. The piece comes across as being a classic piece of victim blaming strongly implying that when a child is killed or injured on the road it must be assumed that this is entirely the child's 'fault'. ('Too often parents say, 'Go and play on your bike.' not thinking that their child will race out onto the road and could be killed or seriously injured.' 'We warn young children away from knives and fire, yet we give them bikes knowing that in most cases they will be ridden on the road without supervision or any regard for the Highway Code.' ). How about telling drivers of the need to make allowances for the limited riding and risk evaluation skills of young children? It also parrots the orthodoxy that 'cycling safety' = wear a polystyrene hat and a high-viz jacket when we all know that the only truly effective way to improve road safety is to modify driver behaviour and to hold motorists to be more responsible for their actions. The article also implies that as children are killed when cycling it must cycling which is 'dangerous' ('killer bikes) rather than highlighting the fact that the actual danger to children is posed by cars. By the same reasoning Calderdale MBC should be giving out warnings about 'killer walking' after all many children are hit by cars whilst walking. All in whole the article is wholly car-centric and sensational ('can there be any bigger killer and crippler of children than the humble bicycle') and calculated to deter anyone from letting their child cycle at all. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
P.s This story has had an update over on the BikeBiz site
http://www.bikebiz.co.uk UPDATE: TSO's shock comments were "official" When the Calderdale road safety officer blamed child cyclists for being hit by vehicles, BikeBiz.com thought Peter Shepherdson may have been selectively misquoted by his local newspaper. It turns out the story was based on an official press release entitled "Killer bikes"... "Every Christmas it seems that there are stories of dangerous and defective toys, but can there be any bigger killer and crippler of children than the humble bicycle?" asks the release. Er, yes. Motor cars hitting them. The release starts badly and gets worse as it goes on. According to Calderdale metropoltican borough council, when children put bicycles on their Christmas wish lists, this creates a "terrible burden of responsibility for their parents". RSO Peter Shepherdson plays the scare card: "Too often parents say, 'Go and play on your bike.' not thinking that their child will race out onto the road and could be killed or seriously injured. It can and does happen all too frequently here in Calderdale." Incredibly, the stand-out quotes from the newspaper story, carried on BikeBiz.com earlier in the day, are from the official press release: In the last five years 74 Calderdale children have been hit by other vehicles and injured, thankfully none fatally, but 9 seriously. Many more bumps and scrapes go unreported. It is impossible to think of anything else we give our children which has this unenviable safety record. Council Road Safety Officer, Peter Shepherdson is emphatic 'Pre teenagers, bicycles and roads are a cocktail for disaster.' He added, 'We warn young children away from knives and fire, yet we give them bikes knowing that in most cases they will be ridden on the road without supervision or any regard for the Highway Code. The rest of the release contains some basic, common sense advice but that will be lost on those parents who may now be convinced that bicycles are death-traps, a message that local bicycle retailers are incensed about. http://www.calderdale.gov.uk/council...8844&ref=index |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autofaq now on faster server | Simon Brooke | UK | 216 | April 1st 05 10:09 AM |
Design News article about bikes | [email protected] | Techniques | 8 | January 14th 05 01:07 PM |
Danny-boy flails some more! (was: Advice on a good hardtail.) | Jonesy | Mountain Biking | 31 | June 18th 04 08:01 PM |
"Road" bikes | Chris Zacho The Wheelman | Techniques | 8 | April 5th 04 10:37 PM |
Mutant Road Bikes | Dave Mayer | Techniques | 52 | March 11th 04 06:45 AM |