![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 04:51:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:27:18 -0500, "EdwardDolan" wrote: Alvin D. wrote: In short, you [hikers] are enjoying a luxurious, government financed and constructed area and like a little kid in the sand box trying to hug all the toys in your arms so no one else can play with them. Anyone who is willing to walk can enjoy whatever the government has provided in the way of wilderness and for free too! Of course you can. So why the outcry about others enjoying the "forest primeval" as you term it? They can enjoy it by walking since that way there is no interference with anyone else also enjoying the environment. Elementary, my Dear Watson! After all, it is not "primeval" at all as you twits insist on having paths made, some with stairs even, "oh my goodness, we must have walked a whole mile today Estrella", and you dainty creatures don't want to exert yourselves. Fireplaces, the three walled Appalachian shelters, those cute marker posts so that the intrepid "trekkers" won't lose their way. What is next? Fumigations crews to kill all those savage insects?\/ Ohoooo a deer fly might bite me! Ohooo I'm so scared. It is primeval enough by the standards of today. Anyone who is walking in a wilderness setting is roughing it no matter how many conveniences he is carrying. In any event, such a walker is in no way impacting the wilderness except in the most minor ways. I'd listen to you except that I am old enough to actually have "worked in the woods" as they used to term it, and have also worked in truly primeval areas in other countries where there no signs that man had ever existed there. When you use the term "primeval" you simply don't know what you are talking about. You use the word to describe the Appalachian Trail, for instance, but the Appalachian Trail is damned close to civilization when you compare it with an actual primeval area, which, quite obviously, you know nothing about. But of course you are not actually talking about a primeval area you are simply parroting the word in an effect to make your notions sound logical and important. What an Asshole you are! Everything you've applied to hikers can be applied to bikers in spades, in fact to just about anyone. Your remarks are as pointless as you are. Either make a relevant point or get lost! Of course. When one talks with a fool one must use foolish language else how will he understand you. But, as I mentioned previously the valid point is that you are attempting to hug government built and maintained areas intended for the entire population to your skinny little chest in order to prevent others from using them In short a small and insignificant individual trying to clasp all the toys in the toy box to his pathetic little chest and shouting, "They are Mine! All Mine! You can't play with them!" Has the U.S. actually sunk so low that a greedy little fellow like you is now its spokesman? Pathetic. -- Alvin D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I love Mountain Biking, it is a good way to see the wilderness, theuninhabited wilderness... | [email protected] | Mountain Biking | 6 | May 22nd 10 10:30 PM |
Mountain Bikers Hate Wilderness! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 2 | September 4th 08 01:21 AM |
Mountain Bikers Hate Wilderness! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 2 | September 4th 08 01:21 AM |