An unlikely Boris bike casualty.

Always a risk when you have to rely on badly designed motor vehicles in your
otherwise excellent scheme.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...kes-trailer.do

--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

On 05/11/2010 12:38, Simon Mason wrote:
Always a risk when you have to rely on badly designed motor vehicles in your
otherwise excellent scheme.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...kes-trailer.do

Why rely on them at all?

Just leave the bikes wherever they happen to be when their users have no
further use for them. Sorted.

Simon Mason wrote:
Always a risk when you have to rely on badly designed motor vehicles
in your otherwise excellent scheme.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...kes-trailer.do

Oh that is funny!

So, Simple Simon. Whats the alternative to "badly designed motor vehicles"
then.

This is going to be good.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:38:49 -0000, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

Always a risk when you have to rely on badly designed motor vehicles in your
otherwise excellent scheme.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...kes-trailer.do



Thanks for posting that.

Do you think that cycling is becoming more dangerous?


--
Stopping distances for bicycles do not appear in the HC ... and so
cannot be of any consequence.
(Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20 mph limits - and thinks it's clever)