![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque to break the front forks. So that company only recommends rear-wheel hub motors. 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than a 4% grade. 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade. 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35 to 40 pounds. WHAT ??????????? 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of your charge. 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up between the pedals, and drive the chain. 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph. In real life, they get about half their rated milage per charge. 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60 pounds. 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to rotate in the proper direction. These operations can void your kit warranty. 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years, so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it. Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. johns |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 28, 5:58*pm, johns wrote:
Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque * * to break the front forks. So that company only * * recommends rear-wheel hub motors. 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power * * rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than * * a 4% grade. 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can * * generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade. 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35 * * to 40 pounds. WHAT ??????????? 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a * * battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill * * for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of * * your charge. 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a * * very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up * * between the pedals, and drive the chain. 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph. * * In real life, they get about half their rated milage per * * charge. 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60 * * pounds. 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your * * bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration * * of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to * * rotate in the proper direction. These operations can * * void your kit warranty. 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years, * * *so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it. Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. johns No wonder I've never seen one. Joseph |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
johns wrote:
Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. ........ Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. johns One thing I noticed right off when I started looking into gas and electric bicycle engine kits, was that the people with electrics always, always ended up wishing they could ride longer. During a short test ride the torque/acceleration can seem impressive, and you usually cannot explore the limitations of the battery endurance. With gas engines you can ride all day if you keep pouring gas in. Most of the gas ones don't do real well up hills either, because they only allow one drive speed. The Staton/NuVinci setup seems to be the first that allows variable drive ratios. A few people have built bikes using the cheap Lifan moped/motorcycle engines, 50-to-100cc engines that only cost around $300 and come with a 3- or 4-speed transmission. These are usually over legal displacement/power/top speed limits but the multiple gears totally eliminates the problem of hillclimbing. And the engine/trans weighs around 40 lbs. ~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I rode motorcycles for 20+ years as my only
transportation ... and lived through it :-) I could ride for days and just camp on the road, and I never got tired of it. Only reason I stopped was BMW started producing crap bikes, and I sure wasn't going back to all that repair and downtime with any other brand. BMW put garbage brakes on all their new bikes, and I have a rule about unsafe motorcycles. Only in the last year have I even thought about it. There's a small lightweight touring bike in Europe that looks just like my old Penton 125cc Enduro. I had the 6-day bike, and I rode it for a hundred miles in the dirt in races. It would make a good modern road bike. Mine got about 65 mpg, and it could have been tuned down to get more. Only weighed 200 pounds. So, what I'm saying ... if I go back to a motorcycle, it will be a real bike with good handling. I'm seeing ebikes that I think cross the line to emotorcycles ... and are not safe at all. johns |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
johns wrote:
Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. Similar thing to what I keep telling people when they ponder the idea of hub motors for assistance. If you take the typical weight of a hub motor, batteries, and control assembly, and lose that weight from around your now massive arse, you would more than make up for it, and it cost a whole lot less than the asking price. And I want to dispute the saving of $20K over three years. Against what? A car? You can't compare apples and oranges you know. Want to compare against another bike? Sure, take that $14K price tag, donate it, buy Enron shares, burn it, whatever, and you'll save more than that 60 pounds in bike weight in body weight loss, and improvment in health over the next few years, AND save that in healthcare costs. Hub motors have their place, but not for those who have functional legs, heck, even ONE functional leg is enough (seen a fellow commuter amputee who did it without a damn motor). -- Linux Registered User # 302622 http://counter.li.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:58:31 -0700 (PDT), johns
wrote: Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque to break the front forks. So that company only recommends rear-wheel hub motors. 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than a 4% grade. 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade. 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35 to 40 pounds. WHAT ??????????? 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of your charge. 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up between the pedals, and drive the chain. 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph. In real life, they get about half their rated milage per charge. 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60 pounds. 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to rotate in the proper direction. These operations can void your kit warranty. 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years, so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it. Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. johns Well, I'll respond to a few of these points. 1- If the hub motor can produce enough torque to break the fork,, either the fork is so weal it is already unsafe, and/or Number 2 has to be wrong. 2_ If this is the case, the fork must be extremely weak and unsafe, even without the motor. 3- Even a low powered gear motor may not be able to pull an 8% grade. And just because it is a hub motor does NOT mean it is not a gear motor. There are planetary geared hub motors out there. 4- Look at a Currie 450 watt gear motor. Can't weigh much more than 5 lbs. Then again, a mobility scooter motor can weigh anywhere from 5 to 40 lbs (for an aproxemately 350 watt motor) I have motors at both ends of the scale. 5- I'd agree. Regenerative braking is oversold. It is ONLY viable with a direct drive hub motor. Any other setup gives away too much efficiency by having to back-drive it whenever running without power on. 6- Yes, hub motors are unsprung weight. So are geared motors mounted at the wheel like the Currie. And so are ANY motor mouinted to a non-suspension bicycle. Yes, mounting them close to the bottom bracket and driving through the chain (allowing use of the gears) IS the most efficient - and requires a free-wheel crankset. 7- Rated mileage on mine says "with normal pedaling" These are ELECTRIC ASSIST BICYCLES, not electric motorcycles. I have no doubt I can get the rated mileage if I use the motor only as an ASSIST. I was going to find out today by attempting a 35 KM jaunt (mile is rated, IIRC, at 20 miles maximum range) but I ended up having to cancel because I needed to take the truck and cxover a LOT more distance in less time. 8- Yup. 9- Machining on the bike voids the kit warranty? You need to adjust something on the motor to make it work, which voids the warranty? Sounds like a rather halfassed kit with no support - likely an "import it yourself" chinese box of junk. 10- You paid HOW MUCH for it???? The marketing hype has pushed a LOT of E-Bike prices into the stratosphere. I just bought a pretty decent fully equipped e-bike for just over $600, all taxes in. It has fenders at both ends, a rear carrier, stand, lights, mirror, bell, reflectors - everything I need. It IS heavy and has a "limited" range - as advertized - but 8 tanks of gas for my van will pay for the bike at TODAY'S prices. That should be doable just going back and forth to the office for one summer. I'm adding a 26ah battery pack on the rack to supplement the 12ah pack for longer trips - and possibly going to 36 volts instead of 24 for a bit more power. I'll still have under a thousand dollars tied up in it, even buying the heavier charger required for the "premium" batteries. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:21:32 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote: On May 28, 5:58Â*pm, johns wrote: Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque Â* Â* to break the front forks. So that company only Â* Â* recommends rear-wheel hub motors. 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power Â* Â* rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than Â* Â* a 4% grade. 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can Â* Â* generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade. 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35 Â* Â* to 40 pounds. WHAT ??????????? 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a Â* Â* battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill Â* Â* for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of Â* Â* your charge. 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a Â* Â* very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up Â* Â* between the pedals, and drive the chain. 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph. Â* Â* In real life, they get about half their rated milage per Â* Â* charge. 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60 Â* Â* pounds. 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your Â* Â* bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration Â* Â* of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to Â* Â* rotate in the proper direction. These operations can Â* Â* void your kit warranty. 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years, Â* Â* Â*so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it. Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. johns No wonder I've never seen one. Joseph I've got one factory built unit and am building a "homebrew". It will have 7 speeds and front wheel drive, with 18 or 21 speeds on the rear "pedal power unit" The geared motor I am using IS a bit heavy - and the front fork is VERY beefy. NO suspension. The ebike is here. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:35:47 -0700 (PDT), johns
wrote: I rode motorcycles for 20+ years as my only transportation ... and lived through it :-) I could ride for days and just camp on the road, and I never got tired of it. Only reason I stopped was BMW started producing crap bikes, and I sure wasn't going back to all that repair and downtime with any other brand. BMW put garbage brakes on all their new bikes, and I have a rule about unsafe motorcycles. Only in the last year have I even thought about it. There's a small lightweight touring bike in Europe that looks just like my old Penton 125cc Enduro. I had the 6-day bike, and I rode it for a hundred miles in the dirt in races. It would make a good modern road bike. Mine got about 65 mpg, and it could have been tuned down to get more. Only weighed 200 pounds. So, what I'm saying ... if I go back to a motorcycle, it will be a real bike with good handling. I'm seeing ebikes that I think cross the line to emotorcycles ... and are not safe at all. johns A lot of the socalled "e-bikes" I am seeing in Ontario are poorly disguised electric motor scooters - which you would NEVER pedal in normal use, and definitely no more than a block. I sure like my Schwinn/Currie I-Zip from Canadian Tire. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 May 2008 09:54:38 +1000, John Tserkezis
wrote: johns wrote: Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. Similar thing to what I keep telling people when they ponder the idea of hub motors for assistance. If you take the typical weight of a hub motor, batteries, and control assembly, and lose that weight from around your now massive arse, you would more than make up for it, and it cost a whole lot less than the asking price. And I want to dispute the saving of $20K over three years. Against what? A car? You can't compare apples and oranges you know. Want to compare against another bike? Sure, take that $14K price tag, donate it, buy Enron shares, burn it, whatever, and you'll save more than that 60 pounds in bike weight in body weight loss, and improvment in health over the next few years, AND save that in healthcare costs. Hub motors have their place, but not for those who have functional legs, heck, even ONE functional leg is enough (seen a fellow commuter amputee who did it without a damn motor). Some of us "old guys" don't have the legs or the lungs to do the distance we need to go without assistance - and particularly not without getting all sweated up on the way to the office. With my e-bike, I pedal, but not strenuously, for about 18 minutes to get to the office instead of driving the van for 8 minutes. I get the exercise I would not get driving, and arrive at work in better shape than I ever would with my normal bicycle - which has not beed ridden much over the last several yearsdue to a bad knee, among other things. To do the trip with my old 21 speed bike would take me half an hour and I'd arrive sweaty and worn out. There are several pretty good hills on the route (the main highway is much leveler, but no bikes, mopeds, e-bikes, pedestrians, etc allowed) As a kid of about 15, I lost a pedal on a SINGLE SPEED bike 30 miles from home, and rode it back, up hill and down. I'm not that young any more!!!! ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 28, 1:03 pm, DougC wrote:
johns wrote: Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to get .. Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go. One thing I noticed right off when I started looking into gas and electric bicycle engine kits, was that the people with electrics always, always ended up wishing they could ride longer. During a short test ride the torque/acceleration can seem impressive, and you usually cannot explore the limitations of the battery endurance. With gas engines you can ride all day if you keep pouring gas in. Most of the gas ones don't do real well up hills either, because they only allow one drive speed. The Staton/NuVinci setup seems to be the first that allows variable drive ratios. A few people have built bikes using the cheap Lifan moped/motorcycle engines, 50-to-100cc engines that only cost around $300 and come with a 3- or 4-speed transmission. These are usually over legal displacement/power/top speed limits but the multiple gears totally eliminates the problem of hillclimbing. And the engine/trans weighs around 40 lbs. It seems like at that point, you're getting into "just buy a moped" territory. I used to live in a hilly area and knew some people who got E-bikes or Curries to commute up the hill to work (elevation gain 800 ft, a real hill). They work for that - only need a fairly short ride time, twice a day, power gets you up the hill, but not at car speed. I preferred riding a much lighter plain old people-bike, but not everyone wants to get that much exercise. However, people who want the ebike to cruise at high speeds or have a really long range are basically asking it to be an imitation moped, scooter, or motorcycle. I doubt that one can make a decent faux moped without making it as heavy as a moped, and then it would probably be better and safer to actually get a moped. The same goes triple for motorcycles. Electric scooters could be an interesting, and quieter, niche. My pet peeve: people who ride loud gas-powered "bicycles" on bike paths. Get on the road. Ben |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Re.Lots of cycles lots of lids | Steve Watkin | UK | 198 | May 4th 07 08:46 AM |
Lots of cyclists, lots of lids | Pyromancer | UK | 23 | April 28th 07 12:54 AM |
vid ideas.... | chosen | Unicycling | 19 | September 1st 06 04:34 AM |
ideas | brockfisher05 | Unicycling | 8 | January 21st 05 10:08 PM |
Ideas please | dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers | UK | 11 | April 11th 04 11:35 PM |