|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Architects and Engineers are trained to create buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high- rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 presented us with a body evidence (i.e. controlled demolition) that was largely outside the scope of our training and experience. In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore find ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside experts and, quite willingly, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires. After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses". There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 experts as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST. It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office wrote:
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural engineers and architects. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
"False Facts" wrote in a message
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Because they are architects and engineers. By looking at history, they can hope to avoid any mistakes made. From the minute those towers collapsed, they have been studying and discussing the 'why' of it. Of course, your hope is to imply something entirely different. As usual, you fail miserably. There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years... Parroting 5 year old conspiracy theories that were debunked 5 years ago is *not* the same as a 'growing body of solid evidence'. The only growing body seems to be the tumor growing where your brain once existed. It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see... That the 'will' readily see? So, you are *hoping* they look at it? Wasn't it the purpose of your question a pathetic attempt to make others believe architects and engineers already *have* bought into your lunacy? What's the matter - feeling alone in your padded cell? : that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office wrote:
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses? Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural engineers and architects. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colnago marketing needs to run this stuff by their engineers ... | bdbafh | Techniques | 7 | February 11th 07 03:01 PM |
Engineers | SteveA | Australia | 45 | June 27th 05 04:23 AM |
Basso collapses ! | Keith | Racing | 46 | May 24th 05 06:29 PM |
Traffic engineers: braindead? | Rich | UK | 35 | May 22nd 05 09:55 AM |
Mechanical engineers in bike industry | Mike V | Techniques | 77 | December 8th 04 12:43 PM |