A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » Australia
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 25th 07, 06:19 PM posted to alt.conspiracy,us.politics,nz.politics,aus.bicycle
War Office
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


Architects and Engineers are trained to create buildings that function
well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-
rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11
presented us with a body evidence (i.e. controlled demolition) that
was largely outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated
attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to
rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore find ourselves
relying solely upon the judgment of outside experts and, quite
willingly, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that
the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and
resulting fires. After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the
building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".

There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these
"collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining
ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave
doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 experts as well as the official
reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will
readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both
classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the
evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We
hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review
each section thoroughly.

Ads
  #2  
Old May 25th 07, 09:18 PM posted to alt.conspiracy,us.politics,nz.politics,aus.bicycle
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office wrote:
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural
engineers and architects.

  #3  
Old May 26th 07, 04:56 AM posted to alt.conspiracy,us.politics,nz.politics,aus.bicycle
John P.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

"False Facts" wrote in a message

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


Because they are architects and engineers. By looking at history, they can
hope to avoid any mistakes made. From the minute those towers collapsed,
they have been studying and discussing the 'why' of it.

Of course, your hope is to imply something entirely different. As usual, you
fail miserably.


There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these
"collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years...


Parroting 5 year old conspiracy theories that were debunked 5 years ago is
*not* the same as a 'growing body of solid evidence'. The only growing body
seems to be the tumor growing where your brain once existed.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will
readily see...


That the 'will' readily see? So, you are *hoping* they look at it? Wasn't it
the purpose of your question a pathetic attempt to make others believe
architects and engineers already *have* bought into your lunacy?

What's the matter - feeling alone in your padded cell?


: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both
classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the
evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We
hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review
each section thoroughly.



  #4  
Old June 1st 07, 02:44 AM posted to alt.conspiracy,us.politics,nz.politics,aus.bicycle
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office wrote:
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural
engineers and architects.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Colnago marketing needs to run this stuff by their engineers ... bdbafh Techniques 7 February 11th 07 03:01 PM
Engineers SteveA Australia 45 June 27th 05 04:23 AM
Basso collapses ! Keith Racing 46 May 24th 05 06:29 PM
Traffic engineers: braindead? Rich UK 35 May 22nd 05 09:55 AM
Mechanical engineers in bike industry Mike V Techniques 77 December 8th 04 12:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.