A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why don't you pussies



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th 04, 05:52 PM
Rik Van Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why don't you pussies

pool your money together and put your own ad on Velonews that says you
don't believe tyler, or better yet.. Tyler and Oj both innocent.

RVD

Ads
  #2  
Old November 15th 04, 06:06 PM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guess what Carnot Engine,

Cary Ellis's science is a lot better than the Kangaroos who said their
test is 100% infallible.

DNA tests took years to be accepted because they needed to be reassured
all the false positives were worked out. Innocent people went to jail
over false positives for DNA tests.

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a court
of law.

So don't confuse bad juries with bad science. And that ain't even how
you spell OJ.

Fag,

Magilla




Rik Van Diesel wrote:

pool your money together and put your own ad on Velonews that says you
don't believe tyler, or better yet.. Tyler and Oj both innocent.

RVD

  #3  
Old November 15th 04, 06:06 PM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guess what Carnot Engine,

Cary Ellis's science is a lot better than the Kangaroos who said their
test is 100% infallible.

DNA tests took years to be accepted because they needed to be reassured
all the false positives were worked out. Innocent people went to jail
over false positives for DNA tests.

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a court
of law.

So don't confuse bad juries with bad science. And that ain't even how
you spell OJ.

Fag,

Magilla




Rik Van Diesel wrote:

pool your money together and put your own ad on Velonews that says you
don't believe tyler, or better yet.. Tyler and Oj both innocent.

RVD

  #4  
Old November 15th 04, 07:41 PM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaGorilla wrote:

snip

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a

court
of law.





Dumbass -

They're not going to throw the blood doper in jail. It's only bike
racing.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

  #5  
Old November 15th 04, 07:41 PM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaGorilla wrote:

snip

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a

court
of law.





Dumbass -

They're not going to throw the blood doper in jail. It's only bike
racing.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

  #6  
Old November 15th 04, 09:31 PM
Rik Van Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaDOPER!!!Gorilla wrote:

Innocent people went to jail over false positives for DNA tests.
The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a

court
of law.


DOPER!

you spell OJ.


How about Juice, DOPER!

RVD

  #7  
Old November 15th 04, 09:31 PM
Rik Van Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaDOPER!!!Gorilla wrote:

Innocent people went to jail over false positives for DNA tests.
The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a

court
of law.


DOPER!

you spell OJ.


How about Juice, DOPER!

RVD

  #8  
Old November 16th 04, 01:16 AM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:

snip

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a


court

of law.






Dumbass -

They're not going to throw the blood doper in jail. It's only bike
racing.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.


Dumbass,

Ever hear of civil court?

Magilla
  #9  
Old November 16th 04, 01:16 AM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:

snip

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a


court

of law.






Dumbass -

They're not going to throw the blood doper in jail. It's only bike
racing.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.


Dumbass,

Ever hear of civil court?

Magilla
  #10  
Old November 16th 04, 05:28 AM
Philip W. Moore, Jr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lie detector tests aren't admissible in civil or criminal courts, and
statistically they are nearly 90% accurate. The reason why some science
isn't admissible even though it's almost always accurate is because certain
applications get blind faith when it isn't merited. This will be a part of
Tyler's argument, especially if he can't invalidate the science employed by
the UCI.

Tyler is going to file a lawsuit I guarantee it. The scientific methods
that ultimately are presented to the jury will be determined by a judge
after reviewing pre-trial motions to strike expert witness testimony.

I'm not so sure it's safe to assume that the UCI's methods will ultimately
be upheld by the arbitration panel. BTW, it will be a three judge panel,
one appointed by Tyler, one appointed by the UCI and the third appointed by
the consent of the first two (without input from the parties).
"MagillaGorilla" wrote in message
...
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:

snip

The homologous blood transfusion test would never be accepted by a


court

of law.






Dumbass -

They're not going to throw the blood doper in jail. It's only bike
racing.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.


Dumbass,

Ever hear of civil court?

Magilla



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.