|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 16th 04, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Bloomberg is lying?
http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html
This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, Magilla 
|
| Ads |
|
#3
November 16th 04, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , says...
http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex
|
|
#4
November 16th 04, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amen, Alex. As a resident of Chelsea, the problems would be huge if the
stadium was built there. The Jets only want Manhattan. Queens is out of the question. "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex
|
|
#5
November 16th 04, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amen, Alex. As a resident of Chelsea, the problems would be huge if the
stadium was built there. The Jets only want Manhattan. Queens is out of the question. "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex
|
|
#6
November 16th 04, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex Yeah, and Ratner can keep his stadium for the Nets in Atlantic Center too. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001
|
|
#7
November 16th 04, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex Yeah, and Ratner can keep his stadium for the Nets in Atlantic Center too. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001
|
|
#8
November 16th 04, 07:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex It's football, only half their games are at home, and only once a season will it be at home on a Monday night. A few other events, like Jimmy Buffet concerts, might bring a few more traffic hang-ups. But really, for the people that matter, the people that live and work in NY City, they are savvy enough to know that using a car for anything other than getting out of the city is useless and vain. They'll still complain like hell though about having a stadium on their island. Even though the proposal is cool as all hell.
|
|
#9
November 16th 04, 07:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
In article , says... http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7206.0.html This can't be correct - otherwise it would mean Mayor Bloomberg is lying to the public about the reasons to build that new stadium for the Jets by floating $800 million in bonds. New Yorkers will show you Boston Big Dig people how to steal some real money from the public. Velonews must not have gotten the memo from the Jets' PR front office to suppress these kind of articles. Help me out here, JT. Blue States Rule when it comes to corruption, IMHO the stadium would be a big mistake. Not a stadium, but the stadium they want to put up for the Jets. They are putting a stadium in a very densely populated area of NYC. They are basically going to screw up traffic any time there is an event there. They should put the stadium in a different part of the city which can handle the increased traffic. What they should be doing with the space is just extend the convention center, which is part of the stadium plan. That would be money well spent because it would bring more revenue to the city with basically no extra traffic. ------------------- Alex It's football, only half their games are at home, and only once a season will it be at home on a Monday night. A few other events, like Jimmy Buffet concerts, might bring a few more traffic hang-ups. But really, for the people that matter, the people that live and work in NY City, they are savvy enough to know that using a car for anything other than getting out of the city is useless and vain. They'll still complain like hell though about having a stadium on their island. Even though the proposal is cool as all hell.
|
|
#10
November 16th 04, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you're stupid enough to take a car down the west side highway..you should
sit in traffic..
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT - George Bush is lying to us again - bunkers were sealed | Ravenwolf | Racing | 45 | November 10th 04 02:45 AM |
Linear Mode
