A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Hour Record set in LA!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old November 26th 04, 08:48 PM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Tom Kunich wrote:

I'm confused. Apparently this was a national record since it wasn't

set to
UCI standards - meaning no geek bars. So what the hell good is it to

anyone?




Dumbass -

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.
K. Gringioni.

Ads
  #82  
Old November 27th 04, 03:33 AM
Tom Kunich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com...

Tom Kunich wrote:

I'm confused. Apparently this was a national record since it wasn't

set to
UCI standards - meaning no geek bars. So what the hell good is it to

anyone?

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.


Look Henry, you may give your own personal importance to anything you like.
It is understood that your basic interests are men, but nevertheless others
have things that they consider important as well.

Here's a clue - if you DON'T like the thread, stop reading it. You'll appear
less stupid than you are in that manner.


  #83  
Old November 27th 04, 03:33 AM
Tom Kunich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com...

Tom Kunich wrote:

I'm confused. Apparently this was a national record since it wasn't

set to
UCI standards - meaning no geek bars. So what the hell good is it to

anyone?

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.


Look Henry, you may give your own personal importance to anything you like.
It is understood that your basic interests are men, but nevertheless others
have things that they consider important as well.

Here's a clue - if you DON'T like the thread, stop reading it. You'll appear
less stupid than you are in that manner.


  #84  
Old November 27th 04, 03:41 AM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Tom Kunich wrote:


snip



Dumbass -

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.
thanks,



K. Gringioni.

  #85  
Old November 27th 04, 03:41 AM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Tom Kunich wrote:


snip



Dumbass -

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.
thanks,



K. Gringioni.

  #86  
Old November 27th 04, 08:06 PM
Tom Kunich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com...

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.
thanks,


And yet compared to Henry Chang, it is the most important thing on the
earth.


  #87  
Old November 27th 04, 08:06 PM
Tom Kunich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com...

A "Masters" 30-34 record is completely and utterly meaningless.
thanks,


And yet compared to Henry Chang, it is the most important thing on the
earth.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WOW! New women's hour record set Willowbeauty UK 4 October 5th 03 09:52 PM
Could Lance break the "athlete's hour" record? Boyd Speerschneider Racing 9 July 23rd 03 05:39 AM
Hour Record Attempt Dave Larrington Recumbent Biking 2 July 21st 03 09:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.