Tom is confused

Tom Arsenault wrote:

Other stupid stuff snipped...

BTW if you don't understand what I'm discussing as your message plainly
implies, just don't post anything rather than making yourself look even
dumber than the rest of us think you are.


HOLY ****! Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, meet pot.

We all know that the 2 of you are the acknowledged experts about
everything, even if you're not.

Tom

Some people actually are experts in things, you know. You and the other
Tom are not two of those people though.

Thanks,

Magilla

MagillaGorilla wrote in message ...
Tom Arsenault wrote:

Other stupid stuff snipped...

BTW if you don't understand what I'm discussing as your message plainly
implies, just don't post anything rather than making yourself look even
dumber than the rest of us think you are.


HOLY ****! Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, meet pot.

We all know that the 2 of you are the acknowledged experts about
everything, even if you're not.

Tom

Some people actually are experts in things, you know. You and the other
Tom are not two of those people though.

Thanks,

Magilla

I do actually know that people are experts in things. It just appears
that most of the time, neither yourself or Mr. Kunich are qualified
to speak about what you speak about. This is not to say that you
don't have a valid, or sometimes invalid viewpoint about things (same
for the other Tom), but it's just well known that Tom (the other one
and not me) is a know it all. I, on the other hand, can claim that
I've been wrong in many instances. This is just not one of them.

Tom

MagillaGorilla wrote in message ...
Tom Arsenault wrote:

Other stupid stuff snipped...

BTW if you don't understand what I'm discussing as your message plainly
implies, just don't post anything rather than making yourself look even
dumber than the rest of us think you are.


HOLY ****! Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, meet pot.

We all know that the 2 of you are the acknowledged experts about
everything, even if you're not.

Tom

Some people actually are experts in things, you know. You and the other
Tom are not two of those people though.

Thanks,

Magilla

I do actually know that people are experts in things. It just appears
that most of the time, neither yourself or Mr. Kunich are qualified
to speak about what you speak about. This is not to say that you
don't have a valid, or sometimes invalid viewpoint about things (same
for the other Tom), but it's just well known that Tom (the other one
and not me) is a know it all. I, on the other hand, can claim that
I've been wrong in many instances. This is just not one of them.

Tom

Tom Arsenault wrote:

snip

Some people actually are experts in things, you know. You and the other
Tom are not two of those people though.

Thanks,

Magilla


I do actually know that people are experts in things. It just appears
that most of the time, neither yourself or Mr. Kunich are qualified
to speak about what you speak about. This is not to say that you
don't have a valid, or sometimes invalid viewpoint about things (same
for the other Tom), but it's just well known that Tom (the other one
and not me) is a know it all. I, on the other hand, can claim that
I've been wrong in many instances. This is just not one of them.

Tom

Be specific when you claim I get something wrong. Don't just come in
here and post a generalized statement that makes some ambiguous
reference to the past. Show me the specific posts.

And I'll show you why you got your facts wrong.

Magilla

Tom Arsenault wrote:

snip

Some people actually are experts in things, you know. You and the other
Tom are not two of those people though.

Thanks,

Magilla


I do actually know that people are experts in things. It just appears
that most of the time, neither yourself or Mr. Kunich are qualified
to speak about what you speak about. This is not to say that you
don't have a valid, or sometimes invalid viewpoint about things (same
for the other Tom), but it's just well known that Tom (the other one
and not me) is a know it all. I, on the other hand, can claim that
I've been wrong in many instances. This is just not one of them.

Tom

Be specific when you claim I get something wrong. Don't just come in
here and post a generalized statement that makes some ambiguous
reference to the past. Show me the specific posts.

And I'll show you why you got your facts wrong.

Magilla