![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
- Bob - writes:
I've seen a few posts indicating that vintage (70's, early 80's) tandems are not a good idea. What are the issues ? Is it frame flex causing drive train issues? Other problems ? IMHO, one of the main problems with these tandems is insufficient braking power, especially on steep downhill runs. Here in San Diego we had a couple on a purpose-built jack taylor tandem lose both front and rear centerpull brakes on a very steep downhill. The vintage pads were dry-rotted and so popped out when asked to deliver unreasonable stopping power. This is not the type of failure you'd expect to see on a road bike. Most tandems today use cantilever or U-brakes at a minimum, and disc brakes (3-brake tandems) are also very very common. The things that tended to fail on road bikes, e.g. broken rear spokes, broken axles, indexed headsets, snapped chains, 2-pawl freewheels, etc., tended to fail much more frequently on vintage tandems because in those days road bike technology was insufficiently robust under the high stress loads of tandems. - Don Gillies San Diego, CA |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage tandems - why so evil ? | Mark | Techniques | 12 | July 10th 06 02:05 AM |
Vintage tandems - why so evil ? | [email protected] | Techniques | 0 | July 5th 06 03:12 AM |
Vintage tandems - why so evil ? | me | Techniques | 1 | July 5th 06 01:47 AM |
Vintage tandems - why so evil ? | peter | Techniques | 0 | July 4th 06 07:21 PM |
Tandems - sized differently ? | [email protected] | Techniques | 5 | March 8th 06 01:39 AM |