![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 4:59*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Aug 11, 7:46 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] It is an allusion to think that tyo can improve on what the doctor prescribes. Before you know it, you will be consulting with witch doctors and snake oil salesmen. It is an illusion to think that a doctor knows all that there is to know about everything. *One of my doctors has said that he has learned much from his patients. *The point being made was that information is there that you have not and are not wiling to avail yourself of available information. *Anything that you can earn that can be applied in a complimentary and holistic approach to healing is a good thing. You are embarked on wild goose chase which will do nothing to enhance your long term prospects. [...] Your opinion has been noted for what it is ... fallacious. I will let you in on a few things that if you weren't such a lazy ass, you'd be able to learn for yourself. It is now generally accepted that 30-90% of all cancer is diet related. There is a strong association of high intake of Omega-6 fats and the occurrence of prostate cancer and the degree of its aggressiveness. The fact is that nutrition plays a major role in the sensitivity and likelihood of developing cancer. The health of our DNA is nutrient dependent, as is our ability to repair DNA damage. Cancer begins with mutated faulty genes. Free radicals damage DNA, which when not repaired, is passed on through replication. A shortage of antioxidants inhibit the DNA repair process. Many cells have special cancer growth genes called protooncogenes which if turned on from the unrepaired DNA causes normal cells to be transformed into cancer cells that replicate uncontrollably. What wakes up (read turns on) these genes and precipitates cancer are viruses, chemicals, infections, radiation, foreign bodies, and nutritional deficiencies, especially deficiency of folate. Exposure to these causative factors result in the formation of free radicals and chronic inflammation leading to cancer. Once cancer cells are established they have an enormous appetite for sugar,, iron and glutamate. A seaweed extract foo additive commonly found in baked goods and ice cream, (CARRAGEENEN) promotes the aggressive growth and spread of cancer by stimulating the COX-2 enzyme. I could go on and on here, but it should be obvious that I know far more more about the biology of the disease than does Ed Dolan, not that that in any way hinders him from running his mouth and offering errant opinion stated as though fact. Even if what you say is true, what good does it do me now after a lifetime of eating dairy and red meat? Is the medical establishment now warning men not to eat dairy and red meat? If so, I haven't seen or heard it. In a word ... YES. *It is not what I say, but what medical researchers and doctors now say. *As I have said all along, you haven't heard because you haven't taken the time or made the effort required to hear the message. *It is never too late to take some corrective measures to improve one's health and well being. Nope, I haven't heard or seen anything advising men not to eat dairy or red meat. This would be headline news if it were true. In fact, it would be on a par with the campaign against tobacco. You haven't heard because you have chosen not to hear. The campaign against tobacco also was repressed and got off to a slow start after the evidence was in and the truth were known. Much of this has to do with deep pocket lobbying interest since a lot of money is at stake. Regardless, the information is there for those who care to educate themselves, but you are not among those that choose to be enlightened. No surprise there. Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 5:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...] This is all hocus-pocus nonsense. The FDA is the expert on food safety, not crackpot "scientific researchers". Says the crackpot know-it-all who expounds without hesitation about subjects for which his knowledge is he is woefully deficient. One distinct difference between Ed and myself is that I present what Ed abhors ... FACTS, whereas Ed is admittedly all about opinion ... namely, HIS. Not being in possession of the facts has never curtailed Ed from running his mouth even when it is obvious to most that Ed knows little or nothing of that about which he is speaking. Your facts are not really facts, they are just another set of opinions camouflaged as facts. Ed Dolan has publicly gone on record to state that our food is safe and the FDA ensures that it is. Ed's assertion is not supported by the facts. As is customarily the case, Ed has chosen to run his mouth without knowing what he's talking about. Ed, hasn't bothered to do the research before spewing errant opinions as though they were facts. Lets just take a cursory look at the safety of our food. No, let's not! It is a waste of time and effort. Only cranks concern themselves with food safety, unless you are being paid to do it like the FDA. [...] The bottom line is that patients have been callously abandoned to die, denied access to progress by their own FDA at a time when they needed it most, when their life was on the line. AND ... this is the very same FDA that Ed Dolan reveres!!! Then again, most of us have come to learn that head swollen Ed Dolan will never be accused of being athinking, rational man. The bottom line is that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of having lived. Anyone who makes it to age 70 or so has been doing an awful lot of things right. If everyone were dying of diseased conditions in their 30's and 40's, then I would consider looking into what might be causing it, but that is clearly not the case. I have never seen anyone in their 80's who was not frail. That is due to a biological clock which is ticking away in all of us from the moment of our birth. Diet only effects our health on the margins. The FACT is that our food in the US is by and large safe. If it weren't, no one would make it to age 70 or above. -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 1, 4:56*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
On Aug 12, 5:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] This is all hocus-pocus nonsense. The FDA is the expert on food safety, not crackpot "scientific researchers". Says the crackpot know-it-all who expounds without hesitation about subjects for which his knowledge is he is woefully deficient. One distinct difference between Ed and myself is that I present what Ed abhors ... FACTS, whereas Ed is admittedly all about opinion ... namely, HIS. Not being in possession of the facts has never curtailed Ed from running his mouth even when it is obvious to most that Ed knows little or nothing of that about which he is speaking. Your facts are not really facts, they are just another set of opinions camouflaged as facts. Your opinion that known facts are not really facts is merely camouflaged opinion stated as fact. Deletion of (presented facts) and denial of such facts is a ludicrous effort to discredit what is documented and accepted. Socrates taught that wisdom begins in the recognition of how little we know. Every time you open your mouth, you embarrass yourself by demonstrating how little you know and in so doing diminish the sum total of your credibility. Keep up the good work. Ed Dolan has publicly gone on record to state that our food is safe and the FDA ensures that it is. Ed's assertion is not supported by the facts. As is customarily the case, Ed has chosen to run his mouth without knowing what he's talking about. Ed, hasn't bothered to do the research before spewing errant opinions as though they were facts. Lets just take a cursory look at the safety of our food. No, let's not! It is a waste of time and effort. Contends Dolan in vain having been proven wrong in his assertions form known and documented facts. Eds stubborn resistance to enlightenment has become legendary. Only cranks concern themselves with food safety, unless you are being paid to do it like the FDA. Only those concerned about their health and well being concern themselves with food safety. They are understandably cautiously skeptical of the FDA which has proven itself untrustworthy. Obviously you can be counted among those who put their faith in the FDA with heads firmly implanted in the sand. The bottom line is that patients have been callously abandoned to die, denied access to progress by their own FDA at a time when they needed it most, when their life was on the line. AND ... this is the very same FDA that Ed Dolan reveres!!! Then again, most of us have come to learn that head swollen Ed Dolan will never be accused of being a thinking, rational man. The bottom line is that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of having lived. Anyone who makes it to age 70 or so has been doing an awful lot of things right. If everyone were dying of diseased conditions in their 30's and 40's, then I would consider looking into what might be causing it, but that is clearly not the case. The bottom line is NOT that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of MERELY having lived, but rather that we have lived not as well as we should have, having made choices that limit our exposure to that which contributes to cumulative damage of our DNA as we age, genetic mutation that triggers the onset of disease, an indisputable fact that DOLAN refuses to acknowledge. I have never seen anyone in their 80's who was not frail. That is due to a biological clock which is ticking away in all of us from the moment of our birth. Diet only effects our health on the margins. The FACT is that our food in the US is by and large safe. If it weren't, no one would make it to age 70 or above. Granted, age inevitably takes its toll on the biological organism, but diet plays a significant role be it good or bad depending upon the choices we make as to what we ingest. This has become increasingly obvious as evidence accumlates. Jim Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
... On Sep 1, 4:56 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Your facts are not really facts, they are just another set of opinions camouflaged as facts. Your opinion that known facts are not really facts is merely camouflaged opinion stated as fact. Deletion of (presented facts) and denial of such facts is a ludicrous effort to discredit what is documented and accepted. Socrates taught that wisdom begins in the recognition of how little we know. Every time you open your mouth, you embarrass yourself by demonstrating how little you know and in so doing diminish the sum total of your credibility. Keep up the good work. Nope, simply documenting something does not mean it is true and accepted. ALL facts are subject to being interpreted and disputed. My contempt for your so-called facts runneth over! [...] The bottom line is that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of having lived. Anyone who makes it to age 70 or so has been doing an awful lot of things right. If everyone were dying of diseased conditions in their 30's and 40's, then I would consider looking into what might be causing it, but that is clearly not the case. The bottom line is NOT that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of MERELY having lived, but rather that we have lived not as well as we should have, having made choices that limit our exposure to that which contributes to cumulative damage of our DNA as we age, genetic mutation that triggers the onset of disease, an indisputable fact that DOLAN refuses to acknowledge. Most folks live about as well as their culture permits. Trying to escape what your culture gives you is a fool's errand. I have never seen anyone in their 80's who was not frail. That is due to a biological clock which is ticking away in all of us from the moment of our birth. Diet only effects our health on the margins. The FACT is that our food in the US is by and large safe. If it weren't, no one would make it to age 70 or above. Granted, age inevitably takes its toll on the biological organism, but diet plays a significant role be it good or bad depending upon the choices we make as to what we ingest. This has become increasingly obvious as evidence accumlates. Diet plays a role because how and what we eat is an important element of life. However, what is in dispute is how great that role is in the grand scheme of things. Most people in all previous cultures never lived much past the age of 40. Maybe mother nature never intended that we should live to age 70 or 80? Why not talk to your wife and get her input. She is a nurse and knows things about life and death that you and I don't. -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/2/2011 9:35 AM, JimmyMac wrote:
[...] Granted, age inevitably takes its toll on the biological organism, but diet plays a significant role be it good or bad depending upon the choices we make as to what we ingest. This has become increasingly obvious as evidence accumlates. Yeah, but all the good food is boring, and the tasty food bad for you. Such is life. -- Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 2, 11:58*pm, "T°m [email protected]" ""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI
$southslope.net" wrote: On 9/2/2011 9:35 AM, JimmyMac wrote: * [...] Granted, age inevitably takes its toll on the biological organism, but diet plays a significant role be it good or bad depending upon the choices we make as to what we ingest. *This has become increasingly obvious as evidence accumulates. Yeah, but all the good food is boring, and the tasty food bad for you. Such is life. No arguments there. Much of the food that is healthy for you is on the boring side and much food that is tasty food is not heathy for you. Life just isnt't fair, I guess. Jim Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 2, 4:03*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Sep 1, 4:56 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Your facts are not really facts, they are just another set of opinions camouflaged as facts. Your opinion that known facts are not really facts is merely camouflaged opinion stated as fact. *Deletion of (presented facts) and denial of such facts is a ludicrous effort to discredit what is documented and accepted. *Socrates taught that wisdom begins in the recognition of how little we know. *Every time you open your mouth, you embarrass yourself by demonstrating how little you know and in so doing diminish the sum total of your credibility. *Keep up the good work. Nope, simply documenting something does not mean it is true and accepted. ALL facts are subject to being interpreted and disputed. My contempt for your so-called facts runneth over! My contempt for your contempt runneth over. The facts I presented, and you deleted, were tested and verified facts of which you are in denial. You never have been able to discern the difference between a fact and an opinion. Facts are not subject to dispute. Let the lecture begin.. A fact is a pragmatic truth which can be verified and confirmed as opposed to perception, belief or opinion which, though held to be true, is not amenable to confirmation. A fact exists independent of the mind and that means everyone except the most contentious of persons (like you) would readily acknowledge and be in agreement about it ... like temperature, for instance. Measurable, temperature is a fact and is not subject to interpretation. Interpretation is basically a conception based on belief and/or judgment. It's basically your opinion. As valid as an opinion may seem to be and as strongly as an opinion is may be held, it is little more than an interpretation conceived to fit the facts as perceived. You often offer your perceptions as though fact when you are merely stating nothing more than opinion. Opinion is not a fact and that's a fact no matter what kind of spin you attempt to put on it. A fact is information about circumstances that are known to exist or events that are known to have occurred. As such, facts are not subject to debate and that's a fact ... not an opinion. You continue to misconstrue the none too subtle distinction between what constitutes a fact and what constitutes an opinion. You never have and never will know the distinction between the two. It is difficult, if not impossible, to challenge an opinion. You take solace from this because you are less likely to be proven fallible ... a frailty of the human condition to which you could not possibly admit. By your own admission, you are all about opinion and is clamorously contemptuous of logic and facts. You emphatically insists upon being unencumbered by logic and unrestrained by facts for two specific, though unexpressed, reasons. Logic is not your strong suit and fact, by definition, is not subject to debate (read not arguable), which precludes your favorite pastime ... argumentation. You are uncomfortable when bound by the confines of logic and fact. So, what do you do? You argue about opinions, but there's problem with that too. Something cannot be branded "true" or "false", "right" or "wrong" when that something is merely an expression of opinion. Nonetheless this is precisely what you endeavor to do ... debate the non-debatable (read opinion). What is debatable are particulars such as values, policies, proposals or propositions. What is also debatable is whether you will ever be able to discern the distinction between fact and opinion and determine what is and what is not subject to debate. It is worthy to note that an opinion coincides with fact only in direct relation to the degree with which it is based in fact. A purveyor of disinformation, your opinions are most often comprised of immaterial speculation and irrelevant supposition. There is a immense difference between opinion and conjecture. You are not, as often asserted, all about opinion. You are all about conjecture ... a none too subtle distinction which exceeds your poor powers of perception. The bottom line is that you should stick to what you know, not to what you think. You are not entitled to an opinion until you can provide a cogent explanation. The bottom line is that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of having lived. Anyone who makes it to age 70 or so has been doing an awful lot of things right. If everyone were dying of diseased conditions in their 30's and 40's, then I would consider looking into what might be causing it, but that is clearly not the case. The bottom line is NOT that people become diseased and die every day from cancer and other conditions as a result of MERELY having lived, but rather that we have lived not as well as we should have, having made choices that limit our exposure to that which contributes to cumulative damage of our DNA as we age, genetic mutation that triggers the onset of disease, an indisputable fact that DOLAN refuses to acknowledge. Most folks live about as well as their culture permits. Trying to escape what your culture gives you is a fool's errand. Opinion stated as fact. I have never seen anyone in their 80's who was not frail. That is due to a biological clock which is ticking away in all of us from the moment of our birth. Diet only effects our health on the margins. The FACT is that our food in the US is by and large safe. If it weren't, no one would make it to age 70 or above. Granted, age inevitably takes its toll on the biological organism, but diet plays a significant role be it good or bad depending upon the choices we make as to what we ingest. *This has become increasingly obvious as evidence accumulates. Diet plays a role because how and what we eat is an important element of life. However, what is in dispute is how great that role is in the grand scheme of things. Most people in all previous cultures never lived much past the age of 40. Maybe mother nature never intended that we should live to age 70 or 80? Much has changed over time that has contributed to increased longevity. There are man y variable that have com into play, not the least of is advancement in medical sciences, but the role that diet plays cannot be denied. Why not talk to your wife and get her input. She is a nurse and knows things about life and death that you and I don't. Why not get your facts straight before embarrassing yourself? As usual, you are talking crap again about that which you know nothing. My wife is a retired IT professional and a certified therapist ... not a nurse. Can't you ever get anything right??? Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
... On Sep 2, 4:03 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Nope, simply documenting something does not mean it is true and accepted. ALL facts are subject to being interpreted and disputed. My contempt for your so-called facts runneth over! My contempt for your contempt runneth over. The facts I presented, and you deleted, were tested and verified facts of which you are in denial. You never have been able to discern the difference between a fact and an opinion. Facts are not subject to dispute. Let the lecture begin.. Let us NOT begin! You are not qualified to ascertain anything at all about true health and medical facts. It takes expertise to do that. All you are reading is propaganda put forth by know-nothings who have an agenda of their own. They used to call such types snake oil salesmen who could cure all conditions if you would only buy their nostrum. The nostrum can be either a product or information. A new character has come along (Dr. Oz) advising that we should all eat meat and dairy. On the other hand. Ornish is still in business advising against all such foods. This is mainly in connection with heart disease, but even less is known about cancer. Final wisdom according to Ed Dolan the Great ... eat whatever you want but only in moderation! [...] Diet plays a role because how and what we eat is an important element of life. However, what is in dispute is how great that role is in the grand scheme of things. Most people in all previous cultures never lived much past the age of 40. Maybe mother nature never intended that we should live to age 70 or 80? Much has changed over time that has contributed to increased longevity. There are man y variable that have com into play, not the least of is advancement in medical sciences, but the role that diet plays cannot be denied. The trouble with comparing diets and diseases of various peoples around the globe is that most of the other variables are not uniform. Hells Bells, most people in most societies do not get cancer because they do not live long enough to get it. Same is true for heart disease and most other diseases of old age. Such statistical comparisons are worthless. Why not talk to your wife and get her input. She is a nurse and knows things about life and death that you and I don't. Why not get your facts straight before embarrassing yourself? As usual, you are talking crap again about that which you know nothing. My wife is a retired IT professional and a certified therapist ... not a nurse. Can't you ever get anything right??? As a therapist, she has seen people in various stages of debilitation and therefore knows more than you do about the difficulties that go with impairment and diseased conditions. You are more like me - selfish to the core and only concerned about yourself. Welcome to the club! Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 3:04*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Sep 2, 4:03 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Nope, simply documenting something does not mean it is true and accepted. ALL facts are subject to being interpreted and disputed. My contempt for your so-called facts runneth over! My contempt for your contempt runneth over. *The facts I presented, and you deleted, were tested and verified facts of which you are in denial. *You never have been able to discern the difference between a fact and an opinion. *Facts are not subject to dispute. *Let the lecture begin.. Let us NOT begin! I see that you once again callously deleted that which I wrote and to which you are responding. This inappropriate and discourteous. Readers are entitled to know what you are responding to. You are not qualified to ascertain anything at all about true health and medical facts. 1. I was talking about you and fact sin general. 2. Having learned what I learned and having learned how little you know, I dare say that I am much more qualified than are you who are uninformed by choice. It takes expertise to do that. All you are reading is propaganda put forth by know-nothings who have an agenda of their own. What I am reading is labeled as propaganda by a know nothing pursuing his own agenda. that much has become evident in this exchange. You are a completel waste of my time. They used to call such types snake oil salesmen who could cure all conditions if you would only buy their nostrum. The nostrum can be either a product or information. Fortunately, for the most part, medical science has progressed beyond that. A new character has come along (Dr. Oz) advising that we should all eat meat and dairy. MISINFORMATION ALERT!!! Once again you haven't got your facts straight. It never ceases to amaze me how you speak with such authority about that which you know so little and often enough even get things completely WRONG. Could you please extend everyone the courtesy to get your facts straight and cease misinforming the readership. Dr .Oz advses against consumption of any food products source form anything with parents and faces. Dr Oz advocates a plant based diet. On the other hand. Ornish is still in business advising against all such foods. This is mainly in connection with heart disease, but even less is known about cancer. The fact is that a Mediterranean diet which is a heart healthy diet is considered to be a good anti-cancer diet as well. Final wisdom according to Ed Dolan the Great ... eat whatever you want but only in moderation! Might I suggest humble pie? Fell free to eat that in excess. IT will do us all some good. Wisdom and repetition are not synonyms. Furthermore, repetition is no substitute for argument. Diet plays a role because how and what we eat is an important element of life. However, what is in dispute is how great that role is in the grand scheme of things. Most people in all previous cultures never lived much past the age of 40. Maybe mother nature never intended that we should live to age 70 or 80? Much has changed over time *that has contributed to increased longevity. *There are man y variable that have com into play, not the least of is advancement in medical sciences, but the role that diet plays cannot be denied. The trouble with comparing diets and diseases of various peoples around the globe is that most of the other variables are not uniform. Hells Bells, most people in most societies do not get cancer because they do not live long enough to get it. Same is true for heart disease and most other diseases of old age. Such statistical comparisons are worthless. More opinion state as fact by the unenlightened. Why not talk to your wife and get her input. She is a nurse and knows things about life and death that you and I don't. Why not get your facts straight before embarrassing yourself? *As usual, you are talking crap again about that which you know nothing. My wife is a retired IT professional *and a certified therapist ... not a nurse. *Can't you ever get anything right??? As a therapist, she has seen people in various stages of debilitation and therefore knows more than you do about the difficulties that go with impairment and diseased conditions. You are more like me - selfish to the core and only concerned about yourself. Welcome to the club! You are confusing the staion of a nurse who primarily administer to with physical ailments and a therapist who does not. DO NOT flatter yourself by thinking that we are at all alike. I am nothing like you. I have never been and never will be as egocentric, self-serving, self-indulgent and selfish as you are. That is a club to which I never aspire to become a member. Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
... On Sep 5, 3:04 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Let us NOT begin! I see that you once again callously deleted that which I wrote and to which you are responding. This inappropriate and discourteous. Readers are entitled to know what you are responding to. Nope, I will steer any discussion that I am involved in my way. You try to do the same of course, but I am not easily led. I have already told you that your facts are not my facts. [...] They used to call such types snake oil salesmen who could cure all conditions if you would only buy their nostrum. The nostrum can be either a product or information. Fortunately, for the most part, medical science has progressed beyond that. Yes, medical science, but that is not what is under discussion. What is under discussion are cultural prejudices about what foods are good for you and what foods are not good for you. There has been no progress at all about that. It is why there are hundreds of diets out there, all disagreeing with one another. Can you tell me if I should be eating milk with fat in it or skim milk? Only if you think you know something that is actually not known. Dr Oz says with fat, Dr. Ornish says without fat. I say ****'em both! A new character has come along (Dr. Oz) advising that we should all eat meat and dairy. MISINFORMATION ALERT!!! Once again you haven't got your facts straight. It never ceases to amaze me how you speak with such authority about that which you know so little and often enough even get things completely WRONG. Could you please extend everyone the courtesy to get your facts straight and cease misinforming the readership. Dr .Oz advses against consumption of any food products source form anything with parents and faces. Dr Oz advocates a plant based diet. I am going by what I heard on the Joe Scarborough show on MSNBC. Dr. Oz flabergasted motor-mouth Mika by advocating everything that was politically incorrect as far as she was concerned. By the way, Mika is one of the dumbest broads on TV. On the other hand. Ornish is still in business advising against all such foods. This is mainly in connection with heart disease, but even less is known about cancer. The fact is that a Mediterranean diet which is a heart healthy diet is considered to be a good anti-cancer diet as well. We do not know that for sure! That is what I am disagreeing about! Ornish is a quack, but I will admit he is a persuasive quack. Steve Jobs was a follower of his and he is now dying of pancreatic cancer which may have been caused by the Ornish diet. Final wisdom according to Ed Dolan the Great ... eat whatever you want but only in moderation! [...] As a therapist, she has seen people in various stages of debilitation and therefore knows more than you do about the difficulties that go with impairment and diseased conditions. You are more like me - selfish to the core and only concerned about yourself. Welcome to the club! You are confusing the staion of a nurse who primarily administer to with physical ailments and a therapist who does not. DO NOT flatter yourself by thinking that we are at all alike. I am nothing like you. I have never been and never will be as egocentric, self-serving, self-indulgent and selfish as you are. That is a club to which I never aspire to become a member. You could be the president of such a club and I could be the chairman of the board. Tom Sherman could be the CEO. We could call our club "The Three Stooges". One final hint for Dr. Jim McNamara: Write a diet book about what foods to eat or not to eat regarding prostate cancer. You will make a fortune and can give me 15% of what you make for cluing you in. Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insight into the phases of the Internet forum life cycle: a perspective | JimmyMac | Social Issues | 0 | August 30th 11 08:39 AM |
Insight into the phases of the Internet forum life cycle: a perspective | JimmyMac | Social Issues | 0 | August 30th 11 08:31 AM |
Insight into the phases of the Internet forum life cycle: a perspective | JimmyMac | Social Issues | 1 | August 11th 11 05:29 AM |
Insight into the phases of the Internet forum life cycle: a perspective | JimmyMac | Social Issues | 1 | July 28th 11 08:11 PM |
Insight into the phases of the Internet forum life cycle: a perspective | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | July 6th 11 07:08 PM |