|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer
significant advantages over v-brakes? Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth wrote:
I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? The good, non-cheap ones work well. Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? Pads are more expensive, and they're heavier. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? Huh? Are you asking about forks or frames? Frames are all disc-ejection immune. In terms of forks, as long as you attach a serrated-face skewer with a gentle cam profile on an aluminum (not steel or ti) fork, and you attach the QR *properly*, you'll be fine. I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. If it's well-sealed, hydros are low-maintenance, nearly drag-free, and pleasureable to use. If they leak or absorb water, bleeding becomes an issue. Mechanicals are just that: mechanical. Generally easy to fix if something goes wrong, which is pretty rare. IME, both mechanical and hydraulic systems work well, provided they both work as properly. -- Phil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth wrote: I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? The braking power of disk brakes is hugely superior to any other kind. That said, if V-brakes or any other kind provide you with enough stopping power, you might not value the difference. I'm 230lbs and the difference is like night and day. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? I was not aware of this problem. I think a properly mounted wheel would be fine. I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. I've only used mechanical, so I don't know. Joseph |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth wrote:
I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? Yes they do : - Much more power while wet/muddy, - More power at high speed, - No heat dissipation in heat-sensitive tyre and tube. Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? Maintenance is not the same for hydros, but not more complicated than the cable routing and pad aligning needed for vbrakes. Pads cost more but have a longer life, makes no difference. Imho the main downside is cost (yo have to add the cost of the brake system and the cost of new wheels or at least new hubs and a rebuild) when switching from vbrakes to discs. A small downside is that it adds a bit of dish to the wheels, nothing to be really afraid of... It also adds a few grams to your bike, but only a few. A last one is that some hydros may encounter power fading when heating (depends on brake fluid among other factors), some do not at all. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? As stated, the problems with discs and forks are generally a combination of factors. If you want something totally safe, go for a 20mm thru-axle - it will also make your fork (much) stiffer. I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. Good mechanicals, ie with ball bearings (not much choice : AvidBB5/BB7 or Hayes MX1) are not a bad choice. They have the upside to be totally insensitive to heating, whereas some hydros may be (especially with old brake fluid). They generally have the downside to be a bit less progressive (ie to offer a less sensitive touch). It depends also on the lever and cable housing used. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
In article . com,
damyth ) wrote: I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? The ones I have - Hope and Magura hydraulics - work very well indeed, and continue to do so even in the rain. This I find useful :-) The Avid linear-pull brake on my fixer is anaemic in comparison. Maintenance is pretty simple (ask me about that again on Monday though..) for hydraulics and even more so for mechanicals. Heavy urban or off-road use obviously chews the pads more than ordinary road riding; I would typically get about 1500 km from the front Hope Mini on the commuting bike, whereas those on the trike had plenty of meat left after 8000. Except the outer one on the right wheel which, for no readily-apparent reason, had worn out completely. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? I've never had a problem on either of my conventionally-forked disc braked machines, though bear in mind that these are used almost exclusively ON-road. Just check the front q/r regularly and things /should/ be OK I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. I've had a brief play with a bike equipped with Avid mechanicals and was not terribly impressed. The general feel and modulation of hydraulics is much nicer, IMHO, and when I am rich and famous, I shall rid the fleet entirely of machines which are stopped by pulling a piece of string. Does anyone do a nice carbon fork with disc brake tabs and mudguard mounts? -- Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/ The System is well pleased with this Unit's performance, which falls within expected parameters. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth says...
I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? When v-brakes work well, they are fine, but discs offer some advantages. I have a bike with v-brakes where the front howls like a banshee intermittently. I haven't found an easy cure for this problem. Discs will be somewhat heavier, even if you get expensive lightweight ones. Discs generally offer more predictable and better modulated braking. Discs aren't affected by a rim being out of true or other slight variations in the rim surface. Rim brakes leave some of the pad rubber on the rim which itself causes some issues. Discs are easier to replace and generally cheaper than rims should wear of the braking surface become an issue. Discs do require periodic recentering and adjustment, but so do v-brakes. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? The so called controversy is the product of one person's crusade. Last I checked, he was the only person known to have had a disc brake wheel ejection. For a variety of reasons, his was a very peculiar case. It is almost impossible for it to happen unless the skewer is so loose that the mechanical obstacle of the retention lips is bypassed. In that case, you would lose your wheel anyway the first time it left the ground going over a small bump. I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. Hydraulics are generally lighter, but better is debatable. One of the best loved disc brakes out there is the Avid mechanical. Hydraulics are more progressive, meaning that slight increases in lever pressure produce proportionally much more braking power. This may be a curse or a gift. If you aren't expecting it, progressive braking could send you over the bars. Been there, done that. If they are progressive and not "grabby", then once you get used to them, they have a very positive feel and other brakes seem slow and mushy in comparison. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth wrote: I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. Let's try to remember tha advantages of disc brakes... -Great for wet, muddy conditions where the rim of the wheels get mucked up -Great in case you really wack a rim, you can still 'get out' and have a brake BUT they are expensive, complicated, require specific forks, frames and hubs. When compared to V Brakes, and not in the conditions mentioned, vbrakes are superior. BUT many still get them for coffee shop ponts before the ride. If ya gotta do them, hydraulic are the way to go but are a large step above mechanical discs in terms of cost, complexity, service required, fragility. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
damyth wrote:
I've never ridden a bicycle with disk brakes. Do they really offer significant advantages over v-brakes? if you ride in mud and rain, yes, definitely. better stopping, no fade, and much longer pad life. Are there any down sides to using disk brakes (compared to v-brakes), like maintenance? no, just as easy to set up. I'm aware of the controversy of front disk brakes in current fork designs, so here I'm specifically referring to rear brakes. Are there any mass-produced forks that are disk safe? anything with lawyer lips is safe. use a hub with serrated axle faces and a closed cam skewer like shimano or campy if you're still worried. don't get suckered in by any chicken little stories from people that deliberately omit key elements from their math. I also understand, generally speaking, hydraulic is better than mechanical when it comes to disk brakes. yes. much better modulation. once set up, trouble free to operate as they self-adjust. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
disk vs. v/cantilever brakes
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bleeding Hayes disk brakes | Kim | Mountain Biking | 4 | April 9th 06 10:23 PM |
Pedersen self energizing brakes. | Dan Burkhart | Techniques | 70 | June 12th 05 10:25 PM |
Disk hubs for rim brakes... | Wasatch5k | Techniques | 1 | February 28th 05 08:23 AM |
XTR brake levers with Avid mechanical disk brakes | nmpub | Techniques | 1 | February 8th 04 02:14 PM |
CPSC judgement on disk brakes and QR forks | James Annan | Techniques | 125 | September 24th 03 09:30 PM |