|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Vol Parkic wrote: So SHE was at fault. Uh, no. The law is quite clear on this. CC |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... Vol Parkic wrote: So SHE was at fault. Uh, no. The law is quite clear on this. Actually it isn't. According to Times Up! less than 20% of the vehicle drivers suffer anything legal at all. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Baruch Spinoza wrote: Uh, no. The law is quite clear on this. Actually it isn't. According to Times Up! less than 20% of the vehicle drivers suffer anything legal at all. New York State Traffic Code, Section 4-12 (c): "Getting out of vehicle: No person shall get out of any vehicle from the side facing on the traveled part of the street in such a manner as to interfere with the right of the operator of an approaching vehicle or bicycle." http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/per...fic_rules.html I would love to hear from you what his unclear about the law on this subject. CC |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The Wogster wrote: In Canada cars and motorcycles are required to have lights on, during the day. A cyclist could also ride with lights on, during the day. This is a great idea. I also think they should be required to ride with very loud sirens and multicolored propellers on their bikes, and wave their arms and shout as loud as they can. And if some doofus throws jumps out in front of them with a length 2x4 anyway, well, they shouldn't have been in the road in the first place. CC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:54:48 -0500,
ws.net, "Vol Parkic" wrote: Agree that you are "pretty ****ing stupid" for implying the bicycle rider cannot avoid the situation, and it is always the car driver that failed to check. "11-1105.Opening and closing vehicle doors No person shall open any door on a motor vehicle unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so and can be done without interfering with the movement of other traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open on a side of a vehicle available to moving traffic for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers." That's one part of the Uniform Vehicle code that is widely adopted by the civilised world. Check your local statutes. -- zk |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Baruch Spinoza wrote: Uh, no. The law is quite clear on this. Actually it isn't. According to Times Up! less than 20% of the vehicle drivers suffer anything legal at all. New York State Traffic Code, Section 4-12 (c): "Getting out of vehicle: No person shall get out of any vehicle from the side facing on the traveled part of the street in such a manner as to interfere with the right of the operator of an approaching vehicle or bicycle." http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/per...fic_rules.html I would love to hear from you what his unclear about the law on this subject. When the bicycle is passing too close to the the cars, in the "door zone", it is not maintaining proper distance from the parked cars. That is why over 80% of so called "doorings" are really the fault of the bicycle operator. (also Motocycles) It is Simple Failure to maintain proper distance. It is not the right of the approaching bicycle to graze cars in the door zone, but since you think it is, you will self extinguish. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
BaruchSpinoza wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Baruch Spinoza wrote: Uh, no. The law is quite clear on this. Actually it isn't. According to Times Up! less than 20% of the vehicle drivers suffer anything legal at all. New York State Traffic Code, Section 4-12 (c): "Getting out of vehicle: No person shall get out of any vehicle from the side facing on the traveled part of the street in such a manner as to interfere with the right of the operator of an approaching vehicle or bicycle." http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/per...fic_rules.html I would love to hear from you what his unclear about the law on this subject. When the bicycle is passing too close to the the cars, in the "door zone", it is not maintaining proper distance from the parked cars. That is why over 80% of so called "doorings" are really the fault of the bicycle operator. (also Motocycles) SOURCE??? It's absurd, AND wrong on its face. It is Simple Failure to maintain proper distance. It is not the right of the approaching bicycle to graze cars in the door zone, but since you think it is, you will self extinguish. How many times does CC have to tell you (are they ALL you? the names keep changing) that he doesn't ride in the door zone. The law clearly puts the onus on the vehicle driver to OPEN HIS OR HER DOOR CAUTIOUSLY, checking the conveniently placed and appropriately named REAR SIDE-VIEW MIRROR before doing so. IS THIS REALLY TOO DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO GRASP?!? Please learn to read and process information. Good luck. BS |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
The Wogster wrote:
As for someone jumping out with a 2 x 4, assault with a deadly weapon is illegal in most civilized countries..... Except when practiced on cyclists, when it is never enforced. -- "There are number of people asking about fixed and its meaning. This is a real joke. I do not know anyone in the UK who took it to mean anything other than fixed as in fixed a race, fixed an election, fixed the intelligence. If you fix something, you make it the way you want it." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does public health care pay for your head injuries? | John Doe | UK | 187 | November 30th 04 02:51 PM |
New Bicycle Seat More Healthy for Men | Paulpstein | Social Issues | 3 | November 13th 04 11:53 PM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | Social Issues | 1716 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
TIMES UP BICYCLE RIDE (NYC) AND COMMUNITY GARDENING BASH!!! | *Because **NYC** Could Be BETTER!! | Recumbent Biking | 0 | July 7th 04 02:12 PM |