#41
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
"Jim Flom" wrote in message
news:0Q0ui.81131$tB5.58011@edtnps90... "Kyle Legate" wrote... Likewise, I emailed you my retort, but for the benefit of the list: Never received your emailed retort. http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/20...s_cause_sc.php http://tinyurl.com/2936ku (Pubmed; primary research) Thanks for this. What I'm not seeing in the abstract is factoring in frequency of use. The article on the meta-analysis cited _heavy_ pot use as correlating with psychosis. What I see in the abstract you provide doesn't account for frequency: "METHOD: We used a case register that contained 757 cases of first onset schizophrenia, 182 (24%) of whom had used cannabis in the year prior to first presentation..." Did they use it once? Once a month? Etc. Heavy use in most research is considered to be one joint a day. From the bbc : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6917003.stm "But Professor Leslie Iverson, from the University of Oxford, said there was still no conclusive evidence that cannabis use causes psychotic illness. "Their prediction that 14% of psychotic outcomes in young adults in the UK may be due to cannabis use is not supported by the fact that the incidence of schizophrenia has not shown any significant change in the past 30 years." In the first place schizophrenia is just a single form of psychosis. Bipolar disorder is probably more common. In my experience schizophrenia is pretty much set by your genes but bipolar is more strongly attached to your behavior and learning. Of course I'm sure that it is also strongly connected by the way you're wired but I think that the majority of the population go through manic and depressive episodes all the time and it is the extremes of these states that are considered psychosis and not the more mild forms which we would all call "normal consciencionousness". |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote in message
link.net... "Kyle Legate" wrote in message ... Furthermore, you have to consider who is paying for the research: Woga woga woga. Shouldn't that be Wada wada wada? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
"Kyle Legate" wrote in message
... Jim Flom wrote: Never received your emailed retort. Interesting. I double checked my sent mails, the address was correct. Maybe I'm filtered as junk (hey hey HEY. no murmuring from the audience). Science's strength is also its weakness in the hands of dummies. You or I might want to seize the position we prefer based this or that study (e.g., global warming). The fact is that I can't isolate the one article/study and conclude pot causes psychosis as if it is some kind of natural law, and you can't walk away from the meta-analysis study and simply dismiss it (well you could but it would be dishonest science convincing only yourself). What it does do is add to the body of knowledge as we keep growing in our understanding of cannabis. And one another. Peace love dove... Well, I know now that if I graduate to regular heavy use I should keep my eyes open for signs of psychosis. Maybe marijuana and rbr have something in common. I just came across this quote that I had clipped and its context, addressing the frequency question, that I pulled from the article: "'... we think the evidence is strong enough that people should be made aware that if they use cannabis they have an increased risk of having a psychotic episode. Especially if they use it on a regular basis.' "-- Stanley Zammit of Cardiff University, one of the researchers who found that people who had used marijuana at least once were 41 per cent more likely to experience psychosis, including schizophrenia, hallucinations and hearing voices, than those who had never used the drug. Frequent pot smokers -- defined as daily or weekly users of marijuana -- had a 50-200 per cent greater likelihood." Notice that the experience of psychosis "includes" but is not limited to schizophrenia. As the E.R. doc said, many people have the one experience of delusional thinking, that is, drug-induced psychosis, and back off of the weed and don't have a recurring experience. These experiences would never be recorded as schizophrenia. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
On Aug 6, 7:20 am, "Jim Flom" wrote:
Grow ops get busted all the time around here, but you wonder what it is all accomplishing. It accomplishes welfare for drug cops, judges, lawyers, and jailers. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
On Aug 13, 9:06 am, "Jim Flom" wrote:
"Kyle Legate" wrote in message ... Jim Flom wrote: Never received your emailed retort. Interesting. I double checked my sent mails, the address was correct. Maybe I'm filtered as junk (hey hey HEY. no murmuring from the audience). Science's strength is also its weakness in the hands of dummies. You or I might want to seize the position we prefer based this or that study (e.g., global warming). The fact is that I can't isolate the one article/study and conclude pot causes psychosis as if it is some kind of natural law, and you can't walk away from the meta-analysis study and simply dismiss it (well you could but it would be dishonest science convincing only yourself). What it does do is add to the body of knowledge as we keep growing in our understanding of cannabis. And one another. Peace love dove... Well, I know now that if I graduate to regular heavy use I should keep my eyes open for signs of psychosis. Maybe marijuana and rbr have something in common. I just came across this quote that I had clipped and its context, addressing the frequency question, that I pulled from the article: "'... we think the evidence is strong enough that people should be made aware that if they use cannabis they have an increased risk of having a psychotic episode. Especially if they use it on a regular basis.' Assuming for the moment it is true, yeah, an "episode" -- not "permanent psychosis" as CV said at least twice. "-- Stanley Zammit of Cardiff University, one of the researchers who found that people who had used marijuana at least once were 41 per cent more likely to experience psychosis, including schizophrenia, hallucinations and hearing voices, than those who had never used the drug. Frequent pot smokers -- defined as daily or weekly users of marijuana -- had a 50-200 per cent greater likelihood." Notice that the experience of psychosis "includes" but is not limited to schizophrenia. As the E.R. doc said, many people have the one experience of delusional thinking, that is, drug-induced psychosis, and back off of the weed and don't have a recurring experience. So weed usage is self-regulating in this sense. I offer free advice: don't smoke weed. I was advised to stop posting to rbr. Good advice, really -- better than mine. These experiences would never be recorded as schizophrenia. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
Jim Flom wrote:
Notice that the experience of psychosis "includes" but is not limited to schizophrenia. As the E.R. doc said, many people have the one experience of delusional thinking, that is, drug-induced psychosis, and back off of the weed and don't have a recurring experience. These experiences would never be recorded as schizophrenia. SLAVE of THE STATE wrote: I offer free advice: don't smoke weed. I was advised to stop posting to rbr. Good advice, really -- better than mine. Posting to rbr and smoking weed seems to have some similar long term prognoses (plural ?). |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
On Aug 14, 12:06 am, "Jim Flom" wrote:
"Kyle Legate" wrote in message ... Jim Flom wrote: Never received your emailed retort. Interesting. I double checked my sent mails, the address was correct. Maybe I'm filtered as junk (hey hey HEY. no murmuring from the audience). Science's strength is also its weakness in the hands of dummies. You or I might want to seize the position we prefer based this or that study (e.g., global warming). The fact is that I can't isolate the one article/study and conclude pot causes psychosis as if it is some kind of natural law, and you can't walk away from the meta-analysis study and simply dismiss it (well you could but it would be dishonest science convincing only yourself). What it does do is add to the body of knowledge as we keep growing in our understanding of cannabis. And one another. Peace love dove... Well, I know now that if I graduate to regular heavy use I should keep my eyes open for signs of psychosis. Maybe marijuana and rbr have something in common. I just came across this quote that I had clipped and its context, addressing the frequency question, that I pulled from the article: "'... we think the evidence is strong enough that people should be made aware that if they use cannabis they have an increased risk of having a psychotic episode. Especially if they use it on a regular basis.' "-- Stanley Zammit of Cardiff University, one of the researchers who found that people who had used marijuana at least once were 41 per cent more likely to experience psychosis, including schizophrenia, hallucinations and hearing voices, than those who had never used the drug. Frequent pot smokers -- defined as daily or weekly users of marijuana -- had a 50-200 per cent greater likelihood." Notice that the experience of psychosis "includes" but is not limited to schizophrenia. As the E.R. doc said, many people have the one experience of delusional thinking, that is, drug-induced psychosis, and back off of the weed and don't have a recurring experience. These experiences would never be recorded as schizophrenia. But what is cause and what is effect? It has already been determined that many people who use ecstacy are self-medicating for depression that they don't even realize they have. -M |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
"Marian" wrote in message
ups.com... But what is cause and what is effect? It has already been determined that many people who use ecstacy are self-medicating for depression that they don't even realize they have. Determined by whom? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
When's it enough??
On Aug 16, 7:14 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Marian" wrote in message ups.com... But what is cause and what is effect? It has already been determined that many people who use ecstacy are self-medicating for depression that they don't even realize they have. Determined by whom? dunno. But the idea isn't unheard of. "It is likely that many compulsive ecstasy users are unconsciously trying to self-medicate their depression. (Of course, Ecstasy is not an effective daily antidepressant and may actually exacerbate symptoms of depression.)" http://www.dancesafe.org/documents/d...depression.php |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So When's The Third Edition Coming Out? | NYC XYZ | Recumbent Biking | 1 | March 2nd 06 04:50 PM |
When's the next UK muni event? | phil | Unicycling | 30 | September 9th 05 02:05 PM |
When's the Bat-Mitzvah? | Claire Petersky | General | 2 | May 5th 05 04:25 PM |