|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
OK, I'm not sure if I have the correct ng for this topic, or if this
is even on topic, so I cross posted to another ng. hoping to get a response. (So, please forgive me if I am ot) ---------- I need clarification about bicycle riders riding bicycles on sidewalks in Phoenix, Arizona. Is this covered by state, county or city statutes??? ------------ The scenario goes something like this: A driver of an automobile is in a supermarket parking lot driving towards an exit. Usually, there is a sidewalk crossing the exit path of the vehicles leaving the parking lot. Sometimes there is a stop sign, usually there is not. A quick check to the right by the driver of the automobile shows that there are no pedestrians on the sidewalk, so the driver is concentrating on the traffic to his/her left, looking for an opening in the traffic to turn onto the roadway. Out of nowhere, a bicyclist [approaching the vehicle on the passenger side, (right to left) and moving much faster than a walking or jogging pedestrian] almost rams the passenger side of the vehicle, and starts swearing at the driver of the vehicle for not yielding to the bicyclist on the sidewalk. Apparently the bicyclist believes (passionately) that he is in the right, and that the driver of the automobile is supposed to yield to the bicyclist crossing the exit path of the automobile. If anyone is aware of the laws the Phoenix area, would you please help? Possibly a url or ??? Many thanks in advance for your help. James |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
just the bike specific stuff- http://azbikeclub.r.m6.net/bikelaw.html
check it with the actual law- http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/28/title28.htm It's my understanding that in arizona bicycling on the sidewalk is not against the law, as a bicycle is not considered a vehicle in that state. although, operating at a speed faster than the normal users of a sidewalk could be considered reckless driving on the part of the cyclist. hope this makes things somewhat blurry... progunner wrote: OK, I'm not sure if I have the correct ng for this topic, or if this is even on topic, so I cross posted to another ng. hoping to get a response. (So, please forgive me if I am ot) ---------- I need clarification about bicycle riders riding bicycles on sidewalks in Phoenix, Arizona. Is this covered by state, county or city statutes??? ------------ The scenario goes something like this: A driver of an automobile is in a supermarket parking lot driving towards an exit. Usually, there is a sidewalk crossing the exit path of the vehicles leaving the parking lot. Sometimes there is a stop sign, usually there is not. A quick check to the right by the driver of the automobile shows that there are no pedestrians on the sidewalk, so the driver is concentrating on the traffic to his/her left, looking for an opening in the traffic to turn onto the roadway. Out of nowhere, a bicyclist [approaching the vehicle on the passenger side, (right to left) and moving much faster than a walking or jogging pedestrian] almost rams the passenger side of the vehicle, and starts swearing at the driver of the vehicle for not yielding to the bicyclist on the sidewalk. Apparently the bicyclist believes (passionately) that he is in the right, and that the driver of the automobile is supposed to yield to the bicyclist crossing the exit path of the automobile. If anyone is aware of the laws the Phoenix area, would you please help? Possibly a url or ??? Many thanks in advance for your help. James |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
So it looks like you were driving and got into a heated discussion
with that sidewalk cyclist. For whatever it's worth, I learned rights-of-way and yields with a simple rule of thumb: traffic on the smaller road always yields to traffic on a larger road, except where signs or signals say otherwise. When riding a bicycle on a path or sidewalk, I always consider the path or sidewalk the smaller road, and therefore am compelled to yield to traffic on regular roads and highways as well as wider paths that intersect the path that I'm on (such as driveways and the supermarket entrance that you describe). Since the sidewalk or parallel cycle path is *always* the narrower road for the purposes of determing right-of-way, you can see why it's such a pain to ride on the sidewalk. At speeds faster than your average walker or runner (easily attainable by a cyclist, whatever his condition!), it places the cyclist in a very awkward legal situation: does he stop at every intersection and driveway, or does he ignore cross-traffic and ride blithely on? The former is very sound, so far as the law goes, and quite safe--but inconvenient. You might as well walk. The latter is convenient but, as you saw, hazardous, as it sets a cyclist up for all sorts of inevitable confrontations. This is why I ride in the roadway. If traffic won't yield to me, it will definitely yield to the car behind me, or the truck behind him, or the bus behind that. The cyclist riding wrong-way and on the sidewalk was therefore probably in the wrong, and operating under the fatal misapprehension that all traffic should yield to him in whatever circumstance. Had he collided with your car and done actual damage, you'd probably have a good case on your hands. Get on your bike and try it sometime in a quiet neighborhood. You'd be surprised. -Luigi |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:21:09 GMT, (Bill Z.)
wrote in message : Laws regarding use of bicycles on sidewalk vary from state to state, with some states allowing local jurisdictions to regulate the use of a sidewalk by bicycles. Or maybe the guy is trying to blame the cyclist for a SMIDSY... -- Guy === May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
Hi,
You should contact the Arizona State Department of Transportation. They would be able to give you an accurate answer to your question about bikes on sidewalks. Also, contact the City of Pheonix about any local ordinances governing bikes. In my state, Florida, riding on sidewalks is allowed but you must give way to pedestrians. But, in the city I live in there is a local ordinance prohibiting riding (you can walk them) bicycles on sidewalks in the downtown district. As for accident, if that same scenario happened here I would say the cyclist is at fault for hitting the stationary vehicle. Here's a couple links to get you in the right direction. Take care - www.dot.state.az.us www.ci.phoenix.az.us progunner wrote in message m... OK, I'm not sure if I have the correct ng for this topic, or if this is even on topic, so I cross posted to another ng. hoping to get a response. (So, please forgive me if I am ot) ---------- I need clarification about bicycle riders riding bicycles on sidewalks in Phoenix, Arizona. Is this covered by state, county or city statutes??? ------------ The scenario goes something like this: A driver of an automobile is in a supermarket parking lot driving towards an exit. Usually, there is a sidewalk crossing the exit path of the vehicles leaving the parking lot. Sometimes there is a stop sign, usually there is not. A quick check to the right by the driver of the automobile shows that there are no pedestrians on the sidewalk, so the driver is concentrating on the traffic to his/her left, looking for an opening in the traffic to turn onto the roadway. Out of nowhere, a bicyclist [approaching the vehicle on the passenger side, (right to left) and moving much faster than a walking or jogging pedestrian] almost rams the passenger side of the vehicle, and starts swearing at the driver of the vehicle for not yielding to the bicyclist on the sidewalk. Apparently the bicyclist believes (passionately) that he is in the right, and that the driver of the automobile is supposed to yield to the bicyclist crossing the exit path of the automobile. If anyone is aware of the laws the Phoenix area, would you please help? Possibly a url or ??? Many thanks in advance for your help. James |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:40:16 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:21:09 GMT, (Bill Z.) wrote in message : Laws regarding use of bicycles on sidewalk vary from state to state, with some states allowing local jurisdictions to regulate the use of a sidewalk by bicycles. Or maybe the guy is trying to blame the cyclist for a SMIDSY... OK, I'll bite. SMIDSY? "sorry, mate I didn't see you?" In any event, Guy, the cyclist was counterflow and moving fast on the footpath. Nobody looks for anything there. A few of these SMIDSY incidents and I was a confirmed vehicular cyclist. -Luigi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
"Luigi de Guzman" wrote in message
... For whatever it's worth, I learned rights-of-way and yields with a simple rule of thumb: traffic on the smaller road always yields to traffic on a larger road, except where signs or signals say otherwise. When riding a bicycle on a path or sidewalk, I always consider the path or sidewalk the smaller road, and therefore am compelled to yield to traffic on regular roads and highways as well as wider paths that intersect the path that I'm on (such as driveways and the supermarket entrance that you describe). That's might be a good rule for survival, but as law it's all wet. Let's suppose we have a through street with a sidewalk, and several side streets with stop signs. Let's suppose we have a pedestrian walking straight, using the sidewalk on the through street. A pedestrian on the sidewalk has the right of way over vehicles on the side streets. They have to stop for him. That same pedestrian also has the right of way over traffic turning off the through street across his path. The traffic has to wait until he has crossed the street. What's true for the pedestrian is true for any legal user of the sidewalk (jogger, baby carriage, wheelchair, Segway, in-line skater, bicyclist, marching jazz band). What the original poster was talking about is a legitimate problem from both sides. The vehicle driver often can't see whether traffic is coming without pulling far enough forward to block the sidewalk. However, this blocks the sidewalk from other users who, in fact, have the right of way. This is particularly irritating when there's no way for the pedestrian to walk behind the vehicle safely. Courtesy is the best rule in these circumstances, but shouldn't obscure the basic principle that it is not legal for a vehicle to block a sidewalk. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
The whole Phoenix code, in searchable form, is he
http://livepublish.municode.com/2/lp...itlist.htm&2.0 (this specific link is the result of a search on "sidewalk") Oh, and my previous post may have been a bit snippy. I certainly agree with those who point out that, legal or not, it is imprudent for a bicyclist to ride on the sidewalk in the "wrong" direction at a high rate of speed. In my pedestrian mode, I'm really tired of people blocking the sidewalks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:08:49 GMT, "Mike Kruger"
wrote: The whole Phoenix code, in searchable form, is he http://livepublish.municode.com/2/lp...itlist.htm&2.0 (this specific link is the result of a search on "sidewalk") Oh, and my previous post may have been a bit snippy. I certainly agree with those who point out that, legal or not, it is imprudent for a bicyclist to ride on the sidewalk in the "wrong" direction at a high rate of speed. In my pedestrian mode, I'm really tired of people blocking the sidewalks. Agreed. But now what I want to know is whether or not there is a difference between a cyclist and a pedestrian on the sidewalk, legally-speaking. If a cyclist on the sidewalk is considered a pedestrian moving really really fast, that's one thing. If the cyclist is considered a vehicle operator who is incidentally permitted to operate on the sidewalk (where other vehicles are not permitted), then that's qutie another, isn't it? -Luigi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | patrick | Racing | 1790 | November 8th 04 03:16 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
Phoenix, Az. Bicycle on Sidewalk Laws-NEED HELP! | progunner | General | 30 | March 15th 04 10:54 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | Social Issues | 14 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |